Just search for Reagan’s record on civil rights. He appeared right after his nomination in what the same county where those youth were murdered. He champions states rights. The message was pretty clear to me. What do you think it meant?
His administration then slow walked civil rights enforcement. And I didn’t even mention his talk of a “strapping young buck” on food stamps or welfare queens.
See, the way you felt a need to throw a bunch of weak accusations in with your slight noting of your original claim?
That is called a Gish Gallop Logical Fallacy. It is used when you don't have a good argument, so you throw a bunch of shit at your opponent in the hopes that the oppoent won't be able to address them all, perhaps because of other demands on their time, thus creating the IULLION the at least some of your claims were valid, because they were not challenged.
YOUR claim, that I want to treat seriously and with respect, and take a real look at,
is that there was a hidden message of "Racism" in reagan picking a site near where some civil rights advocates were murdered.
You failed to mention that it was nearly TWENTY years earlier.
Reagan was a former actor and a former governor of CALIFORNIA, which, as you may know, is on the west coast of the united stated. Thousands of miles from mississippi.
Do you really think that Ronald Reagan, of 1980, knew or cared about the 1964 incident?
Or are you and your fellow lefties just spending way to much time, finding such...coincidents and seeing or inventing patterns that mean nothing, so that you have some "evidence" of racism, becasue in reality, you have NOTHING to support your accusations of racism?
BECAUSE, if you had real shit to back up your claims, YOU WOULD USE THAT REAL SHIT, instead of this...not real shit.
www.independent.co.uk
