Nowadays the left's institutional racism against whites is common

[The Brad Dad]

I know that when Mad Libs use any word, it's in the service of their one-sided, hypocritical agendas.

I wish that maga would understand the meaning of any of the words they use.

 

[lynnwinslow]

Show me the rule that specifies that all uses of quotation marks connote quotes of other posters. You can't do it, but your desperation to protect your lame argument speaks for itself.

I do know that deliberately misquoting a comment with the intent to jeer or score points and not acknowledging that it isn't what the poster actually said is against the rules.
If you don't believe me, try it.

If you cared about the effects of DEI discrimination you would have already seen numerous stories about antisemitism on American campuses. Here's one from Reuters for you to find some flimsy excuse to dismiss, as you did the Lee testimony on the basis of nothing but your personal prejudices.

Harvard settles lawsuits over antisemitism on campus

Harvard University will provide additional protections for Jewish students under a settlement announced on Tuesday that resolves two lawsuits accusing the Ivy League school of becoming a hotbed of rampant antisemitism.

www.reuters.com

So what prompted Harvard to course-correct? I know it's the same commitment to partisan diversity reported by Tabia Lee, but since Reuters didn't offer any conclusion at all for you to parrot, let's hear why you *think* Harvard settled.

Well, now we are on to actual discussion rather than deflection and insults. Awesome.

The settlement does not imply that Harvard discriminated because of its DEI policies.
Harvard was found to have inadequately enforced existing nondiscrimination policies. Not that it used DEI policies to discriminate.

 

[ALiberalModerate]

Is this sarcasm?

Obviously

 

[Maidenrules29]

Lame.
Harris has a law degree, she was the San Francisco DA for 7 years, CA AG for 7 years, a US Senator for 4 years and a VP for 4 years.

You can be all those things and still be an idiot. Have you ever heard her talk?

 

[Ouroboros]

Donald Trump - sued by the Federal government in 1973 for housing discrimination in Manhattan and the Bronx - obviously has a problem with Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI)

In short, Trump is a bigot. He defended racists at the “Unite the Right” white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Va.

The Trump Family's History of Housing Discrimination

In the 1970s, the Department of Justice investigated and later sued Trump Management for discriminating against black people applying to be tenants in Trump properties.

www.newsweek.com

Trump Defends White-Nationalist Protesters: 'Some Very Fine People on Both Sides'

The president backtracked from his remarks on Charlottesville just a day earlier.

www.theatlantic.com

Thanks, I knew a lot of TV pundits managed to move forward the Charlottesville Hoax with the mealy-mouthed, "Some people think Trump sided with the white nationalists," but now that I've seen even the smidgen available before you hit the paywall, I know the Atlantic is one of the dirty rags that seriously tried to sell the BS. I had no opinion of it before, now I know it's trash.

Since you must not have read anything about the matter since 2017, here's an update for you.

No, Trump Did Not Call Neo-Nazis and White Supremacists 'Very Fine People'

However, the accuracy of what Trump did claim – that there were "very fine people on both sides" of the 2017 Unite the Right debacle – is in question.

www.snopes.com

 

[Ouroboros]

Oh, I so agree! The legacy media cannot be believed! I mean, The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Associated Press, all fake, Fake, FAKE NEWS! Are you kidding me? Get real!

The NY Post is honest journalism at its finest. Last year, The Post won the MAGA Mega Minions Award as the most trustworthy news source for people with an IQ higher than that of a fruit bat. Oh, and the year before, it snagged the Donald "Wedgefoot" Trump trophy for winning the most literary championships in contests it didn't enter!

The Post is the greatest, many people are saying. And I know journalism. I know journalism better than anybody.

See post 105.

 

[Ouroboros]

Because they're craven in a time of an authoritarian child rapist in the white house. Same child rapist that called all American Jews "shylocks" a few weeks ago because he's such a champion of God's Chosen. (BTW this was a proper use of quotation marks as I'm directly quoting Trump.)

Thank you, that fake excuse for Harvard is one of the best demonstrations of TDS I've seen this week! That's what keeps me coming back here.

 

[Ouroboros]

I wish that maga would understand the meaning of any of the words they use.

Copycats never prosper.

 

[Ouroboros]

I do know that deliberately misquoting a comment with the intent to jeer or score points and not acknowledging that it isn't what the poster actually said is against the rules.
If you don't believe me, try it.

That's funny, your earlier post stated categorically that I'd already "tried it." Now the preceding was a quote, albeit with a tense alteration, but it's not a sarcasm-quote. Are you ever going to admit that you are familiar with the practice of using sarcasm-quotes, or is your silence on that matter an admission of unfamiliarity with the practice?

