Thrilla
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2011
- Messages
- 20,295
- Reaction score
- 9,801
- Location
- Texas, Vegas, Colombia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
well yeah... it was pretty bad.( you'd know better than I, as I didn't work around any women)It wasn't that long ago. It was around 1999... long after sexual standards in the workplace were required to be in compliance with federal regs. You should have seen the misogynistic workplace zoo that existed in the 1970's and early 1980's. That was bad.
It wasn't that long ago. It was around 1999... long after sexual standards in the workplace were required to be in compliance with federal regs. You should have seen the misogynistic workplace zoo that existed in the 1970's and early 1980's. That was bad.
I did. Yes it was worse back then.
Here is a question, if Cain was not running for Office, would G Alfred have come forward as she has now? Since regs were in place 1999, by not filing a complaint till now makes we wonder of the true motivation. If Cain is guilty, he needs to face the consiquences, if he is not then Alfred needs to face the consiquences of ruining a persons image.
Maybe the NRA will release the details, and then we can all see what the basis for the settlements was. Until then, is it fair to judge Cain guilty?
Hiring a known man-hating lawyer is proof of wrongdoing. :roll:
Maybe the NRA will release the details, and then we can all see what the basis for the settlements was. Until then, is it fair to judge Cain guilty?
That would imply that others made a settlement (often perceived as a guilty party making the charge(s) go away) about him without his approval or knowledge. That would have been like Democrats making a settlement deal with Paula Jones and never informing Clinton.Do you believe Cain was telling the truth initially when he said he was unaware of any financial settlement of sexual harassment claims against him?
That would imply that others made a settlement (often perceived as a guilty party making the charge(s) go away) about him without his approval or knowledge. That would have been like Democrats making a settlement deal with Paula Jones and never informing Clinton.
not exactly. In many cases where an employing business is the actual defendant (for example, the postal service, if an employee is harassed by a supervisor, the defendant is Patrick Donahoe, the Postmaster General). at the administrative level, agency counsel could easily agree to a deal without informing or getting the consent of the supervisor who is accused of the misdeed. Once it gets to court, same thing is true
We're not talking about just any "supervisor," but the president, which was Cain's title at the time with the National Restaurant Association. You may be right that it "can be" done, but it's reasonable to assume the top level person in the company knows what deals are being made about him. If he truly was left in the dark, that doesn't bode well for how he would run the nation as it implies legal settlements can be made about him as president of the United States without his approval or knowledge.not exactly. In many cases where an employing business is the actual defendant (for example, the postal service, if an employee is harassed by a supervisor, the defendant is Patrick Donahoe, the Postmaster General). at the administrative level, agency counsel could easily agree to a deal without informing or getting the consent of the supervisor who is accused of the misdeed. Once it gets to court, same thing is true
Gloria Allred is to sexual harassment cases as Al Sharpton is to race riots and vultures are to dead meat
not exactly. In many cases where an employing business is the actual defendant (for example, the postal service, if an employee is harassed by a supervisor, the defendant is Patrick Donahoe, the Postmaster General). at the administrative level, agency counsel could easily agree to a deal without informing or getting the consent of the supervisor who is accused of the misdeed. Once it gets to court, same thing is true
A new woman alleging sexual harassment by presidential hopeful Herman Cain will break her silence at a news conference with her powerhouse attorney Gloria Allred Monday afternoon in New York City, RadarOnline.com is exclusively reporting.
The embattled GOP nominee has admitted that several women who worked at the National Restaurant Association during his tenure as president of the organization received settlements. Politico has reported that the settlements were given because of sexual harassment allegations.
Herman turning out to be a real Ho :lamo:lamo:lamo
New Woman Accusing Herman Cain Of Sexual Harassment Hires Gloria Allred | Radar Online
Dang Cains political career for president is over.
Based on polls? Nobody seems to care about this much and still support him.
I did. Yes it was worse back then.
Here is a question, if Cain was not running for Office, would G Alfred have come forward as she has now? Since regs were in place 1999, by not filing a complaint till now makes we wonder of the true motivation. If Cain is guilty, he needs to face the consiquences, if he is not then Alfred needs to face the consiquences of ruining a persons image.
I think you need to ease up there.That's all we're ever going to have unless it goes to civil court. Surely the statute of limitations has passed on any criminal charges of harrassment. As for the women bringing civil suits, I don't see that happening. By waiting, they've lost all credibility. Maybe Cain will, but, on the other hand, he just wants it all to go away. Unfortunately, things like this don't have to be proven. And this isn't going away. Cain's through. His ability to raise funds is out the window. How many donors are going to cast their lot with this guy? Nobody smart.
Frankly I don't think Allred's presence really helps the accuser. It sure gives Gloria a lot of face time.Yes your right Gloria Allred is the 4th accusers lawyer so they all must be lieing...LMAO...
Frankly I don't think Allred's presence really helps the accuser. It sure gives Gloria a lot of face time.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?