That's exactly blaming the victim. That he chose to believe she won't repeat the crime doesn't make him in any way responsible for the crime. You are basically saying that the victim should avoid all actions that trigger the aggressive behavior. That situation happens in abusive households all the time: according to the aggressor, the victim is always the faulty party for acting in some way to trigger the aggression. It's called blaming the victim.
Blaming the victim is saying they did something to
warrant being victimized
not saying they made poor decisions that put themselves in a position where victimization was more likely.
I was quite clear in noting that full responsibility
for the aggression lies with the victimizer, not the victim. People trying to paint that as blaming the victim ignore a major respopnsibility the victim has to themselves: the victim, and the victim only, is responsible for their own choices with regard to personal safety. People shouldn't sit back and say "Well, since I have a right to do something, I shouldn't have to
not do it simply because doing it is very likely to put me in a very dangerous situation".
Adults are responsible for the choices they make regarding their own safety. If the person makes a choice where they have a reasonable expectation of safety, then they have exercised good judgement. But if they make choices where they can reasonable expect to be
unsafe, they exercised very poor judgement.
The analogy I provided showed a man exercising
very poor judgement in three ways. 1. Knowingly marrying a person who murdered their first spouse. 2. Engaging in certain specific behaviors that they know will increase their chance for becoming a victim. 3. thinking that what happened to others couldn't happen to him.
People
need to be aware of things that can increase the likelihood of victimization so that they can
make the informed choices for self-preservation.
The victims do
not have
any responsibility with regard to the crime that was committed. Full responsibility for the crime lies with the perpetrator of the crime.
Victims
do have full responsibility over the choices they make as they pertain to their safety.
If they exercise poor judgement (and by that I mean doing things where one can
reasonably expect to become the victim of a crime), then they
need to know this so that they can become empowered to exercise
better judgement in the future.
Empowerment involves knowing what one can do to minimize victimization. There
are factors which increase the likelihood of victimization. People
need to be aware of those factors in order to avoid them.
And if anyone think that the crime should receive less punishment because of the behaviour of the victim, as has been done and argued with rape cases, that is also excusing the rapists.
Of course. But what the hell does
that have to do with anything I have actually said?