- Joined
- Mar 21, 2005
- Messages
- 25,893
- Reaction score
- 12,484
- Location
- New York, NY
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
Alex said:If the issue is one of personal choice, and all parties are consenting, the law has no business being involved. What business do you have interfering in someone's personal life?
All the issues that you point out fall under this except children viewing pornography. I am not sure that young children can truly consent to such things.
Our legal system is out of control, eliminating interference in people's personal choices can keep it in control.
Well, its all good and well that you think that, but the fact of the matter is, that's what the government in its current incarnation does.
And if I were to be one to place blame for such things (perish the thought!), I'd place it equally on the far left and the far right who have made it nothing more than their duty to regulate the lives of others for the past few hundred years.
But all this aside, the fact is that the gov does and can regulate these matters, and with that as a precedent, is completely within its scope to do what it does now.