- Joined
- Sep 16, 2007
- Messages
- 9,796
- Reaction score
- 2,590
- Location
- out yonder
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
Please, I ask again, be original. That tried old tactic was dead after the civil war. There is no socialist agenda. That is make believe and a pruely partisan attack effort.
Also GM is getting ready for an IPO.
So they should not do what the said they would when campaigning? That makes no sense
I don't know what you're talking about, but there is no socialist agenda, state or otherwise. Be original in your fear mongering. This is a very unoriginal tactic.
I don't know what you're talking about, but there is no socialist agenda, state or otherwise. Be original in your fear mongering. This is a very unoriginal tactic.
I think that this would make a nice subject for a debate in this seldom used part of DP “is Obama a closet socialist “.
Any “conservative” takers?
Battle Grounds and Disputations
You mean Obama is selling to China
I don't know what you're talking about, but there is no socialist agenda, state or otherwise. Be original in your fear mongering. This is a very unoriginal tactic.
GM actually makes money in China, and sold more cars in China last year then in the US or close to it
I think that this would make a nice subject for a debate in this seldom used part of DP “is Obama a closet socialist “.
Any “conservative” takers?
Battle Grounds and Disputations
You better wake up, Boo, and realize the consequences of you being wrong instead of being so arrogant and refusing to admit it.
Bangkok Post : PM: Yuan should replace dollar
I'm not wrong. Factually, we are not a socialism and nothing Obama is doing makes or moves toward being a socialism. Reread the definition of socialism.
I am saying those elected have a mandate to do what they campaigned on such as getting rid of Obamacare
As many people actually like what is Obama care, they may be less happy than you knw when it is gone. That's the trouble with misleading like so many did. Let people know that we'll go back to not having pre-existing conditions covered, or having children not covered, for example, and see how that flies. It's easy to get suport through misleading, but harder to hide the results of your actions later on.
BTW, you move here was a topic change. I don't mind, but it gets confusing when you don't signal that you're going to change the topic.
As many people actually like what is Obama care, they may be less happy than you knw when it is gone. That's the trouble with misleading like so many did. Let people know that we'll go back to not having pre-existing conditions covered, or having children not covered, for example, and see how that flies. It's easy to get suport through misleading, but harder to hide the results of your actions later on.
BTW, you move here was a topic change. I don't mind, but it gets confusing when you don't signal that you're going to change the topic.
I stayed on the topic we had been discussing that the GOP has a mandate to do what they said they would
Seems we were talking about the poor tried old tactic of fearmiongering folks as socialist. You started calling him a socialist, which is false.
But, as people are divided concerning what needs to be done with healthcare, as I showed you states on, those new leaders may not knwo exactly what their mandate is. If 1/3 want it repealed, and 1/3 want more added, and 1/3 want it as it is, exactly what is their mandate?
The Obama healthcare bill is a job killer and businesses aren't going to take the costs increases without affecting employment. You call that a scare tactic? I call it reality and coming from someone who actually ran a business.
Nonsense... The only things that affect a going business are people not buying, reliability, SS, overhead, expansion, overstocking, R and D, competitive prices, and since all companies with 20 or more employees will be forced to add medical coverage at the same rate, all will be equally affected, and all will raise prices to make up the difference.
Whether it means lay offs or not, is up to the employer who has many more cost effected things to consider than just higher health costs.
As a former business owner yourself, you must know that all phases of the operation are subject to costly changes anytime, anywhere, so why don't you be honest about it?
ricksfolly
Seems we were talking about the poor tried old tactic of fearmiongering folks as socialist. You started calling him a socialist, which is false.
But, as people are divided concerning what needs to be done with healthcare, as I showed you states on, those new leaders may not knwo exactly what their mandate is. If 1/3 want it repealed, and 1/3 want more added, and 1/3 want it as it is, exactly what is their mandate?
So that mens Obama should give them part ownership?
What matters is what the people that elected them want. The tea party is making progress because people are fed up with democrats.
Nope, the tea party got traction because their message was simple, easy to understand by scared people, with IQs of a chimp, looking for any kind of salvation.
ricksfolly
Spoken like a true Liberal. You clearly know nothing about the Tea Party except what you're told to think by the Obamedia, like the retards on MSNBC.
The left is so afraid the Tea Party they do nothing but make up one lie after another, and the Media never tells the truth about the wide range of economic, ethnic, and Political Party affiliations of the members.
Like Obama likes to say: "If at first you don't succeed lie, lie, again."
How do you spin the lose of jobs into a positive? Ask any dumb ass like Obama, he'll tell you how it is a positive step in the right direction because we are working the job problem by going in the opposite direction so that when we get all the way around we'll be at the front of the line in stead of at the back, where we are today. And his stupid followers will say oh yea that makes sense.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?