then compare to RudyWant to know what real dementia looks like?
See Newt.
Why does anyone let this pig near a mic any longer?Outrage as Newt Gingrich says Capitol attack investigators could be jailed
Liz Cheney among those to condemn remarks by former House speaker as committee member Zoe Lofgren says: ‘I think Newt has really lost it’www.theguardian.com
Once again, Republicans tell us all what they intend to do. And we're not listening to them. How much longer can we afford to wave it off as just rhetoric? They've told you what they intend to do. They want to overturn elections. They want to arrest political opposition. It's not just their party leads, how many times have we seen someone on this very message board say Democrats should be jailed as a threat to the nation?
They're telling you what they are going to do. Start listening.
Per our Roger Stone/Donnie Trump new reality show.They've got no choice but to cooperate within the bounds of the law.
The democrat party committee wanting to create a fiasco should be made to keep the inquiry a lawful and legitimate one and not a Media circus. Which of course is the whole point of the investigation to begin with. To create a media spectacle as far into the election year as possible.
It never was to investigate. There's thousands of hours of footage and any ameture detective could've wrapped this up a year ago.
I still wanna know how a bunch of knuckleheads managed to take over the ****ing Capitol and why they weren't washed out on a river of their own blood.
But that’s just me.
I know you’re not allowed to see it. But there’s a difference between protests about a real thing, police misbehavior, and rioting over a lie knowingly told.I don't have any problem prosecuting the people who tore shit up in the riot.
I also want the BLM and antifa people who set fire to police stations and courthouses prosecuted.
What downright pisses me off is the double standard applied here. And the fact that liberals are the type of people perfectly fine with law enforcement and government institutions discriminating based off political affiliation. As long as it's directed to people they don't like.
I wouldn't be okay with it if the roles were reversed. So I think it's chicken shit for liberals to be that way.
I know ho
I know you’re not allowed to see it. But there’s a difference between protests about a real thing, police misbehavior, and rioting over a lie knowingly told.
You might be able to slightly compare the two if anybody anywhere that doesn’t consume your media ageeed with.
But you can’t.
Nothing in that statement says anything about overturning the elections. What it actually IS talking about is abuse of power.Outrage as Newt Gingrich says Capitol attack investigators could be jailed
Liz Cheney among those to condemn remarks by former House speaker as committee member Zoe Lofgren says: ‘I think Newt has really lost it’www.theguardian.com
Once again, Republicans tell us all what they intend to do. And we're not listening to them. How much longer can we afford to wave it off as just rhetoric? They've told you what they intend to do. They want to overturn elections. They want to arrest political opposition. It's not just their party leads, how many times have we seen someone on this very message board say Democrats should be jailed as a threat to the nation?
They're telling you what they are going to do. Start listening.
Would you rather be punched for an unjust cause or murdered for one people think is just?I know ho
I know you’re not allowed to see it. But there’s a difference between protests about a real thing, police misbehavior, and rioting over a lie knowingly told.
You might be able to slightly compare the two if anybody anywhere that doesn’t consume your media ageeed with.
But you can’t.
Fine, you can advocate for more prosecutions related to the riots of the summer of 2020. But, they are completely different issues than what we are talking about here. If you don't understand that then you don't grasp the issues around the events of 1/6 and how they relate to Trump's efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election. Don't take my word for, several federal judges opined on this subject.I don't have any problem prosecuting the people who tore shit up in the riot.
I also want the BLM and antifa people who set fire to police stations and courthouses prosecuted.
What downright pisses me off is the double standard applied here. And the fact that liberals are the type of people perfectly fine with law enforcement and government institutions discriminating based off political affiliation. As long as it's directed to people they don't like.
I wouldn't be okay with it if the roles were reversed. So I think it's chicken shit for liberals to be that way.
Fine, you can advocate for more prosecutions related to the riots of the summer of 2020. But, they are completely different issues than what we are talking about here. If you don't understand that then you don't grasp the issues around the events of 1/6 and how they relate to Trump's efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election. Don't take my word for, several federal judges opined on this subject.
