Compatibilist
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2010
- Messages
- 775
- Reaction score
- 270
- Location
- Bunkered in 5 klicks from city hall
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Nancy Pelosi calls for investigation into the funding of ground zero mosque. The funding of the oppostition to the mosque. I don't get it... she's got to be completely out of touch with the overwhelming majority of americans?? I think nearly 70% of americans are for locating this mosque elsewhere.
AUDIO - Rep. Pelosi calls for investigation of WTC mosque opposition - Washington Times
The above was yesterday and believe she has since backtracked [after outrage] and called to also look into building fund supporters.
Just because 70% of Americans don't like it doesn't mean that they don't have the right to build a mosque there. End of disscusion.
just because 70% of americans don't like it doesn't mean that they don't have the right to build a mosque there. End of disscusion.
wtf???????????
You heard him. End of discussion. What is your problem? You must be an Islamiphobe, Homophobe, Racist, illiterate Right wing militant tea bagger if you don't see the wisdom in ending this discussion.
You heard him. End of discussion. What is your problem? You must be an Islamiphobe, Homophobe, Racist, illiterate Right wing militant tea bagger if you don't see the wisdom in ending this discussion.
This is not mob rule. What about that do you NOT understand?I don't get it... she's got to be completely out of touch with the overwhelming majority of americans?? I think nearly 70% of americans are for locating this mosque elsewhere.
Nancy Pelosi calls for investigation into the funding of ground zero mosque. The funding of the oppostition to the mosque. I don't get it... she's got to be completely out of touch with the overwhelming majority of americans?? I think nearly 70% of americans are for locating this mosque elsewhere.
AUDIO - Rep. Pelosi calls for investigation of WTC mosque opposition - Washington Times
The above was yesterday and believe she has since backtracked [after outrage] and called to also look into building fund supporters.
sourceHouse Speaker Nancy Pelosi Wednesday morning called for “transparency” in the funding behind a planned Islamic community center and mosque being built blocks from ground zero. But she also said there should be similar openness about the money behind conservative attacks aimed at thwarting the project.
calm down. have a drink of cool water. and let yourself see what is before you.
the two positions are not incompatible - supporting both is not 'backtracking'. Pelosi has expressed, as millions have, the RIGHT of any religion to build places of worship equally. She has also stated that the issue of WHERE is a local matter... in this case, it is up to the State of NY. Very republican of her, eh?
she thinks that there are good reasons to question WHO and WHY there is such contention over the issue... whose agenda is being propagated.
sourceolitico
simple really. nothing nefarious here. move along.
geo.
I do believe this is more left stream media trickery.
Pelosi said on the 17th that there needed to be an investigation into those protesting the Mosque. She was curious about where the funding was coming from. Funding for protesters? She thinks 70% of Americans must be getting paid from someone? Talk about conspiracy theories.Anyway That's not my point. She said this while standing outside somewhere on a windy day, on or before the 17th.
I believe it was the 18th where she must have backtracked and ADDED that the FUNDING FOR the Mosqe should also be investigated. Wouldn't you think that should be the first thing we investigated? I mean that's what a lot of the protester were upset about. The fact that we don't know where the money is coming from is something to worry about.
Yes that's what I meant. But I think she only added the mosque funding the next day. for political reasons. A lot of people were complaining (probably only on Fox) and talk radio, about her wanting to investigate those protesting and not mentioning investigating the Imam or the Mosque funding. Then she decides to come out and change her tune somewhat the next day.If memory serves me, she added that the mosque funding should be investigated the next day. She never retracted her statement about investigating those who opposed the mosque being built near ground zero.
It's kind of difficult to do when they're not particularly mindful of it in other areas, such as in their war on Fox News.
Besides, what does it have to do with the election?
Actually, she said she "joins those" who call for investigating who's funding the protests. Who are these others?
What "war" on Fox news.
The majority of people are against the mosque, no reason to have an opinion on it that isn't backed by law.
Free speech goes both ways, sweetie.Liberals want to silence Fox. They can't take the heat, so they want to shut them up instead. Free speech for everyone but those on the right.
Liberals want to silence Fox. They can't take the heat, so they want to shut them up instead. Free speech for everyone but those on the right.
What "war" on Fox news.
The majority of people are against the mosque
no reason to have an opinion on it that isn't backed by law.
Proof?
Also there is a difference of wanting to silence Fox, and criticizing them for their obvious bias.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?