We should issue all the kids guns. That way they can defend themselves and won’t have to rely on ineffective adults.
When people make fun of their bang sticks, they get all poopy.
How many more years of trying this exact solution and having the problem still get worse do you want before we try something different?
My stance is the issue should be returned to the state as it was before Roe Vs Wade. Personally I am against abortion for the sake of: Oops I did not intend to get pregnant, however I can work out that even if Roe Vs Wade is overturned, abortion will never be completely banned. Most of us on the pro-life side will ultimately accept common sense restrictions. The battles should be in the states, unless the pro-choice crowd wants to go the constitutional amendment route.
Felons give up some rights when they choose to maim and kill. In those cases, it absolutely can be taken away.
The lame sarcasm board is down the hall. Have a nice evening.
It’s all felons though. And it still isn’t a right if it can be taken away.
Sarcasm board is down the hall.
Why not? I learned proper safety from my dad when I was 8. The constitution didn’t set an age limit. And kids had guns at young ages back then. Hell, they got married in their teens.
The Republicans want a federal ban.
Trash are those who stand on the bodies of little kids to shit on the 2nd amendment.
Let me know when they get to the first day much less year where they try the solution I suggested. No volunteer teachers have been armed yet.
No. I am merely intelligent enough to work out that the bad guys will get guns no matter the laws or gun bans. My motivation is to protect the children. Yours is apparently to protect your "no guns in schools under any circumstances" mantra.
Tell me how you propose we get rid of guns. Only complete morons think passing gun control laws will get rid of them. The UK took away the legal right to possess firearms years ago, yet:
If a former criminal is trusted enough to be out in the public then he or she should have all their rights restored.
Can you show what amendment grants one the right to kill their unborn child. Is it the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th or some other amendment?
Exactly they did their time
You seem a bit confused. The US Constitution does allow the suspension of rights of those who do not obey societies laws. Otherwise, we would not be allowed to put them in jail or prison.
One armed guard is not enough. Does the president only have one armed secret service guard and that guard is placed at the entrence to what ever building the president is in? If one guard is not enough for him then why on earth would one armed guard be enough for a whole entire school building with two hundred or more school kids?
Hogwash.Not having an adequate amount of armed personell and making schools easy targets for suicidal social outcast losers is what denies other their right to live. Making instant celebrities out of suicidal social outcast losers who commit mass murder is what denies other people their right to live.
The republicans would have to go the constitutional amendment route to get such. I don't think either side would be successful along those lines. 38 out of 50 states would have to ratify. It's also why the democrats are highly unlikely to ever get the 2nd amendment repealed.
How so? He said no guns equals no murders. Which is utter nonsense. Are you denying that murders do happen without the use of a gun?
No they wouldn't. They're trying to just pass a bill. No need for a constitutional ammendment. Without roe what would be unconstitutional about it?
Someone should mention to him the rising homicides in the UK with knives. The UK is even enacting "Knife Control" laws.
Either side can pass a bill until the cows come home, however it has no constitutional protection without a constitutional amendment. Don't you ever wonder by the libruls have so much trouble fighting against the second amendment?
