So argues the editorial board of the Dallas Morning News:
A deal in which America protects Dreamers and gives them a clear and simple path to citizenship while offering real protection on the border would be a way for both the President and Democratic leaders to walk away from this shutdown as winners. What's more, the American people would support them. https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/editorials/2019/01/17/protect-dreamers-build-wall-can-win
Is this a compromise you could live with?
So argues the editorial board of the Dallas Morning News:
A deal in which America protects Dreamers and gives them a clear and simple path to citizenship while offering real protection on the border would be a way for both the President and Democratic leaders to walk away from this shutdown as winners. What's more, the American people would support them. https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/editorials/2019/01/17/protect-dreamers-build-wall-can-win
Is this a compromise you could live with?
So argues the editorial board of the Dallas Morning News:
A deal in which America protects Dreamers and gives them a clear and simple path to citizenship while offering real protection on the border would be a way for both the President and Democratic leaders to walk away from this shutdown as winners. What's more, the American people would support them. https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/editorials/2019/01/17/protect-dreamers-build-wall-can-win
Is this a compromise you could live with?
Yeah but the trouble is, Trump's base can't, that's amnesty for folks. There's no way thy give DACA. This isn't happening, there will be no wall and No DACA. Eventually somehow they will have to open the government, but neither DACA nor the wll will ever happen. Too much fear of browning to ever allow for DACA, and even Republicans in Washington know this is only about a win for Trump, and is irrelevant to border security, othter than wasting some money.
If it could happen I wouldn't care, but it has like a -99%chance, so there's that.....
Less than a snowballs chance in HELL any of the hard right is EVER OK with DACA amnesty.
Oh, just stop it with your "browning of America" crap.
And think for a second about where Dallas is and what Texas is. (Hint: It used to be part of Mexico, so it's always been partly "brown.") :doh
https://www.texastribune.org/2018/0...e-become-biggest-population-group-state-2022/
I can live with the conditions that the editorial proposes as a starting point in negotiations and I suspect Trump could also. After all, he has constantly asked for negotiations. However, I haven't seen any indication that either Pelosi or Schumer care about the Dreamers all that much nor any indication from them that they even want to negotiate.
It takes two to tango and one of the dance partners prefers to get out of town.
So argues the editorial board of the Dallas Morning News:
A deal in which America protects Dreamers and gives them a clear and simple path to citizenship while offering real protection on the border would be a way for both the President and Democratic leaders to walk away from this shutdown as winners. What's more, the American people would support them. https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/editorials/2019/01/17/protect-dreamers-build-wall-can-win
Is this a compromise you could live with?
I don't want the wall. Its not a one time cost. Its a permanent cost.
Let's see what the President has to say today. Maybe he'll offer a compromise.
So argues the editorial board of the Dallas Morning News:
A deal in which America protects Dreamers and gives them a clear and simple path to citizenship while offering real protection on the border would be a way for both the President and Democratic leaders to walk away from this shutdown as winners. What's more, the American people would support them. https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/editorials/2019/01/17/protect-dreamers-build-wall-can-win
Is this a compromise you could live with?
I think this dreamers-for-wall part of the negotiation no longer exists. I think the only purpose of proposing it in the first place was to show how unassailable dems were on their position of no wall.
So argues the editorial board of the Dallas Morning News:
A deal in which America protects Dreamers and gives them a clear and simple path to citizenship while offering real protection on the border would be a way for both the President and Democratic leaders to walk away from this shutdown as winners. What's more, the American people would support them. https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/editorials/2019/01/17/protect-dreamers-build-wall-can-win
Is this a compromise you could live with?
So argues the editorial board of the Dallas Morning News:
A deal in which America protects Dreamers and gives them a clear and simple path to citizenship while offering real protection on the border would be a way for both the President and Democratic leaders to walk away from this shutdown as winners. What's more, the American people would support them. https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/editorials/2019/01/17/protect-dreamers-build-wall-can-win
Is this a compromise you could live with?
So argues the editorial board of the Dallas Morning News:
A deal in which America protects Dreamers and gives them a clear and simple path to citizenship while offering real protection on the border would be a way for both the President and Democratic leaders to walk away from this shutdown as winners. What's more, the American people would support them. https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/editorials/2019/01/17/protect-dreamers-build-wall-can-win
Is this a compromise you could live with?
Deny all you like, fear of BROWNING OF THE VOTE, is very real and very much behind the immigration debate.
"Compromise" isn't the word when one party has a gun to 800K heads.
Actually its the politicians that "win" in these stupid lets make a deal legislative efforts. They get to avoid doing the hard work required to actually "Legislate" and instead just give up in both directions and declare victory while the "people" lose. Thanks but no thanks.
I am asking you to focus. The editorial was written by a TEXAS newspaper's editorial board. You are missing my point entirely. But don't presume to speak for Texans.
You don't think ending the government shutdown would be a win?
I don't even know what you mean here. But I'm guessing that you aren't in favor of any compromise?
I can live with the conditions that the editorial proposes as a starting point in negotiations and I suspect Trump could also. After all, he has constantly asked for negotiations. However, I haven't seen any indication that either Pelosi or Schumer care about the Dreamers all that much nor any indication from them that they even want to negotiate.
It takes two to tango and one of the dance partners prefers to get out of town.
The president is attempting to starve and otherwise inflict suffering on hundreds of thousands of American citizens (soon to be tens of millions if this continues another week or two and impacts SNAP funding) to further his agenda. Rewarding that sort of sociopathic behavior and encouraging its recurrence is lunacy.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?