Two Trump-appointed judges reject comparisons between January 6 and Portland unrest | CNN Politics
Two Trump-appointed federal judges have rejected claims from January 6 defendants that they're being treated unfairly, because of their conservative politics, compared with left-leaning rioters in Portland, Oregon, in the summer of 2020.www.cnn.comFederal judge rejects comparisons between Capitol insurrection and racial justice unrest | CNN Politics
A federal judge rejected comparisons between the January 6 Capitol insurrection and civil unrest that at times accompanied racial-equity protests during a sentencing for a Capitol rioter on Monday, just days after a judge in the same court had questioned the difference.www.cnn.comBlack Lives Matter comparison roils court in Jan. 6 cases
Judges on the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., are clashing over how harshly to sentence the bulk of the Capitol rioters.www.politico.com
The only double standard is you attempting apply a common standard to fundamentally different things.
How ****ing retarded does one have to be to consider seeking fair treatment, even if by resorting to criminality the same as attempting to stop the peaceful transition of power to a duly elected president by shouting to hang the VP. etc. etc.?Except they're not fundamentally different at all. Only democrat party propoganda would think that.
Both advocated and incited violence for political benifits
How ****ing retarded does one have to be to consider seeking fair treatment, even if by resorting to criminality the same as attempting to stop the peaceful transition of power to a duly elected president by shouting to hang the VP. etc. etc.?
Trying to stop the peaceful transition of power to a duly elected President by a scumbag and his followers because the scumbag wanted to remain in power IS sedition and only the morons who still kiss his ass can not see that.In other words, you think shouting hang Mike pence during a riot is sedition.
But chanting death to America while setting fire to a federal courthouse with people trapped inside is just a peaceful protest.
Congratulations, here's your sign
Republcians have always been scum, they just have turned into terrorist scum now. they have been doing this dirty shit forever while they project to dems and their moron base believe itJailed for what? This is the same douche who started massive investigations into the Clintons and only came away with a semen stained dress. **** him.
I can't believe they pretend to have credibility posting such easily refuted, and also completely hypocritical bullshit. The people not being transparent are the guilty Trump people, suing to block data, not tesitfying.of all people asking for transparency. Let's ask trump and his people if they are being transparent and cooperating during this investigation.
yeah, right!
"if Republicans take Congress in November, “this is all going to come crashing down … they’re the ones who in fact, I think, face a real risk of jail for the kinds of laws they’re breaking”.Outrage as Newt Gingrich says Capitol attack investigators could be jailed
Liz Cheney among those to condemn remarks by former House speaker as committee member Zoe Lofgren says: ‘I think Newt has really lost it’www.theguardian.com
Once again, Republicans tell us all what they intend to do. And we're not listening to them. How much longer can we afford to wave it off as just rhetoric? They've told you what they intend to do. They want to overturn elections. They want to arrest political opposition. It's not just their party leads, how many times have we seen someone on this very message board say Democrats should be jailed as a threat to the nation?
They're telling you what they are going to do. Start listening.
If Donald Trump raped and murdered a cheerleader in 2004, he needs to be imprisoned."if Republicans take Congress in November, “this is all going to come crashing down … they’re the ones who in fact, I think, face a real risk of jail for the kinds of laws they’re breaking”.
I don't see him saying anything that you just wrote about. If they are breaking laws, then yes they need to be jailed.
Sure, I don't think anyone would disagree. How does this validate what you posted?If Donald Trump raped and murdered a cheerleader in 2004, he needs to be imprisoned.
No I'm not going to back up that statement with evidence. Why do you ask? If Donald Trump raped and murdered a cheerleader in 2004, shouldn't he be imprisoned? Why would anyone object to imprisoning Donald Trump if he raped and murdered a cheerleader in 2004!?
Surely, we all agree that it's not ok if Donald Trump raped and murdered a cheerleader in 2004.
So you didn't really get it, ok.Sure, I don't think anyone would disagree. How does this validate what you posted?
I don't have any problem prosecuting the people who tore shit up in the riot.
I also want the BLM and antifa people who set fire to police stations and courthouses prosecuted.
What downright pisses me off is the double standard applied here. And the fact that liberals are the type of people perfectly fine with law enforcement and government institutions discriminating based off political affiliation. As long as it's directed to people they don't like.
I wouldn't be okay with it if the roles were reversed. So I think it's chicken shit for liberals to be that way.
And exactly what the parties have done going back decades at this point. Likely since Clinton (Mr.)So you didn't really get it, ok.
See, what I'm doing is making an accusation that Donald Trump raped and murdered a cheerleader in 2004, but I'm hiding it behind "just asking questions." It's purely smearing Donald Trump. There's no evidence to my accusation, but I'm implying there might be.
Which is exactly what Gingrich is doing. He's making up shit with no evidence, and getting people like you to defend it on this dumb ass generalization of "well crimes should be punished guys am I right?"
No different now.