- Joined
- Nov 24, 2009
- Messages
- 2,443
- Reaction score
- 733
- Location
- San Francisco
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
here for you, Chappy
although it's worth noting that her "cutting deficit spending has been a priority for us" claim yesterday borders on insane, if it's not falsehood.
Neither insane or false.
“When I became speaker of the House ... our majority made PAYGO the rule of the House -- that if you wanted to have an investment, an entitlement, etc., you had to pay for it. There was no open-ended spending.” — House Speaker Nancy Pelosi¹
Excerpted from “Pelosi touts Democrats' revival of 'pay-as-you-go' budget rules,” PolitiFact.com, emphasis added
[SIZE="+2"]I[/SIZE]t's an undeniable fact that the new Democratic majority in 2007 "made PAYGO the rule of the House," as she said. But the second part of her statement -- "if you wanted to have an investment, an entitlement, etc., you had to pay for it" -- contains some aspects that are misleading. Investments made with discretionary spending, from highway-building to elementary school aid, were never supposed to be subject to PAYGO. Nor were ordinary increases in entitlements. In addition, even for key bills that should have been subject to PAYGO, Democratic leaders have acted to waive the rule on several occasions. So we rate Pelosi's statement Half True.
“I do see a lot of bills proposed with offsets. The rule has caused Congress to think more carefully about the costs of what they pass.” — Marc Goldwein, Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget²