Indeed . Since 1900 some 52 people have been killed by police in England. Thats less than half the number killed by US law enforcement in March 2015 alone (111). Even allowing for six fold the population disparity thats quite a statistic ! :shock:
As has been proven a hundred times in reference to the reports cited in your links, the "per capita" conclusion is false, and contrived. All your cites are using data that is incomplete, or non-specific. Nothing of real substance can be concluded from the information.
Your 52 people killed by police in England is equally false.
The British advocacy group Inquest has looked at police incidents in England and Wales going back to 1990. By its count, there were 55 police shooting deaths between 1990 and the present. The group reports another 1,453 deaths that had some connection to contact with police. However, the causes range from someone dying of a drug overdose while at a police station, to car thieves killing themselves in a wreck, to suicide while in custody, to excessive use of force by officers.
There simply is no way to tease out the details. Comparing police shootings to the American data is the only reliable approach.
The only other country in the United Kingdom for which we found hard numbers was Northern Ireland. Between April 2008 and September 2014, roughly a six-year period, members of the Police Force of Northern Ireland discharged their weapons nine times. However, there is no data on whether any deaths resulted.
During the times of "The Troubles" from 1968 to about 2000 when separatists, generally Catholics, and unionists, generally Protestants, battled over whether Northern Ireland should break away or remain part of the United Kingdom, there were over 3,000 deaths. Some of those were at the hands of the police.
Again, you are welcome to present flawed data from advocacy groups anxious to manipulate data and present flawed information, but don't expect them to be taken as anything other than activist propaganda.
Are there more deaths at the hands of police in general, than in the U.K.? I would have to agree that is true. Is the picture you're painting highly biased and slanted? Absolutely true, as the facts prove.
Again, at the very least, you don't have to worry about it, other than to push your agenda.