• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Protests over Missouri teen's death turn violent[W:647,807]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Excon said:
Appeasement?
Click to expand...


Something to that affect.....huh? Considering Holder and BO were looking into and conducting a Civil Rights Investigation.



Also Friday, the Justice Department confirmed in a statement that FBI agents had conducted several interviews with witnesses as part of a civil-rights investigation into Brown's death. In the days ahead, the agents planned to canvass the neighborhood where the shooting happened, seeking more information, the statement said.....snip~

Gov declares emergency, imposes curfew in Ferguson
 

Okay. How about appearance of appeasement?

When the Police were replaced they were appeased and settled down for a while, only to later realize they weren't going to get what they wanted, so acted up again.
And this force had to act the same as the original.

Which just shows it wasn't the original force that was the problem. :shrug:
 

I'd be willing to bet that gangs, the same ones that have been selling drugs in the neighborhood where the riots took place, were involved in the violence. As for the rancher in Nevada, no gangs involved there, just the Sovereign Citizens. Taking away the financial incentive to form gangs wouldn't end all of the violence in the US, but would certainly mitigate it.
 


Former Cops Speak Out About Police Militarization

Instead, the divide appears to be more generational. Older and retired cops don't seem to like were policing is headed. (This is a generalization and an observation -- I haven't taken any polls.) Younger cops, who are nudging policing in a more militaristic direction, are naturally fine with it. Retired police Lt. Diane Goldstein, for example, wrote about the book and her concerns over militarization here at Huffington Post, as did retired NYPD Det. John Baeza over at Law Enforcement Against Prohibition.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/01/cops-speak-out-on-police-_n_3688999.html

How the War on Terror Has Militarized the Police

Over the past 10 years, law enforcement officials have begun to look and act more and more like soldiers. Here's why we should be alarmed.

http://www.theatlantic.com/national...-on-terror-has-militarized-the-police/248047/

http://www.economist.com/news/unite...-have-become-too-militarised-cops-or-soldiers
 
Last edited:

And criminals have escalated to look, and act more like terrorists....So what's your solution? de-arm the police? You want to see more cops dead in the line of duty?
 
j-mac said:
And criminals have escalated to look, and act more like terrorists....So what's your solution? de-arm the police? You want to see more cops dead in the line of duty?
Click to expand...

What a ridiculous claim, back that **** up. What you have to say on this pales when compared to what former law enforcement is saying.
 
Montecresto said:
What a ridiculous claim, back that **** up. What you have to say on this pales when compared to what former law enforcement is saying.
Click to expand...

Wow, you found a couple of retired democrat cops that parrot what you want to put forth in your propaganda, and that is all you need...Typical blinded support of an agenda...

I asked you a question I noticed you wouldn't address. Care to now?
 

The fact is that criminals are better armed than police. To listen to some in here they would be happy to see more cops killed in the line of duty rather than ensure their own safety.
 
j-mac said:
Wow, you found a couple of retired democrat cops that parrot what you want to put forth in your propaganda, and that is all you need...Typical blinded support of an agenda...

I asked you a question I noticed you wouldn't address. Care to now?
Click to expand...

How do you know what there politics are, and why politics would have any bearing on such a topic. The CATO institute is quite conservative and they have an extensive policy paper on this quoted. This isn't a partisan issue, much as you would like to make it one. Otherwise there seemed to be no reason to respond to your silly question that the police might be disarmed.
 

You offer no way for police to respond to dangerous situations like what is happening in Ferguson, yet want everyone to believe you have a better answer...It's laughable....
 
j-mac said:
The fact is that criminals are better armed than police. To listen to some in here they would be happy to see more cops killed in the line of duty rather than ensure their own safety.
Click to expand...

What an asinine thing to say. You just keep digging your **** hole deeper. Quote one person in this thread that has said "they would be happy to see more cops killed".
 

In one word...absolutely. They are NOT civilized. "We" be mistreated 200 or 300 years back and you white piece of **** are going to keep paying the price....FOREVER. YOU OWE US.
 
This is exactly what was not needed.



 
DrPepper said:
It was 2 before the thief got shot and the third was the thief.
Click to expand...

Alright. Amazing. rampant crime. Thank goodness you and the Ferguson police have adopted the Judge Dredd style judicial system.
 
poweRob said:
Alright. Amazing. rampant crime. Thank goodness you and the Ferguson police have adopted the Judge Dredd style judicial system.
Click to expand...

Only you would think that 3 deaths in a week is not a bad thing. Thankfully no one else has to depend on you to keep them safe.
 
DrPepper said:
Only you would think that 3 deaths in a week is not a bad thing. Thankfully no one else has to depend on you to keep them safe.
Click to expand...

Riiiigggght. You are the one claiming to be on the side of the shooters and not the dead are you not? So what's your complaint?
 
HogWash said:
In one word...absolutely. They are NOT civilized. "We" be mistreated 200 or 300 years back and you white piece of **** are going to keep paying the price....FOREVER. YOU OWE US.
Click to expand...

What do you call it when someone pretends to be in the head of an entire race and does a really ridiculous broad sweep generalization of them?
 
poweRob said:
Riiiigggght. You are the one claiming to be on the side of the shooters and not the dead are you not? So what's your complaint?
Click to expand...

Your the one who didnt see anything wrong with people dying and considered it normal behavior. Perhaps you dont like black people?
 
poweRob said:
oh noes... next thing they'll be doing those terrorist fist jabs.
Click to expand...
Your ignorant levity serve no purpose.
It is seriously lack of judgement to march with the demonstrators who are marching in opposition to the police, and in showing any comradery with any criminal element.
 
This whole issue is a freaking joke. These people looting are animals. The black panther party, sharpton, and the rest are animals. They don't have 1 bit of information on this case and yet they side with the deceased because he is black. Racist bastards.

It is sad that the news organizations pump more fuel into this fire. We know nothing about this case. And yet rioting has occurred.
 
DrPepper said:
Your the one who didnt see anything wrong with people dying and considered it normal behavior. Perhaps you dont like black people?
Click to expand...

lol... just keep rooting for the shooters while you try to do this whole backwards flip around.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…