Well, now we are on to actual discussion rather than deflection and insults. Awesome.

The settlement does not imply that Harvard discriminated because of its DEI policies.
Harvard was found to have inadequately enforced existing nondiscrimination policies. Not that it used DEI policies to discriminate.

It certainly would be nice if you could lose your deflection about imaginary rule violations.

So the logical follow-up to your rationale is: why did Harvard inadequately enforce the policies in question? Reuters, one of the media sources you claim to find credible, didn't address the subject of Harvard's motives for allowing anti-Jewish rhetoric. Who benefited from Harvard's reticence, if not the DEI fanatics, whose true idea of "diversity" is whatever culture they deem "marginalized?" (See, that's another sarcasm-quote, which should be evident from the fact that you didn't use the word. It's not a response to you but to Mad Libs generally, just like the previous sarcasm-quote.)

 

[The Brad Dad]

Thank you, that fake excuse for Harvard is one of the best demonstrations of TDS I've seen this week! That's what keeps me coming back here.

I thought it was the ongoing humiliation

 

[Ouroboros]

I thought it was the ongoing humiliation

Well, the fact that your TDS places you in a humiliating situation is kind of a given.

 

[lynnwinslow]

Show me the rule that specifies that all uses of quotation marks connote quotes of other posters. You can't do it, but your desperation to protect your lame argument speaks for itself.

If you cared about the effects of DEI discrimination you would have already seen numerous stories about antisemitism on American campuses. Here's one from Reuters for you to find some flimsy excuse to dismiss, as you did the Lee testimony on the basis of nothing but your personal prejudices.

Harvard settles lawsuits over antisemitism on campus

Harvard University will provide additional protections for Jewish students under a settlement announced on Tuesday that resolves two lawsuits accusing the Ivy League school of becoming a hotbed of rampant antisemitism.

www.reuters.com

So what prompted Harvard to course-correct? I know it's the same commitment to partisan diversity reported by Tabia Lee, but since Reuters didn't offer any conclusion at all for you to parrot, let's hear why you *think* Harvard settled.

If you couldn't reply with obfuscation, hyperbole and ad homs, you'd have nothing to say. I'm done here. It's not surrender, it's boredom.

 

[Rogue Valley]

Thanks, I knew a lot of TV pundits managed to move forward the Charlottesville Hoax with the mealy-mouthed, "Some people think Trump sided with the white nationalists," but now that I've seen even the smidgen available before you hit the paywall, I know the Atlantic is one of the dirty rags that seriously tried to sell the BS. I had no opinion of it before, now I know it's trash.

To MAGA stalwarts such as yourself, everyone that criticises your precious Trump is trash. That even applies to raw statistics....

Trump fires labor statistics boss hours after the release of weak jobs report

Without evidence, Trump called the data "rigged" and implied that BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer manipulated the numbers "for political purposes."

www.nbcnews.com

Since you must not have read anything about the matter since 2017, here's an update for you.

Worse than that, your boy Trump is now protecting a child-trafficker and pedophile.....

Sex Trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell Moved to Minimum Security Prison

Ghislaine Maxwell, the accomplice of Jeffrey Epstein, has been moved from a federal prison in Florida to a minimum security prison in Texas.

time.com

 

[devildavid]

What's that? You're requesting an encore? One More Time!

You have to live with the Kamala!
Stuck in the weeds with the Kamala!
Listening to cackling Kamala!
Not a problem with the Donald-a!

You have provided zero evidence that DEI policies are discriminatory and have led to discriminatory actions.

 

[devildavid]

That's funny, your earlier post stated categorically that I'd already "tried it." Now the preceding was a quote, albeit with a tense alteration, but it's not a sarcasm-quote. Are you ever going to admit that you are familiar with the practice of using sarcasm-quotes, or is your silence on that matter an admission of unfamiliarity with the practice?

It certainly would be nice if you could lose your deflection about imaginary rule violations.

So the logical follow-up to your rationale is: why did Harvard inadequately enforce the policies in question? Reuters, one of the media sources you claim to find credible, didn't address the subject of Harvard's motives for allowing anti-Jewish rhetoric. Who benefited from Harvard's reticence, if not the DEI fanatics, whose true idea of "diversity" is whatever culture they deem "marginalized?" (See, that's another sarcasm-quote, which should be evident from the fact that you didn't use the word. It's not a response to you but to Mad Libs generally, just like the previous sarcasm-quote.)

There are no such thing as DEI fanatics. DEI policies are not used to favor any groups considered marginalized at the moment. That is your accusation which is not supported by reality. Harvard did not allow anti Jewish rhetoric under any DEI policies. There is no evidence of this at all.

