Peaceful Muslim said:
What i wanted to clarify, if someone is using this method under the name of serving Islam of course they are mistaken tell me something, what good came out of 9/11 if the so called muslim did it for the sake of muslims?? this is why i said those organizations relate in noway to true Islam concepts in War
I know you will relate the same to Hamas actions.. remember when i told you when "if i came to the US and bombed you then call me a terrorist" Hamas at least are resisting in an actual war .If Hamas went to the US and bombed a building there, everybody will condemn that action..
On September 11, 2001, before the dust settled, I did not know for sure that it was a Muslim, all I saw was the method they were using. But, due to conversations fresh in my mind with a Muslim supporter of the Taliban I had some likely suspects:
“It just looks to me like chastisement, and death for nonbelievers here on earth is what is being advocated. If I am interpreting this correctly, that’s not nice. These could easy be misinterpreted, if that is what I am doing but I really don’t think so, to justify terrorist fanatics.” (Posted August 30, 2001 at 10:35 PM) {typo corrected}
On August 31, 2001 at 11:22 PM, the Muslim said, “i will write more tomorrow when i have a better chance to read your post in it's entirity. muslim.” That was the final communication. On September 01, 2001, at 12:03 AM, in response to that final communication I said: “Don’t worry about people turning around a point, if a point is true that’s all we have to worry about, anyway most people on here just run when a good argument catches them. If I find a good argument I will use it; truth neither of us have to fear.”
On September 11, 2001, I did not know that Al Quacka would first deny responsibility.
On September 11, 2001, I did not know that on October 29, 2001, many “liberals“ in this country would still be claiming that we did not have proof of who did it or that the day after I would be downloading this letter from Saddam‘s website:
“On the basis of what we said about Iraq while confronting aggressions, the world now needs to abort the US aggressive schemes, including its aggression on the Afghan people, which must stop.
Again we say that when someone feels that he is unjustly treated, and no one is repulsing or stopping the injustice inflicted on him, he personally seeks ways and means for lifting that justice. Of course, not everyone is capable of finding the best way for lifting the injustice inflicted on him. People resort to what they think is the best way according to their own ideas, and they are not all capable of reaching out for what is beyond what is available to arrive to the best idea or means.
To find the best way, after having found their way to God and His rights, those who are inflicted by injustice need not to be isolated from their natural milieu, or be ignored deliberately, or as a result of mis-appreciation, by the officials in this milieu. They should, rather, be reassured and helped to save themselves, and their surroundings. It is only normal to say that punishment is a necessity in our world, because what is a necessity in the other world must also be necessary in our world on Earth. But, the punishment in the other world is faire and just, and the prophets and messengers of God (peace be upon them all) conducted punishment and called for it in justice, and not on the basis of suspicions and whims.” (Saddam Hussein Shabban 13, 1422 H. October 29, 2001.)
All I knew for sure on September 11, 2001, was that who ever did it was vaporized, and that they must have used civilian disguise to get on the planes.
So I guess in anticipation of all of it on September 11, 2001, at 10:59:42 AM, before the dust settled, I said “Responsibility! Who cares? Death all terrorist shall share.”
===============
Since I remember August 2001, and those conversations with the Muslim supporter of the Taliban, and the verses of the Koran that caused me to have likely suspects for September 11, 2001, before I knew who dressed in civilian clothes on September 11, 2001, to get on the planes. Therefore, I have no choice but to repeat my argument and ask for an unequivocal answer:
Since “Muslims are against hurting civilians in any way,“ and since you “believe that 9/11 served the people who want Islam to look bad and justify the war against it,“ and since the 9/11 attackers wore civilian disguise, consequently, the use of civilian disguise in warfare serves the people who want civilians “to look bad and justify the war against it,” therefore, those people that use civilian disguise in warfare are the enemies of Islam.
Peaceful Muslim, in your opinion, is that a valid argument?