- Joined
- Jun 19, 2013
- Messages
- 14,937
- Reaction score
- 17,589
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
No legislation targeted disney. It purely targeted an arm of Florida state government, the Ready Creek Improvement District, states can modify the legal arraignment of state government agencies. This is not attainder. Disney as a private business was not a party fo this legislation
For government offices, such as the post office or social security offices, voter registrars, abso-freaking-lutely they should be open on the weekends.Yeah, I’m sure the other fast food outlets on the thruway rest stops are really heartbroken about more business on Sunday
I wonder if we should pass legislation mandating all government offices and all banks for that matter be open 7 days a week
CF holds actual leases with the thruway.New York is modifying the legal arraignment of state government agencies (New York Thruway Authority and New York Port Authority). CF as a private business was not a party fo this legislation.
No, because the purpose of this legislation is to sidestep the normal contracting process to target one business.So we're good.
Glad to hear.
WW
CF holds actual leases with the thruway.
No, because the purpose of this legislation is to sidestep the normal contracting process to target one business.
Bull. I never said any such thing.. Actually I said a few times the state should not have let CF lease on the Truway knowing that they will be closed on Sunday...Can you people stop gaslighting and just admit you support targeting businesses because you don’t like their owners?
I never claimed it was attainder. I simply compared it to your claim of targeting a specific business because they were unhappy with the owners. Which is what you claim the left is doing. Hypocrisy at its finest.No legislation targeted disney. It purely targeted an arm of Florida state government, the Ready Creek Improvement District, states can modify the legal arraignment of state government agencies. This is not attainder. Disney as a private business was not a party fo this legislation
Yeah but government workers don’t want to work those days. And if Senator crapface actually proposed a bill to do that the public sector workers unions would throw a fit and he’d be out of office since those people own blue state politics.For government offices, such as the post office or social security offices, abso-freaking-lutely they should be open on the weekends.
The real issue is purportedly for the benefit of the monied elite who do weekend road trips he wants to force lower class restaurant workers to workBanks are private businesses though and typically do not lease space from a government entity.
I talked to my wife a bit about this thing and she had an interesting perspective....it helps that the author literally wrote it in, as cited.
Going a day without food is a bit different than going a day without banking services.Yeah, I’m sure the other fast food outlets on the thruway rest stops are really heartbroken about more business on Sunday
I wonder if we should pass legislation mandating all government offices and all banks for that matter be open 7 days a week
Maybe, but having those offices open on the weekends would be good for the poor.Yeah but government workers don’t want to work those days. And if Senator crapface actually proposed a bill to do that the public sector workers unions would throw a fit and he’d be out of office since those people own blue state politics.
are you going Marxist here?The real issue is purportedly for the benefit of the monied elite who do weekend road trips he wants to force lower class restaurant workers to work
Oh yeah I’m sure the thruway is full of starving people who just need a classic chicken sandwich from CfA. Those rest stops are like the border at Tijuana full of starving kids trying to sell you gum. Evil Dan Cathy just won’t feed themGoing a day without food is a bit different than going a day without banking services.
No restaurant is entitled to special access for travelers.
Yeah but not for the workers.Maybe, but having those offices open on the weekends would be good for the poor.
There is some value on Marxian analysis especially since we have a rapacious upper class that accumulated privileges to themselves while acting outraged that others want the same ones. It’s like with CfA, chick fil A has the highest satisfaction of fast food workers in the industry because they always have a weekend day off and are paid above average because the ownership believes in caring for their workers, and now the New York upper class hates them for it.are you going Marxist here?
Good response.On the one side, I would oppose any bill that tried to force a private business to adhere to any hours other than what the business wanted. The basis would not matter. I would doubly oppose any law that made any imposition on a private company based upon religion.
