• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Planned Infanticide[W:17]

P

Paleocon

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 21, 2013
Messages
13,309
Reaction score
1,307
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
Why should the government fund an organization that kill babies?
 
Re: Planned Infanticide

It shouldn't. But something tells me we have differing views of what a baby is.
 
Re: Planned Infanticide

Paleocon said:
Why should the government fund an organization that kill babies?
Click to expand...

Because we must feed our dark lord Abbazorkzog who rules nations through his carefully-selected genome of shapeshifting reptilian demons and their thirteen descendant bloodlines from the Twelfth Planet...lest thou swallow thy Hallowed Earth.
 
Re: Planned Infanticide

Paleocon said:
Why should the government fund an organization that kill babies?
Click to expand...

Because most babies killed are the offspring of religious people, and it is desirable that there be less of them.
 
Re: Planned Infanticide

Paleocon said:
Why should the government fund an organization that kill babies?
Click to expand...

Why not? Just define them as non-babies and hey presto! That's what the Germans did in the 1930's with the handicapped. It works very well.
 
Re: Planned Infanticide

joG said:
Why not? Just define them as non-babies and hey presto! That's what the Germans did in the 1930's with the handicapped. It works very well.
Click to expand...

image.webp
 
Re: Planned Infanticide

joG said:
Why not? Just define them as non-babies and hey presto! That's what the Germans did in the 1930's with the handicapped. It works very well.
Click to expand...

Seventh post!

Who had the seventh post for the Godwin lottery?
 
Re: Planned Infanticide

Redress said:
View attachment 67198676
Click to expand...

You see? People often are so irresponsible as to not even know the thinking that led to the mass murders in history. Very often they do not understand the way societies run the risk of degeneration to mass murder. Instead of learning and thinking they use some stupid knee jerk response they also do not understand and think that their answer sounds smart. Pity is, that such ignorance has a constituency. Why, I suspect, you have not even read the history of thinking behind the euthanasia that culminated in the Germany of the 1930's.
 
Re: Planned Infanticide

RogueWarrior said:
Seventh post!

Who had the seventh post for the Godwin lottery?
Click to expand...

You see? You do not even understand the cultural and legal similarities and differences of arguments between the thinking developed through the later 19th century on euthanasia that only culminated in 1930s Germany and that of our present mass killing of humans defined as killable. You think Godwin and get intellectual constipation. Or is it more a case of fearing, what you would find, if you thought it through?
 
Re: Planned Infanticide

spud_meister said:
Because most babies killed are the offspring of religious people, and it is desirable that there be less of them.
Click to expand...

How wrong can one get? Religious people decline abortion rights so you end up with MORE of them.
 
Re: Planned Infanticide

Moderator's Warning:
I'd suggest that people actually address the topic and STOP trying to derail it.
Also, moving this to the abortion forum which is a more appropriate place for this to be discussed.
 
Re: Planned Infanticide

joG said:
Why not? Just define them as non-babies and hey presto! That's what the Germans did in the 1930's with the handicapped. It works very well.
Click to expand...

Yep. That's absolutely right.
 
joG said:
The comment was meant for people that don't need the meaning spelt out. ;)
Click to expand...

Actually the comment was meant for people who don't get it. ;)
 
You had to know this was going to become a semantics thread from the first post, right?
 
jet57 said:
Actually the comment was meant for people who don't get it. ;)
Click to expand...

The Pentagon pays for baby killing every day, so I don't see the point of the OP.
 
JayDubya said:
You had to know this was going to become a semantics thread from the first post, right?
Click to expand...

Not semantics, but factual comparisons that show the idiocy of the OP.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom