- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
- Messages
- 133,631
- Reaction score
- 30,937
- Location
- Bagdad, La.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
I listened to video of the booing, and it sounded like about three people. Obviously the rest of the crowd had proper respect for the guy.
But like Herman Cain said, it was enough so that someone should have spoken up. But he said that the day after.
Audience Members At Fox News Debate Boo Gay Soldier (VIDEO) | Election 2012
Apparently some of their more vocal supporters do.
ohhhhhhhhhhh, so it's just about gay soldiers? Not all of our soldiers, just the gay ones.
Hey dude, I get it!
You're all over the place, aren't you?
Reread the thread title and maybe you'll get it.
Yeah, two dudes booed. That's huge.
While we're on the subject, let's talk about it's not the president's place to tell the American people what they can and can't say in public. Kinda goes against the whole free speech craziness that Libbos hate, except when it's them doing the speaking, that is.
That's rich, the liberals believe the behavior of a handle full of people represents the collective thinking of 120,000,000 people. I guess it's fair game to assume the murderous rantings of the New Black Panther Party MUST represent the collective thinking of the entire democrat party.
Watch it, it's not as climactic as it's been made out to be.
We should, yes, but the president shouldn't. How many times has Obama set WBC and Code Pink straight? Did Obama say anything when Jack Murtha falsely accused four Marines of murder?
I've never seen Obama set anyone straight, when they hoisted the most shameful of accusations and insults on our troops. But now, a couple cats boo a gay soldier and it's all of a sudden the president's job to say something about it?
How should we define this?
1) Political correctness run amuck?
2) Obama exploiting our troops to score political points?
3) Obama is just stupid?
4) Obama is so desperate to score some kind of political victory, that he's latching on to anything he can?
What should we call it?
Yeah, where were they when Libbos were calling our troops murderers and war criminals?
The only reason this is a story, is because this soldier is gay.
I am a libbo and you know I have not done so. That proves you are overgeneralizing.
Where was Obama for the past nine years when Libbos were insulting our troops?
Bet you won't answer that one.
Where they doing it at events he was at?
That makes a difference? Really?
Give us some more disqualifiers to protect the hypocritical Libbos.
Hell, not only did it happen at an event he was at...he was the one saying it!
Obama: troops just airraiding villages and killing civilians - YouTube
I'm sure most of the right doesn't know. Fox is famous for taking sound bites out of context and then telling them what to believe about the altered message. It would be hilarious if it wasn't so tragic.Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
Hell, not only did it happen at an event he was at...he was the one saying it!
Obama: troops just airraiding villages and killing civilians - YouTubeYou have no ****ing clue what he was talking about there do you?
I'm sure most of the right doesn't know. Fox is famous for taking sound bites out of context and then telling them what to believe about the altered message. It would be hilarious if it wasn't so tragic.
it was Log cabin Republicans who filed the suit agasint DADT ...that ended in a decision of DADT being unconstitutional.
at the time is was passed, Democrat Sam Nunn led the opposition for keeping the total ban on homosexuals.. and Republican Barry Goldwater led the charge for full repeal... Clinton compromised with DADT.
what was that about historical revision again?
You have no ****ing clue what he was talking about there do you?
Anecdotal. Clearly conservatives are, in general, more strongly opposed to various rights of homosexuals, including the right to serve openly.
Of course he could have addressed them in his response which he failed to do because they were both about the same subject, the booing and question that is, however its hardly a point to criticize him about
Actually it is quite easy, he does not support homosexuality and he even says after that he would reinstate the DADT. (If I remember correctly) Maybe I should just start referring people that talk about Santorum to the google search.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?