Why would you say it was due to gain of function. Please explain how it would be due to gain of function.
Gain of function research was in fact going on at the time of the outbreak. if it was a lab leak, I suspect you can work it out.
I did not say it was his fault. I only pointed out that he is Complicite.
I absolutely do. I just cited it.
Bs. That’s complete bs.
Sure you are. We’ve established that already.
See above.
Yes it is about science. Intelligence agencies most CERTAINLY have agendas . Certainly an intelligence service will lie to make another nation look bad and frankly it’s understandable.
Completely rational.
Awesome. Explain exactly what gain of function was occuring and how it would cause covid.
Great. Explain how he would be complicit.
That is a very immature take on the vaccine issue. Which part of I have taken six Covid vaccine jabs did you not understand? I also take the flu shot every year, had the RSV vaccine early this year, I have taken both Shingrix shots, and all three Pneumonia vaccines. If you are truly in the medical field, then I sincerely want to believe that you are intellectual enough to work out that I am not an anti-vaxxer. Anti-mandate does not equate to antivaxx. You really need to stop thinking in authoritarian terms. Mandates are not necessary to gain enough compliance for herd immunity.
TDS projection.
I already have.
When you repeat anti vaxxers nonsense and spread disinformation that kills people . You reap what you sow there anti vaxxer.
Propagating the anti vaxxers lies as you do is what prevents us from reaching herd immunity.
No silly , it has nothing to do with trump.
No you didn’t , nor did you explain exactly what gain of function research is , what type of gain of function was going on in wuhan and how fauci would be implicit in a lab leak.
I am beginning to doubt that you are in the medical profession. Anyone that smart should be able to work out that you can be pro-vaccine and anti-mandate at the same time. You are far too much into an authoritarian mindset.
Look who is talking. You still have not admitted that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris were the first public anti-vaxxers.
Calm down your TDS.
www.newsweek.com
What I thought. People not understanding gain of function asserting gain of function research was being done through nih grants.Fauci 'Untruthful' to Congress About Wuhan Lab Research, Documents Suggest
Newly released grant proposals indicate the National Institutes of Health funded controversial gain of function research—appearing to contradict what Dr. Anthony Fauci told Congress earlier this year.
NIH Admits to Funding Gain-of-Function Research in Wuhan, Says EcoHealth Violated Reporting Requirements
A top NIH official admitted that U.S. taxpayers funded gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses in Wuhan.www.yahoo.com
That you now admitting that gain of function research was occurring in the Wuhan lab is enough. Your attempts to play professor and quiz me on the particulars is not going to rescue you from the probability of a lab leak causing the pandemic.
Actual no. See you don’t know what gain of function research is. Most people don’t. So it’s quite easy for them to say “ gain of function “ on research that is not gain of function .
Projection from the same librul who lacks the intellectual ability to distinguish between anti-mandate and anti-vaxx
That in fact did occur. Many who died with covid rather than of covid were counted as covid deaths. I don't think the death certificates were modified.
Great. Explain in your own words what gain of function is and give some examples. You’ve been asked what ? Three times and haven’t answered.
Most who died from Covid had many contributing comorbidities. Why single out one if it was not the direct cause? My own mother died the final time she contracted the flu. Most can shake off the flu. However, she had a serious comorbidity, known as COPD, without which she could have survived that bout with the flu. The cause listed on her death certificate was COPD, not the flu.
Yep. Those first two variants were very deadly. What's your point?
Well you aren’t “ singling out one” if it’s not the cause.
COPD was the immediate cause of death.
The point is that she already had chronic COPD. She was merely unlucky enough to get contract the flue while having COPD one too many times. She had fought it off several times before. She did not die because she had the flu, most people shake it off. She died of COPD. A common cold would have been just about as dangerous to her. That's why her pulmonologist listed the cause of death as COPD. Flu was just a complication.
And that’s right COPD was listed as her cause of death per your report.
I not only saw the report. I signed it and still have certified copies of it. It solely listed COPD as the cause of death.
He was her pulmonologist for one year short of two decades. I would say he knew here well.
It was not mild COPD, she had previous close calls, Sure, influenza was a contributing factor, or complication, however the cause was COPD. Think of it in similar terms to someone dying of lung cancer. The primary cause of death is usually listed as lung cancer even though pneumonia was the final event. If her doctor would have listed her cause in any other fashion, it would have been complications of COPD.
Yes . Everything I said.