 

[Ouroboros]

To MAGA stalwarts such as yourself, everyone that criticises your precious Trump is trash. That even applies to raw statistics....

Trump fires labor statistics boss hours after the release of weak jobs report

Without evidence, Trump called the data "rigged" and implied that BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer manipulated the numbers "for political purposes."

www.nbcnews.com

Worse than that, your boy Trump is now protecting a child-trafficker and pedophile.....

Sex Trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell Moved to Minimum Security Prison

Ghislaine Maxwell, the accomplice of Jeffrey Epstein, has been moved from a federal prison in Florida to a minimum security prison in Texas.

time.com

Yes, changing the subject always works to make your position weaker. Thanks for the demonstration.

 

[Ouroboros]

You have provided zero evidence that DEI policies are discriminatory and have led to discriminatory actions.

Why talk to the wall when I can sing?

You have to live with the Kamala!
Stuck in the weeds with the Kamala!
Listening to cackling Kamala!
Not a problem with the Donald-a!

 

[Ouroboros]

There are no such thing as DEI fanatics. DEI policies are not used to favor any groups considered marginalized at the moment. That is your accusation which is not supported by reality. Harvard did not allow anti Jewish rhetoric under any DEI policies. There is no evidence of this at all.

Sorry, I still don't have to feed your ego because you try to build on remarks I made to other posters. You suffer from the misapprehension that your argument is stronger if you just keep repeating your dogma. See, I'm willing to engage with posters like the one to whom I responded, particularly if I've not talked to them before, because their dogma may prove funny. But I know from past experience that your dogma isn't funny, just boring. You will now proceed to repeat your dogma again and continue to prove yourself boring.

Here's a possible counter to the tedium: after you finish repeating yourself, do you want to clarify why you added the phrase "at the moment?" The entire history of DEI is wrapped up in the rationale that certain groups have ALWAYS been marginalized, and that's why DEI is necessary in the first place.

 

[Ouroboros]

If you couldn't reply with obfuscation, hyperbole and ad homs, you'd have nothing to say. I'm done here. It's not surrender, it's boredom.

Thank you for acknowledging that you were boring me, but hey, there are greater bores here, and I've learned to live with them for the sake of the occasional moments of humor.

 

[Rogue Valley]

Yes, changing the subject always works to make your position weaker. Thanks for the demonstration.

No one gaslights at DP more than MAGA. None are more racist than MAGA. Trump and MAGA are waging war against Diveristy, Equity, and Inclusiveness (DEI).

Your Hero - DonOld Trump - was sued by the Federal government for racial housing discrimination....

United States v. Fred C. Trump, Donald Trump, and Trump Management, Inc. 1:73-01529 (E.D.N.Y.) | Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse

index,follow

clearinghouse.net

 

[devildavid]

Why talk to the wall when I can sing?

You have to live with the Kamala!
Stuck in the weeds with the Kamala!
Listening to cackling Kamala!
Not a problem with the Donald-a!

No evidence presented as usual.

 

[devildavid]

Sorry, I still don't have to feed your ego because you try to build on remarks I made to other posters. You suffer from the misapprehension that your argument is stronger if you just keep repeating your dogma. See, I'm willing to engage with posters like the one to whom I responded, particularly if I've not talked to them before, because their dogma may prove funny. But I know from past experience that your dogma isn't funny, just boring. You will now proceed to repeat your dogma again and continue to prove yourself boring.

Here's a possible counter to the tedium: after you finish repeating yourself, do you want to clarify why you added the phrase "at the moment?" The entire history of DEI is wrapped up in the rationale that certain groups have ALWAYS been marginalized, and that's why DEI is necessary in the first place.

I have an argument. You have nothing but accusations without evidence. And a straw man version of what DEI is.

 

[Ouroboros]

No one gaslights at DP more than MAGA. None are more racist than MAGA. Trump and MAGA are waging war against Diveristy, Equity, and Inclusiveness (DEI).

Your Hero - DonOld Trump - was sued by the Federal government for racial housing discrimination....

United States v. Fred C. Trump, Donald Trump, and Trump Management, Inc. 1:73-01529 (E.D.N.Y.) | Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse

index,follow

clearinghouse.net

And the Trump lawyers in that period did not admit wrongdoing, any more than CBS News admitted wrongdoing when they settled Trump's lawsuit against them. But I'm sure you'll have some clever way to explain why settling indicates wrongdoing when it's Trump but not when it's your side.

 

[Ouroboros]

No evidence presented as usual.

I see a wall, and it has the same message written on it, over and over and over. Why should anyone talk to a wall?

 

[devildavid]

I see a wall, and it has the same message written on it, over and over and over. Why should anyone talk to a wall?

I see unsubstantiated opinions stated over and over. Still no evidence.