No. It is your opinion that is ignored for being wrong.That's your opinion, which you are entitled to and I will ignore.
:dohYou might want to take a look at this article : Grand jury to hear evidence in Michael Brown case | MSNBC
I have none. I am not making any claims though eitherI read it in the news reports.
What evidence do you have that he didn't have his hands up?
Fill us in.
The evidence show he couldn't have had his hands up when sot, so where did you get the idea he did have his hands up?
From many news reports.
Where do you get your ideas from?
Were you a 360 degree eye-witness, watching from all sides? If not, you don't know any more than the rest of us know, so cool it.
From many news reports.
Where do you get your ideas from?
Were you a 360 degree eye-witness, watching from all sides? If not, you don't know any more than the rest of us know, so cool it.
No. It is your opinion that is ignored for being wrong.
:doh
Why?
I was the first person to make such a topic. Why do you think that is relevant?
Or is it that you too think a GJ who determines if one is charged is somehow a court, when it isn't.
Take a look at this.
Police Shove CNN’s Don Lemon | Ring of Fire
You don't think this might lend a little credibility to the claims that the cops are part of the problem here
The cops are definitely part of the problem with the riots and protests. It's evidently pent-up anger.
.But it does not tell us anything about Wilson's character
That's odd, as I am sure that was made clear to you.If the grand jury files charges where will this case go?
We may learn something about that if this ends up in court.
You are not making any sense.
It should not be going through the Courts at all. What do you not understand about that? Or is it that you think a GJ is a Court?
I can assure you it isn't. All that is, is asking the People through a jury to decided if he should be charged with a crime. Nothing ironic there.
So on to the next.
If it makes it that far (a court) it will already have been a travesty of Justice.
Is this what you do not understand?
If so, why?
If a case shouldn't be going through the courts as stated above, it making it to the Courts would be a travesty of Justice.
So please explain where you see Irony?
That is another weird thing about this second autopsy. When that autopsy was conducted Brown had already been embalmed and prepped for burial. How thoroughly was the body cleaned before that second autopsy?
I said this a couple of days ago and was told, assuredly, that if the body was cleaned during or after the first autopsy that would be tampering with evidence. However, it seems logical to me that to do a thorough examination of the entire body, the body would have to be cleaned up at some point or parts of the skin surface would not be visible. I'm with you on this point, to hell with those claiming conspiracy.
The "A Punk Is a Hunk" PreachersCop shootings and self defense shootings don't bring order. Especially in cases where it could be avoided. Speaking generally because this case is not clear yet.
I said this a couple of days ago and was told, assuredly, that if the body was cleaned during or after the first autopsy that would be tampering with evidence. However, it seems logical to me that to do a thorough examination of the entire body, the body would have to be cleaned up at some point or parts of the skin surface would not be visible. I'm with you on this point, to hell with those claiming conspiracy.
Take a look at this.
Police Shove CNN’s Don Lemon | Ring of Fire
You don't think this might lend a little credibility to the claims that the cops are part of the problem here
So which was it? Do AG's push an agenda, or just AG's at work during democratic presidencies.
That's odd, as I am sure that was made clear to you.
It would be where it doesn't belong. Which will then be a travesty of Justice.
But I doubt there is any worry of that happening as the evidence is pretty clear.
I know which way the bullets were pointed when they came out of the barrel of the gun.
If Brown was prepped for burial after autopsy, there's been a breach of protocol. No wonder the AG's stepping in.
Just Eric Holder as far as I can tell.
Lmao, you're saying the Ferguson PD has no history of corruption? You sure about that or do I need to post the links again?
Let's start with the fact that the organization seems to enjoy beating suspects:
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - The Daily Beast
The fact that it cooks the numbers on its misconduct allegations:
Before Mike Brown Shooting, Ferguson Police Department Had History Of Misconduct Allegations
Then there are the constant and recorded threats by police to reports. The fact that they've released supposedly damning information only to later claim it is not relevant to the shooting itself etc. Yeah, this department is corrupt, that it's protecting one of their own is no shock.
No doubt this and no doubt that.No doubt there will be a grand jury, and more. The grand jury and other investigations will assemble the facts and determine if the facts warrant further actions, some of which can be legal action against, or the arrest of, Officer Wilson and/or members of the Ferguson Police Department or more.
You are talking nonsense. Do try to stay relevant.You apparently believe you have ALL the facts and believe that you alone are the arbiter of truth. You seem to believe that justice begins and ends with you. :roll:
You'll pardon the rest of us while we fart in your general direction.
The Courts will likely not be involved as the known evidence is in his favor.The court(s) will likely make the final decision on that.
Whether you like it or not.
I doubt that they'll be asking for your opinion.
AG is partially involved because there's reason to believe the assassinated man's civil rights were violated. 9 out of 10 traffic stops made in Ferguson were black people. The NAACP filed complaints last year.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?