With that said, this bill, as I understand it in the article, does not do this to any private business. What it does is lay out the requirements for a business to be a part of a transportations facility. Religious freedom does nothing to guarantee having a place in another's facilities, especially since they are not forced to be in said facility. They can either comply with the facilities rules, or they can not be there. Their religious freedom is intact and they can run their business any way they want outside of that facility. IF they want in the facility, they have to be willing to abide by the facility's rules. This bill would also apply to say a Jewish business that would normally be closed during their Sabbath's hours, again from what I could glean from the article. Further, the bill does give the exemption to any business already in place at these facilities. So any current Chick-fil-a would not have to stay open on Sunday. It would only apply to any newly opened location within those facilities.
There is no violation of rights here.
Just hire more staff then.Yeah but not for the workers.
It’s kind of like all the hate the libbos we’re heaping on the postal worker who went to the Supreme Court over working on Sundays, even though when he was hired he never had to work sundays then they changed everyone’s schedule for Amazon deliveries because the burgeois wanted their packages on Sunday they wouldn’t be stolen.
Yeah you just went a weird and paranoid direction there.There is some value on Marxian analysis especially since we have a rapacious upper class that accumulated privileges to themselves while acting outraged that others want the same ones. It’s like with CfA, chick fil A has the highest satisfaction of fast food workers in the industry because they always have a weekend day off and are paid above average because the ownership believes in caring for their workers, and now the New York upper class hates them for it.
I’ve always felt the real reason the left hates the oil industry is because it’s the one remaining industrial concern in America where lower educated folks can make great wages and benefits
It certainly provides you, Lindsay, and religious/political hysterics with polemical fodder to shriek "Christian persecution!" even though it's incorrect. I'm sure it will be painted by those types as one step removed from gas chambers.So far the discussion is the mechanics of the law. They are not in dispute.
What needs discussed is what's the intent behind the law? I argue its a way to punish Christianity in the name of States rights to raise revenue via taxation.
Seems like yet another case of the retards in NYC shooting themselves in the foot. They are essentially guaranteeing a successful franchise will not open new stores in their city thus not employing hundreds and potentially thousands. Seem like the same retards that also pulled their idiocy with Amazon.
Leftists are such tragic ****ing retards.
It's not NYC. Unless you're one of those people that when someone mentions NY, you automatically think NYC. If so, then you be you.Seems like yet another case of the retards in NYC shooting themselves in the foot. They are essentially guaranteeing a successful franchise will not open new stores in their city thus not employing hundreds and potentially thousands. Seem like the same retards that also pulled their idiocy with Amazon.
Leftists are such tragic ****ing retards.
Not nyc.. If you read any posts here, except the OP... You would know that... But yeah, lie about this, call names.. Be a Trumpster..Seems like yet another case of the retards in NYC shooting themselves in the foot. They are essentially guaranteeing a successful franchise will not open new stores in their city thus not employing hundreds and potentially thousands. Seem like the same retards that also pulled their idiocy with Amazon.
Leftists are such tragic ****ing retards.
This has zero to do with NYC or outlets in commercial spaces. Does CF even do franchises ?Seems like yet another case of the retards in NYC shooting themselves in the foot. They are essentially guaranteeing a successful franchise will not open new stores in their city thus not employing hundreds and potentially thousands. Seem like the same retards that also pulled their idiocy with Amazon.
Leftists are such tragic ****ing retards.
It certainly is persecution.It certainly provides you, Lindsay, and religious/political hysterics with polemical fodder to shriek "Christian persecution!" even though it's incorrect. I'm sure it will be painted by those types as one step removed from gas chambers.
Were you running about waving your hands overhead in a panic when you posted this? See post #9 and relax the deathgrip on your pearls.It certainly is persecution.
There was no issue with this on New York thruway for 70 years then suddenly when a contract is signed with CfA after review and bidding process by the thruway authority now we have to impose rules to stop CfA.
The democrats openly use public contract bidding as a form of social engineering
This has zero to do with NYC or outlets in commercial spaces. Does CF even do franchises ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?