• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Officer Byrd violated her civil rights

Buster Keaton said:
So, you do not accept that Ashli Babbitt has civil rights against excessive force.
Click to expand...
It was properly utilized force. She did not need to go inside.

Haven't you ever seen "Trespassers will be shot" signs?
 
Stealers Wheel said:
Yeah, he should have waited for the mob to start beating his face in, like the other cops did. THEN he could have shot the hell out of the bunch of them. That's what they teach in the police academy, right?
Click to expand...
sounds like you, and several others here, have done an in-depth study of the rules for use of force.

1744918382260.webp
 
Buster Keaton said:
that is why this should be brought to a trial
Click to expand...
No trial needed in self defense or the protection of others from a mob attack.

You shoot to kill. Just that simple.

Babbit being former military should have known better.
 
Buster Keaton said:
post #1
Click to expand...
Post #1 contains no evidence at all that Byrd used excessive force. It's just generic text talking about when an individual can sue for being a victim of excessive force. Post #1 doesn't even mention Byrd or Babbitt.

So do you have any evidence he used excessive force, or do you just want him to stand trial to determine if he used excessive force?
 
Jagged said:
Post #1 contains no evidence at all that Byrd used excessive force. It's just generic text talking about when an individual can sue for being a victim of excessive force. Post #1 doesn't even mention Byrd or Babbitt.

So do you have any evidence he used excessive force, or do you just want him to stand trial to determine if he used excessive force?
Click to expand...
uuuum shooting her at point blank range is excessive force
 
Buster Keaton said:
u r fighting reality, not me
Click to expand...
Of course I'm not fighting you since you're not presenting any evidence Byrd used excessive force. Lethal force is sometimes justifiable, depending on the circumstances. You saying him shooting her is excessive because he shot her is your opinion, not evidence he used excessive force.

And I'm still waiting for your evidence that the Department of Justice and the Capitol Police Board were running by Democrats.
 
Buster Keaton said:
Byrd used excessive force.
He could have warned her.
He could have pushed her back.
He could have tasered her.
But he chose to shoot her.
Click to expand...

Well, you know what they say. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

You can rehash the same arguments that we saw every day 4 years ago, but it won't change anything. Byrd will never be charged, and Babbitt will stay dead as a doornail.

The world is a better place without her. It's a shame he didn't shoot more of them.
 
Last edited:
Buster Keaton said:
So, you do not accept that Ashli Babbitt has civil rights against excessive force.
Click to expand...

She was using excessive force, was breaking and entering, was threatening people's lives... and she deservedly got shot by somebody acting in self-defense.
 
Buster Keaton said:
uuuum shooting her at point blank range is excessive force
Click to expand...

If anything it shows that the cop waited patiently until he could not wait any longer to deal with the threat that Ashli, the Terrorist, posed.



.
 
Buster Keaton said:
uuuum shooting her at point blank range is excessive force
Click to expand...
How can she be so dumb to continue, having the gun aimed at her? How can she be so dumb as to continue when being told to stop and go back with a gun aimed at her.

She asked for the bullet, and she was given what she asked for.
 
Buster Keaton said:
Michael Byrd should be charged with violating the civil rights of Ashli Babbitt.

4th Amendment Rights

Civil Rights Act Section 1983 & Excessive Force by Police

NOTE: This blog article was amended to reflect recent changes to U.S. federal law with passage of the First Step Act (P.L. 115- 391). Since December 21, 2018, the First Step Act required numerous changes to the federal criminal justice […]
www.federalcriminallawyer.us www.federalcriminallawyer.us
The Civil Rights Act of 1871, which is codified as 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 and commonly known as “Section 1983,” prohibits any person from violating constitutional rights while acting “under the color of law.” In other words, it is unlawful for someone acting in an official governmental capacity to deprive another person of their constitutional rights.
Excessive force is a type of police misconduct where the officer’s actions go beyond the bounds of force that a reasonable officer would use under the same circumstances. These cases focus on the objective reasonableness of the force used – not whether the arrestee was injured. Whether the officer’s use of force was excessive depends largely on the circumstances and facts of each specific case. A judge or jury will weigh the available evidence and applicable laws to determine whether or not the police officer applied a reasonable amount of force.
Click to expand...
He should be charged with murder because that was what it was. He should also be charged for attempting to cover it up because that's what he did.
 
trouble13 said:
He should be charged with murder because that was what it was. He should also be charged for attempting to cover it up because that's what he did.
Click to expand...

🤣

I understand that you feel strongly about this. But no one cares about your feelings, and Byrd will never be charged.

Please, feel free to keep crying about it for another 4 years.
 
So we’ve got yet another rehash thread of the Ashli Babbitt shooting that was started and perpetuated by two people who just joined this site yesterday? How shocking…

The moment the barricades delineating the restricted area around the Capitol building on January 6, 2021 were breached, guess what? Those people were in violation of the law. Period. There were signs at that point that told them so.

The Capitol was closed, and the fact the mob broke their way into the building itself, then tried to break down doors inside of the Capitol, should have been a warning to reasonable people that there may be a swift, violent retaliation against them at any time.

Guess when you’ve got a small mob with you trying to break down internal doors and glass to gain entry into a part of the Capitol that’s also clearly barricaded, complete with officers with handguns drawn on you, you somehow get the courage to defy common sense and try to jump through the broken window pane because you’ve got, you know, civil rights?

What kind of ****ing backwards nonsense is this?
 
Lord of Planar said:
How can she be so dumb to continue, having the gun aimed at her? How can she be so dumb as to continue when being told to stop and go back with a gun aimed at her.

She asked for the bullet, and she was given what she asked for.
Click to expand...
There's no evidence she knew there was a gun aimed at her.
 
trouble13 said:
He should be charged with murder because that was what it was. He should also be charged for attempting to cover it up because that's what he did.
Click to expand...
This issue is showing that the crazy left wingers do not have any real principles, all that have is anger, ignorance and hate.
They are actually opposing her 4th amendment civil rights.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom