Nowadays the left's institutional racism against whites is common

[Phys251]

On a scale of 1 to 10, how delusional do you have to be to think minorities are oppressing white people?

11.

 

[Ouroboros]

NY Post is a tabloid. Find an example of discrimination against whites because of DEI policies in a legitimate source and I’ll read it and reply.

Ooh, I didn't expect the "testimony is worthless unless it's touted by the lying legacy media." I looked around to see if I could find legacy media sources seeking to discredit Lee, but their response has been the same as yours: the River of Denial.

 

[Loulit01]

Ooh, I didn't expect the "testimony is worthless unless it's touted by the lying legacy media." I looked around to see if I could find legacy media sources seeking to discredit Lee, but their response has been the same as yours: the River of Denial.

Oh, I so agree! The legacy media cannot be believed! I mean, The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Associated Press, all fake, Fake, FAKE NEWS! Are you kidding me? Get real!

The NY Post is honest journalism at its finest. Last year, The Post won the MAGA Mega Minions Award as the most trustworthy news source for people with an IQ higher than that of a fruit bat. Oh, and the year before, it snagged the Donald "Wedgefoot" Trump trophy for winning the most literary championships in contests it didn't enter!

The Post is the greatest, many people are saying. And I know journalism. I know journalism better than anybody.

 

[Ouroboros]

Oh, I so agree! The legacy media cannot be believed! I mean, The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Associated Press, all fake, Fake, FAKE NEWS! Are you kidding me? Get real!

The NY Post is honest journalism at its finest. Last year, The Post won the MAGA Mega Minions Award as the most trustworthy news source for people with an IQ higher than that of a fruit bat. Oh, and the year before, it snagged the Donald "Wedgefoot" Trump trophy for winning the most literary championships in contests it didn't enter!

The Post is the greatest, many people are saying. And I know journalism. I know journalism better than anybody.

Does any of this blather in any way show that the NYP falsified the testimony of Tabia Lee? Since she wrote the essay herself, there doesn't seem to be any way that NYP misrepresented her testimony. So you're making the assumption that nothing she said she experienced can be veracious because it appeared in NYP. And that's just a cop-out to defend the racists in academia.

 

[Loulit01]

Does any of this blather in any way show that the NYP falsified the testimony of Tabia Lee? Since she wrote the essay herself, there doesn't seem to be any way that NYP misrepresented her testimony. So you're making the assumption that nothing she said she experienced can be veracious because it appeared in NYP. And that's just a cop-out to defend the racists in academia.

Academia has racists. MAGA doesn't.

 

[lynnwinslow]

Ooh, I didn't expect the "testimony is worthless unless it's touted by the lying legacy media."

Don’t put quotes around something I didn’t say. It’s dishonest.

I looked around to see if I could find legacy media sources seeking to discredit Lee, but their response has been the same as yours: the River of Denial.

If your story is true that would be an example of one incident. Why should the Trump administration do away with all Federal DEI policies and attack other entities for their DEI policies because of one incident?

 

[bythoughts]

There are people I trust more than RFK. For example: any liberal, any independent, Russell Brand, any member of the Chinese Communist Party, Donald Trump, that ugly lady on the tabloids they call a 'Living Nostradamus', and Ŧucker Carlson. If I had to name the list of people I trust less, then I'd have to think awhile.

 

[Ouroboros]

Academia has racists. MAGA doesn't.

Good, you're thinking outside the Mad Lib narrative. I suspect it won't last though.

 

[Ouroboros]

Don’t put quotes around something I didn’t say. It’s dishonest.

Thanks for another exhibition of drivel.

If your story is true that would be an example of one incident. Why should the Trump administration do away with all Federal DEI policies and attack other entities for their DEI policies because of one incident?

I didn't say it was the only incident. I wanted to see if anyone would make an honest response to the incident. So far, nothing.

 

[lynnwinslow]

Thanks for another exhibition of drivel.

It's odd that you would think a grammar correction is drivel but you do you.

I didn't say it was the only incident. I wanted to see if anyone would make an honest response to the incident. So far, nothing.

And I wanted to see if anyone could provide a link from a valid source, Reuters, BBC, AP, court documents ... Tick tock.

 

[Deuce]

Every day of their lives, right wingers have to think of themselves as the victims of something. Otherwise they risk having to reflect on how awful they've become.

 

[The Brad Dad]

Does any of this blather in any way show that the NYP falsified the testimony of Tabia Lee? Since she wrote the essay herself, there doesn't seem to be any way that NYP misrepresented her testimony. So you're making the assumption that nothing she said she experienced can be veracious because it appeared in NYP. And that's just a cop-out to defend the racists in academia.

Testimony of one person is called anecdotal.

 

[Ouroboros]

Testimony of one person is called anecdotal.

You just dismissed the entire case of E Jean Carroll, who never had anything but an anecdote (and a preposterous one, unlike Lee's), which a partisan jury chose to believe to indulge their TDS.

 

[j brown's body]

Imagine what it would be like if we didn't engage in merit based hiring for cabinet level positions...

Is this sarcasm?

 

[Ouroboros]

It's odd that you would think a grammar correction is drivel but you do you.

Quote marks do not always connote a quote of a particular person's words. That's why it became a thing, and may still be, in which people would mime "quote marks" in the air when they were speaking of something they did not take seriously. That's the context to which I reduced your lame argument.

And I wanted to see if anyone could provide a link from a valid source, Reuters, BBC, AP, court documents ... Tick tock.

Your entirely random dismissal of a legitimate complaint is noted. The MSM has been known for ignoring many stories that were proven factual. Or do you still choose to believe that the Hunter Laptop was Russian disinformation?

 

[Ouroboros]

Every day of their lives, right wingers have to think of themselves as the victims of something. Otherwise they risk having to reflect on how awful they've become.

It's not right wingers complaining of being traumatized by jeans ads.

 

[j brown's body]

Thankfully, President Trump is trying to root out the left's commitment to institutional racism.

Race-based hiring allegations lead RFK to pull millions from Duke under Trump DEI order

Federal officials freeze Duke Health's $108 million grant funding over concerns that its diversity, equity and inclusion programs may violate anti-discrimination laws.

www.foxnews.com

This money should be allocated based on the merits of the program, not based on political considerations.

RFK is endangering our health and the institutions that work to protect it by playing this game.

 

[DCCougar]

....the left's commitment to institutional racism.....

It's called anti-racism. Racist MAGAs are up in arms about it! They want their racism, to discriminate against anyone who isn't white!

 

[Rogue Valley]

Donald Trump - sued by the Federal government in 1973 for housing discrimination in Manhattan and the Bronx - obviously has a problem with Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI)

In short, Trump is a bigot. He defended racists at the “Unite the Right” white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Va.

The Trump Family's History of Housing Discrimination

In the 1970s, the Department of Justice investigated and later sued Trump Management for discriminating against black people applying to be tenants in Trump properties.

www.newsweek.com

Trump Defends White-Nationalist Protesters: 'Some Very Fine People on Both Sides'

The president backtracked from his remarks on Charlottesville just a day earlier.

www.theatlantic.com

 

[Lycanthrope]

The MAGA subcult of straight white Christian male victimhood rolls on.

 

[lynnwinslow]

Quote marks do not always connote a quote of a particular person's words. That's why it became a thing, and may still be, in which people would mime "quote marks" in the air when they were speaking of something they did not take seriously. That's the context to which I reduced your lame argument.

Well, if you want to test the forum rules boundaries, you do you.

Your entirely random dismissal of a legitimate complaint is noted. The MSM has been known for ignoring many stories that were proven factual. Or do you still choose to believe that the Hunter Laptop was Russian disinformation?

It's not a dismissal. I asked for confirmation of an DEI discrimination complaint that wasn't sourced from a tabloid. It doesn't even have to be about the same person, it could be anyone.
If DEI discrimination is such a big problem, don't you think the complaints would be easy to find? A civil court case, Reuters report, AP, BBC, etc.

 

[The Brad Dad]

You just dismissed the entire case of E Jean Carroll

No I didn't. You don't seem to understand what "anecdotal" means. Do better.

 

[Ouroboros]

Well, if you want to test the forum rules boundaries, you do you.

Show me the rule that specifies that all uses of quotation marks connote quotes of other posters. You can't do it, but your desperation to protect your lame argument speaks for itself.

It's not a dismissal. I asked for confirmation of an DEI discrimination complaint that wasn't sourced from a tabloid. It doesn't even have to be about the same person, it could be anyone.
If DEI discrimination is such a big problem, don't you think the complaints would be easy to find? A civil court case, Reuters report, AP, BBC, etc.

If you cared about the effects of DEI discrimination you would have already seen numerous stories about antisemitism on American campuses. Here's one from Reuters for you to find some flimsy excuse to dismiss, as you did the Lee testimony on the basis of nothing but your personal prejudices.

Harvard settles lawsuits over antisemitism on campus

Harvard University will provide additional protections for Jewish students under a settlement announced on Tuesday that resolves two lawsuits accusing the Ivy League school of becoming a hotbed of rampant antisemitism.

www.reuters.com

So what prompted Harvard to course-correct? I know it's the same commitment to partisan diversity reported by Tabia Lee, but since Reuters didn't offer any conclusion at all for you to parrot, let's hear why you *think* Harvard settled.

 

[Ouroboros]

No I didn't. You don't seem to understand what "anecdotal" means. Do better.

I know that when Mad Libs use any word, it's in the service of their one-sided, hypocritical agendas.

 

[The Brad Dad]

So what prompted Harvard to course-correct? I know it's the same commitment to partisan diversity reported by Tabia Lee, but since Reuters didn't offer any conclusion at all for you to parrot, let's hear why you *think* Harvard settled.

Because they're craven in a time of an authoritarian child rapist in the white house. Same child rapist that called all American Jews "shylocks" a few weeks ago because he's such a champion of God's Chosen. (BTW this was a proper use of quotation marks as I'm directly quoting Trump.)