reflechissez
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2019
- Messages
- 25,197
- Reaction score
- 18,767
- Location
- Wakanda
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Meh. A whole lot of unprecedented stuff has happened over the last 6 years.I absolutely agree with that. There is a time and place for everything, and at night in front of a house is not the place to protest.
New accusers, and ford was an extremely credible witness.Ford is their star accuser and she was full of shit so....*shrug*
Particularly one where there has already been an assassination attempt on the home owner.I absolutely agree with that. There is a time and place for everything, and at night in front of a house is not the place to protest.
LOL... The drama....THAT'S a swarm? Right wingers are so extra.
First Amendment is a bitch. You can screw over all women, but it doesn't protect you from the results of your actions, liar!It was not the first time Kavanaugh's residence has been swarmed by protestors.
someday a person will get hurt, I hope it's an illegal protest, they should be arrested and charged.
I did not find swarming; it was the title, but it was misleading did not check deep enough and I am wrongDo you have pictures of the "swarming?"
As long as the protestors are peaceful I don't see the harm. Having said that, I honestly do not think protestors should protest at or around someone's home.It was not the first time Kavanaugh's residence has been swarmed by protestors.
someday a person will get hurt, I hope it's an illegal protest, they should be arrested and charged.
Either way, there where holes in her story big enough to drive a Zamboni through. She absolutely stayed away from giving a single specific detail that would give Kavanaugh a chance at proving his innocence. House/location? Nope. A time? Nope. Friend that was claimed to be a witness? She said it didn't happen.I wish they did a better job investigating all that at the time.
To me it seemed like a rushed job.
Wow…really causing a big ruckus.Video work?
This is exactly like how the left wants to have it. SCOTUS justices intimidated execute their duties, to render their rulings on the principal of law.It was not the first time Kavanaugh's residence has been swarmed by protestors.
someday a person will get hurt, I hope it's an illegal protest, they should be arrested and charged.
This is exactly like how the left wants to have it. SCOTUS justices intimidated execute their duties, to render their rulings on the principal of law.
Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, endeavors to influence, intimidate, or impede any grand or petit juror, or officer in or of any court of the United States, or officer who may be serving at any examination or other proceeding before any United States magistrate judge or other committing ma...
Uscode - 18 USC 1502
Historical and Revision Notes. Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 661 (R.S. 5277). Said section 661 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., was incorporated in this section and section 752 of this title.. Words "an extradition agent of the United States" were substituted for "such agent" which was referred to in sections 3182 et seq. of this title.. A fine of "$300" was substituted for ...Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by...
Never mind how federally illegal it is, this how the left wants it.
And yet, it is the left the audacity to constantly accuse others of being Fascist.
Go figure. So absolutely clueless they are.
Why do you righties get that law wrong every single time? It's like you can't read.This is exactly like how the left wants to have it. SCOTUS justices intimidated execute their duties, to render their rulings on the principal of law.
Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, endeavors to influence, intimidate, or impede any grand or petit juror, or officer in or of any court of the United States, or officer who may be serving at any examination or other proceeding before any United States magistrate judge or other committing ma...
Uscode - 18 USC 1502
Historical and Revision Notes. Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 661 (R.S. 5277). Said section 661 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., was incorporated in this section and section 752 of this title.. Words "an extradition agent of the United States" were substituted for "such agent" which was referred to in sections 3182 et seq. of this title.. A fine of "$300" was substituted for ...Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by...
Never mind how federally illegal it is, this how the left wants it.
And yet, it is the left the audacity to constantly accuse others of being Fascist.
Go figure. So absolutely clueless they are.
PROTIP: When copy/pasting, it is a good idea to actually read what you are copy/pasting, otherwise, like this time, you will look ****ing idiotic. In now way, under no interpretation of the law, in any rational mind, is anyone doing anything remotely like what is described in those laws.This is exactly like how the left wants to have it. SCOTUS justices intimidated execute their duties, to render their rulings on the principal of law.
Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, endeavors to influence, intimidate, or impede any grand or petit juror, or officer in or of any court of the United States, or officer who may be serving at any examination or other proceeding before any United States magistrate judge or other committing ma...
Uscode - 18 USC 1502
Historical and Revision Notes. Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 661 (R.S. 5277). Said section 661 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., was incorporated in this section and section 752 of this title.. Words "an extradition agent of the United States" were substituted for "such agent" which was referred to in sections 3182 et seq. of this title.. A fine of "$300" was substituted for ...Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by...
Never mind how federally illegal it is, this how the left wants it.
And yet, it is the left the audacity to constantly accuse others of being Fascist.
Go figure. So absolutely clueless they are.
He was the victim of a left wing smear campaign. But he got the last laugh. He's probably working out every day so he can live as long as possible.
This is exactly like how the left wants to have it. SCOTUS justices intimidated execute their duties, to render their rulings on the principal of law.
Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, endeavors to influence, intimidate, or impede any grand or petit juror, or officer in or of any court of the United States, or officer who may be serving at any examination or other proceeding before any United States magistrate judge or other committing ma...
Uscode - 18 USC 1502
Historical and Revision Notes. Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 661 (R.S. 5277). Said section 661 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., was incorporated in this section and section 752 of this title.. Words "an extradition agent of the United States" were substituted for "such agent" which was referred to in sections 3182 et seq. of this title.. A fine of "$300" was substituted for ...Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by...
Never mind how federally illegal it is, this how the left wants it.
And yet, it is the left the audacity to constantly accuse others of being Fascist.
Go figure. So absolutely clueless they are.
A rather indefensible position that you assert that the protestors around conservative SCOTUS residences weren't 'Influencing or injuring' or that it wasn't 'picketing or parading' the justices.PROTIP: When copy/pasting, it is a good idea to actually read what you are copy/pasting, otherwise, like this time, you will look ****ing idiotic. In now way, under no interpretation of the law, in any rational mind, is anyone doing anything remotely like what is described in those laws.
He's not a rapist, so there is that.
Do you think he was pressured to change his vote by protesters who where protesting his actions some years ago?A rather indefensible position that you assert that the protestors around conservative SCOTUS residences weren't 'Influencing or injuring' or that it wasn't 'picketing or parading' the justices.
Doesn't that contradict already the well established facts of the matter?
Nah, he loves him his beer too much.He's probably working out every day so he can live as long as possible.
Proof is not required outside a court of law. Circumstantial evidence is sufficient for informed opinions.Because he hasn't been proven to be. Add in that Ford is their star accuser and she was demonstrated to be full of shit, so there is that.
Prove he's a rapist.You'd support a rapist over people exercising their right to assemble?
Because he hasn't been proven to be. Add in that Ford is their star accuser and she was demonstrated to be full of shit, so there is that.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?