• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Newsom Destroys Hannity In Interview

Geoist

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
44,981
Reaction score
41,329
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Left
I'm not always the biggest fan of the guy, but Newsom is great on messaging and God knows we need effective messaging in the Democratic Party!





 
There are no winners in a debate with Hannity, only losers (Hannity) and bigger losers (all of us who had to listen to Hannity.)
You know, one thing you can count on when you watch Hannity. You will walk away stupider than you were when you walked in.
 
Newsome has a 7, great for 2028 after his Saturn Return and he'll have the New Moon if a Democrat wins 2024.
 
I'm not always the biggest fan of the guy, but Newsom is great on messaging and God knows we need effective messaging in the Democratic Party!






Newsom bullshit - talk fast, talk over your opposite, talk bullshit incorrect factoids.
 
Hannity is infamous for not telling the whole truth about things, and I've never seen it displayed so prominently than in that interview. Newsom did a great job in not letting Hannity get away with it.

I give Newsom three thumbs up! (My half-sister is visiting me tonight. :) )

.
 
Newsom bullshit - talk fast, talk over your opposite, talk bullshit incorrect factoids.

I agree that Newsom does talk fast, but in this case I believe he had to do that to correct Hannity, who would make a misleading statement and then quickly try to say something else before Newsom could address what Hannity had said.
 
I agree that Newsom does talk fast, but in this case I believe he had to do that to correct Hannity, who would make a misleading statement and then quickly try to say something else before Newsom could address what Hannity had said.
Which is a common tactic for Hannity since the truth so often fails to support him.
 
I agree that Newsom does talk fast, but in this case I believe he had to do that to correct Hannity, who would make a misleading statement and then quickly try to say something else before Newsom could address what Hannity had said.
Not like Newsom was not making incorrect statements. :rolleyes:
 
I agree that Newsom does talk fast, but in this case I believe he had to do that to correct Hannity, who would make a misleading statement and then quickly try to say something else before Newsom could address what Hannity had said.

Exactly. You have to meet the tone of the opponent (something Dems/libs often fail to do). Newsom did it well.
 
After destroying California, how hard could Hannity be?
 
Not like Newsom was not making incorrect statements. :rolleyes:

To be fair and honest (both of which are sometimes a struggle for me :) ), some of the things they were saying went over my head. But I could still tell when somebody had been corrected, when somebody had to back down, when somebody seemed to be embarrassed, etc. I could still be very wrong, of course, but Hannity seemed to be on the wrong end of that kind of thing more often than Newsom did.
 
Hannity is no debater and Newsome is a good one. It's no surprise Newsome scored some points however saying destroyed is a bit much.

There is a ton of spin here. For example, California is the one state with a completed border wall. GovNewsome is taking a stance that is very inconsistent.
 
Newsom seems like the best Democrat going for this - Bernie is very good also, he had the Fox Town Hall eating out of his hand.

Bernie is also great at messaging. One of the best, imo.
 
To be fair and honest (both of which are sometimes a struggle for me :) ), some of the things they were saying went over my head. But I could still tell when somebody had been corrected, when somebody had to back down, when somebody seemed to be embarrassed, etc. I could still be very wrong, of course, but Hannity seemed to be on the wrong end of that kind of thing more often than Newsom did.
Fine, you're entitled to your own opinions. Newsom is very suave and polished. He can, and did lie without batting an eye. He doesn't understand inflation statistic or global finance.
 
Fine, you're entitled to your own opinions. Newsom is very suave and polished. He can, and did lie without batting an eye. He doesn't understand inflation statistic or global finance.
specifically, what lie(s) did he express during that hannity interview?
 
specifically, what lie(s) did he express during that hannity interview?

Hannity asked Newsom if has received a lot of phone calls to run for president, and he completely dodged answering the question.
 
Back
Top Bottom