- Joined
- Sep 18, 2011
- Messages
- 78,962
- Reaction score
- 50,769
- Location
- New Mexico
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
Yes GOP. Run with that please.
Yes GOP. Run with that please.
Well it should motivate the lower and middle classes to be born into better families.This isn't the first time I've heard a rightist candidate propose this. It's not enough for them to want to cut taxes for those who can most afford to pay them: They also want to squeeze the lower and middle classes as well.
Its a terribly phrased statement but does have some uncomfortable truths if people are consist in their approach to people paying taxes. When a wealthy person does all they can to exploit tax laws and loopholes to their benefit and reduce their payment it is considered avoiding your fair share of taxes. When someone middle class exploits the tax laws and loopholes to their benefit and reduce their tax burden it’s considered a smart move and good planning. It really depends on how you define paying your fair share and when you shift from smart tax preparation to avoiding paying their fair share.“The top 20% of earners in the United States pay 82% of federal income tax — and, if you do the math, and 45% to 50% don’t pay any income tax, you can see the middle class is not really paying any kind of a fair share, depending on how you want to define it,” Gibbons said.
Yes GOP. Run with that please.
The bottom 50% make 1% of the money. They should pay 1% of the taxes. The top 20% make 90%+ of the money. They aren't paying their fair share.Its a terribly phrased statement but does have some uncomfortable truths if people are consist in their approach to people paying taxes. When a wealthy person does all they can to exploit tax laws and loopholes to their benefit and reduce their payment it is considered avoiding your fair share of taxes. When someone middle class exploits the tax laws and loopholes to their benefit and reduce their tax burden it’s considered a smart move and good planning. It really depends on how you define paying your fair share and when you shift from smart tax preparation to avoiding paying their fair share.
That said, I feel the middle class pays plenty of their share in taxes and Gibbons can take that remark and shove it. Find a better way to try and make your point.
Like the Congressmen said it all depends on how you define Fair Share.The bottom 50% make 1% of the money. They should pay 1% of the taxes. The top 20% make 90%+ of the money. They aren't paying their fair share.
Not really, no.Like the Congressmen said it all depends on how you define Fair Share.
It is even if you want to turn a blind eye to the hypocrisy for the sliding scale of fair share to make senseNot really, no.
Agree.Gibbons said this 7 months ago. Anything is better than Josh Mandel.
That point highlights why it's silly to make statements like Gibbons apparently did.The bottom 50% make 1% of the money. They should pay 1% of the taxes. The top 20% make 90%+ of the money. They aren't paying their fair share.