Sorry, what? Observing makes you creative?! No.Considering step 1 of the Scientific method is observation/question of course scientists are creative.
Look, mang, you can believe whatever you want, good science takes creativity.False.
okLook, mang, you can believe whatever you want, good science takes creativity.
Never mind, this isn't an argument worth having.Theoretical physicists can be interesting. But as Sean Carroll said, most scientists say, "shut up and calculate."
Have the day you deserve.Never mind, this isn't an argument worth having.
Have a nice sunday.
There is a movement of "Stem bros" who think only STEM is important. I used to be kinda like that. However I figured it won't work. Technology ultimately is tied to ones culture and culture is defined by it's arts.
Just look at the inventors during the Renaissance and early modern period. Let's say Da vinci They were often fluent in both the arts and sciences.
That's all fine but you don't teach history, patriotism, duty, loyalty to country, work ethic, you are going to loose your nation. We have a real problem with some who don't want to teach those things by teaching history and tradition of America.There is a movement of "Stem bros" who think only STEM is important. I used to be kinda like that. However I figured it won't work. Technology ultimately is tied to ones culture and culture is defined by it's arts.
Just look at the inventors during the Renaissance and early modern period. Let's say Da vinci They were often fluent in both the arts and sciences.
How do you teach “patriotism” with out indoctrination?That's all fine but you don't teach history, patriotism, duty, loyalty to country, work ethic, you are going to loose your nation. We have a real problem with some who don't want to teach those things by teaching history and tradition of America.
How do you teach “patriotism” with out indoctrination?
History is taught in every school in the US.That's all fine but you don't teach history, patriotism, duty, loyalty to country, work ethic, you are going to loose your nation. We have a real problem with some who don't want to teach those things by teaching history and tradition of America.
Next thing will be specific salute to the leader…..History is taught in every school in the US.
Why on earth would anyone teach “patriotism” or “loyalty to country” in schools? Schools aren’t supposed to be indoctrination camps, right?
Creativity is what came up with string theory.I don't think of scientists being creative.
I guess. Then accountants, ballerinas, and engineers are creative. As are elementary school teachers, bus drivers, and policemen.Creativity is what came up with string theory.
Imagination. To be a good scientist, you have to have a phenomenal imagination.
Certain kinds of accounting requires creativity, yes. Some, less so. Hence the variety of personality types that are drawn to that field.I guess. Then accountants, ballerinas, and engineers are creative. As are elementary school teachers, bus drivers, and policemen.
So, everyone is creative.Certain kinds of accounting requires creativity, yes. Some, less so. Hence the variety of personality types that are drawn to that field.
Engineers are 100% creative. They DESIGN shit.
Of course it takes creativity to figure out how to get little kids to focus and learn! Of course, some teachers are better than others.
Bus drivers? Not sure about that one.
Police? Maybe a detective, sure.
Except bus drivers.So, everyone is creative.
Not the topic of the thread.You know what? How about, instead of applying blanket stereotypes to people based on careers...we evaluate folks based on their individual traits and characteristics?
Then why did you bring it up, lol?Not the topic of the thread.
Everyone is creative. Okay.Then why did you bring it up, lol?
Are you suggesting there were more artists like DaVinci during the Renaissance?There is a movement of "Stem bros" who think only STEM is important. I used to be kinda like that. However I figured it won't work. Technology ultimately is tied to ones culture and culture is defined by it's arts.
Just look at the inventors during the Renaissance and early modern period. Let's say Da vinci They were often fluent in both the arts and sciences.
Except you, apparently.Everyone is creative. Okay.
Have the day you deserve.
You don't need to be anti-Arts to be pro-STEM but the arts people often do get above themselves. Someone told me that Isaac Asimov couldn't write.There is a movement of "Stem bros" who think only STEM is important. I used to be kinda like that. However I figured it won't work. Technology ultimately is tied to ones culture and culture is defined by it's arts.
Just look at the inventors during the Renaissance and early modern period. Let's say Da vinci They were often fluent in both the arts and sciences.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?