Since a member on my thread "evidence that Sandy Hook was a hoax" is trying to derail my thread by trying to shift the burden of proof, I decided it would be easier for him if I shifted the burden of proof myself and to hopefully keep my other thread on track. Premise is rather simple, provide evidence that Sandy Hook wasn't a hoax.
Just to be clear, I don't believe Sandy Hook was a hoax/false flag. I used to, but that's another story that I've already gone into detail about.
WTF? There were multiple gunshot victims found inside that school therefore evidence of a mass school shooting exists. What, exactly, is the alleged "hoax" idea based on?
Since a member on my thread "evidence that Sandy Hook was a hoax" is trying to derail my thread by trying to shift the burden of proof, I decided it would be easier for him if I shifted the burden of proof myself and to hopefully keep my other thread on track. Premise is rather simple, provide evidence that Sandy Hook wasn't a hoax.
Just to be clear, I don't believe Sandy Hook was a hoax/false flag. I used to, but that's another story that I've already gone into detail about.
No matter how many threads that you create the burden of proof is still on those claiming that Sandy Hook was a hoax.
Just as you will not finding anybody proving the official narrative is true. It is claimed, but it is unproved.
However, you will find many people appealing to emotions, but not a one dealing with the unusual circumstances and facts.
Adam Lanza and Nicholas Cruz are two diabolical supermen in the collective mind. When everything the American people believe is false, we will know the success of our misinformation efforts. Indeed, it is easier to fool a man than it is to explain to him how he has been fooled.
Unproved assertions are the food of the masses.
Just as you will not finding anybody proving the official narrative is true. It is claimed, but it is unproved.
However, you will find many people appealing to emotions, but not a one dealing with the unusual circumstances and facts.
Adam Lanza and Nicholas Cruz are two diabolical supermen in the collective mind. When everything the American people believe is false, we will know the success of our misinformation efforts. Indeed, it is easier to fool a man than it is to explain to him how he has been fooled.
Unproved assertions are the food of the masses.
As I said there is no such thing as an "official narrative" there is just facts and evidence (of which you have none). Sure you can make up all kinds of stories and guesses, but in the end you are asking everyone to believe stories and guesses.
It would be rational to look at public record and dispute evidence based on evidence that contradicts that evidence. But the evidence of Sandy Hook has not been shown to wrong. What has been done by conspiracy theorists is to take evidence and replace it with their own narrative/misinformation. The when challenged on such things the conspiracy theorists do not provide any evidence for their position, or evidence for not believing public record.
This is what we are faced with as an argument from Conspiracy theorists: Evidence and eyewitnesses concludes x. The conspiracy theorists reject x and try to replace x with guess y, y1. y2, y3, y4, y5, etc and on and on without ever having evidence. The evidence that they claim to have when examined turns out to just be something claimed by someone pretending to be an expert that just happens to be profiting on the subject, by selling products that make more claims that they were unable to backup.
So what is your evidence that Sandy Hook was a hoax? You need to understand that making a claim is not evidence. Refusing to accept evidence with nothing more than asserting that you cannot be duped is not evidence. Not trusting the government is not evidence. Claiming that there is some grand conspiracy is not evidence. Can you actually do anything more than make unsubstantiated claims? Also telling non-conspiracy theorists that they are being duped is nothing more than a personal attack and an attempt to shut someone up that you disagree with.
Because you are not aware of it does not mean there was no official narrative. There is, but somehow it's too sophisticated for you to grasp.
A condensed version of it is that AL woke up one morning, shot his mother in her bed, and proceeded to drive to the school with a load of guns and ammo in the car, walked into the school and shot a bunch of people, mostly his classmates and a few adults. As I recall he then turned his own cold hand on himself.
Of course the Devil is in the Details, and most folks prefer not to go there, like you. In your tortured opinion, there is no official narrative, demonstrating just how blissfully ignorant of the story you are and how deeply in denial of the facts you are.
Not to worry sir, life goes on without you.
What the **** are talking about? Certainly not the massacre in Newtown thats for sure. 20 year old Adam Lanza fatally shot 20 children between six and seven years old, as well as six adult staff members, after killing his mom. He had no classmates FFS ages 6-7
Dude at least learn the basics about a subject before making up crap about it. This is beyond pathetic and you just showed everyone how ignorant that you are about Newtown. No one should take you seriously FFS.
I am talking about way more than you can comprehend.
Happy Holidays!
Dude tell me why you said that Adam Lanza killed his classmates?
He probably didn't. He was an unskilled and untrained frail young man firing a "long gun" inside classrooms at small targets.
But the media wants me to believe that he killed those kids. I'm highly skeptical to say the least.
Classmates?walked into the school and shot a bunch of people, mostly his classmates and a few adults.
Like I said above, I know see why he said that Lanza carried his own weight in guns and ammo (just over 30 lbs.) He thought Lanza was a "scrawny" 6 YEAR OLD as the AVERAGE weight of a 6 year old is 45 lbs.It was a grade school it is impossible for him to kill classmates, just admit that you were wrong and ignorant of the facts.
Because you are not aware of it does not mean there was no official narrative. There is, but somehow it's too sophisticated for you to grasp.
A condensed version of it is that AL woke up one morning, shot his mother in her bed, and proceeded to drive to the school with a load of guns and ammo in the car, walked into the school and shot a bunch of people, mostly his classmates and a few adults. As I recall he then turned his own cold hand on himself.
Of course the Devil is in the Details, and most folks prefer not to go there, like you. In your tortured opinion, there is no official narrative, demonstrating just how blissfully ignorant of the story you are and how deeply in denial of the facts you are.
Not to worry sir, life goes on without you.
I am talking about way more than you can comprehend.
Happy Holidays!
He probably didn't. He was an unskilled and untrained frail young man firing a "long gun" inside classrooms at small targets.
But the media wants me to believe that he killed those kids. I'm highly skeptical to say the least.
Like I said above, I know see why he said that Lanza carried his own weight in guns and ammo (just over 30 lbs.) He thought Lanza was a "scrawny" 6 YEAR OLD as the AVERAGE weight of a 6 year old is 45 lbs.
Like I said above, I know see why he said that Lanza carried his own weight in guns and ammo (just over 30 lbs.) He thought Lanza was a "scrawny" 6 YEAR OLD as the AVERAGE weight of a 6 year old is 45 lbs.
This is actually alarming to see happen,
Agreed.This it too funny really, That someone is that ignorant about a subject that he doesnt know such basic details. No wonder he does not believe the so called "official story".
It just shows the mentality of the "truther". Believe everything at face value as long as it goes against the government. I'm in a debate at another forum where someone claimed that a 757 couldn't have hit the Pentagon because scaling a top down photo using the security camera view shows the plane couldn't have fit behind the gate lifting mechanism.
This person used a RULER and physically measured his screen in millimeters. We went back and forth. He claimed that using pixels as measurement instead of a ruler was "inaccurate".
He eventually admitted he was wrong. The reason he was wrong? He was all "caffeined up" and read his ruler backwards.
This is the kind of "facts" truthers are using to make their claims.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?