If he needed to park close because he couldn't walk very far, then I would say yes, that is handicapped. But if he could walk around in a store, albeit even with some discomfort, then I say no, that is not in my opinion handicapped enough to need special parking privileges. Lots of men are capable of "toughening it up" because hey, we are men, right?
My father who was veteran and suffered from a degenerating back injury from when he was in the service was still tough as nails well into his 80s. He would have been ashamed to show weakness, especially when he knew guys missing limbs who wouldn't even use a handicapped spot.
There you go, you just made my entire point. Making things easier is not necessarily indicative of an actual threshold for NEED. This liberal notion that equality of results is a requirement, and not just equality of access. What you are describing is a sense of entitlement for pregnant women and seniors. Just because a woman is five weeks pregnant, doesn't make her handicapped. If she gets to 8 months, and is having mobility issues, then her doctor can issue a temporary handicapped permit if she needs one. But you know as well as I do, that if we are somehow giving pregnant women special status, many will take that, because hey--- everyone needs to be some type of victim in our society today, right?
And seniors may not be handicapped, or struggle to walk. They too, unless are handicapped, they can walk same as everyone else. Maybe not as fast, but that does not make them cripples.
My grandfather was 97 and would still give up his seat to a woman, even a young girl. But that is how MEN are supposed to act. Nothing special about that, it used to be a requirement for being considered a man.