- Joined
- Jan 5, 2007
- Messages
- 9,349
- Reaction score
- 3,947
- Location
- Montana
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
I understand that you don't care about the sponsorships but what I care about is the message, all rhetoric that ignores substance. The results of the last two years are totally ignored as the left wants to portray it all about anger without substance. Why wouldn't the American people be angry with the results Obama has generated? Those that continue to support Obama buy the rhetoric and ignore the actual results.
Instead of inheriting the economy, Obama helped create it. Instead of "this mess" taking 8 years to develop, liberals ignore the economic results of 52 straight strong months of economic growth and job creation from 2003-2007. Democrats took control of Congress in January 2007 as people ignored the results to buy the rhetoric. Liberals hope for a repeat this time as they want people to ignore the results and buy the rhetoric.
The message of the rally had nothing to do with that. It was mainly focused on the polarizing and political theatrics and sensationalism that the media on both sides engages in.
Sorry, since when was god able to advise presidents? (except of course in issues of invasion)
No, it should have focused on energizing their side to go to the polls tomorrow, for election results matter, not dick measuring.Right, and it should have focused in the results, for results matter, not rhetoric.
Yes, him, and Ozzy Osbourne are going to take over the world for Islam :roll:
He was OK with the Fatwa on Rushdie's head.
Ok with you? No insanity there? You OK with freedom of speech turning into a death sentence?
Yes folks, we need a rally to restore sanity.
.
So wait Conservative.. let me get this straight, you attempt to McCarthy this rally with a list of sponsors from a completely unrelated event that happened a month prior, showing you don't even have a clue as to minor details regarding the party (and possibly do not even know which rally is being discussed), and now you are making statements as to what the message should have focused on?
Do you have the faintest clue what the message was, or even which rally is being discussed?
Yes folks, we need a rally to restore sanity.
.
Rally to Restore Sanity attendance estimated at 215,000
Divide 87,000 into 215,000 = ???
:2funny::2funny:
2.5
Glenn who?:2wave:
He was OK with the Fatwa on Rushdie's head.
Ok with you? No insanity there? You OK with freedom of speech turning into a death sentence?
Yes folks, we need a rally to restore sanity.
.
You are right, I got the rallies confused but not the message. It is the message that trumps actual results at both of these rallies. Results matter a lot more than rhetoric which of course both rallies ignored. It is about keeping the liberal based blind to actual results. Let's see if it works.
We had one. It was last weekend.
Looked to me like it was the rally of the insane, you know the people that do the same thing over and over again expecting a different result? If you continue to vote the "liberal" agenda and expert different results you are definitely insane.
What was the message at the rally Saturday?
edit for a hint: the OP in this thread is contradictory to it.
Wasn't it the Bush-Chenney administration running our country for 8 of the last 10 years? That didn't work out to well. By your own logic, shouldn't we try voting for democrats for at least the next 6 years, in order to avoid "doing the same thing over again?"
Wasn't it the Bush-Chenney administration running our country for 8 of the last 10 years? That didn't work out to well. By your own logic, shouldn't we try voting for democrats for at least the next 6 years, in order to avoid "doing the same thing over again?"
Maybe you ought to tell Stewart
"I'm really happy you're here, even if none of us are really quite sure why we're here," Stewart said. "So, uh, what exactly was this? ... I can’t control what people think this was. I can only tell you my intentions." and then went on not to tell his intentions were.
sounded to me like a protest rally of the 60's but this time the people protesting actually have their leadership in charge of the country thus don't have a clue.
keep reading.... it was about 12 minutes or so of dialogue after that
keep reading.... it was about 12 minutes or so of dialogue after that
I read it and see the party for what it really was. In spite of the Stewart goal the rally was co-opted and became political. I actually like Jon Stewart but the reality is those that attended did so with different intent that Stewart had thus the first line is really the key one.
How does that "co-opt" the rally?
Stewarts message didn't change because of any signs people held up. The message stayed the same, and like I said about Becks rally, the message is all that matters. Niether message was political.
Why do you hate peoples freedom and rights to hold up signs they wanna hold up?
You have yet to show how it was actually "co-opted".
Ohhhh, baby... it's a wild world....
There were no political signs at the Beck Rally which actually did what it was supposed to do, restore honor and it was all about honor. This turned into a political rally showing how insane liberals really are.
I have no problem with freedom of speech and the right to hold signs but call it what it really was, a politcal rally of the insane!
Yep. Ok bud. Whatever you say.
Btw... just wanted to ask. Where was honor lost? And why did a guy called Glenn Beck have to restore it?
You know what. Nevermind. That was Rhetorical and exposes the delusions of those who support that entire train of thought.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?