- Joined
- May 17, 2019
- Messages
- 20,649
- Reaction score
- 2,465
- Location
- Idaho
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Wtf does this have to do with healthcare?
*sigh*
Do you not need tax revenue for your healthcare?
Yes or no?
Wtf does this have to do with healthcare?
So your position is that we can't afford our system, our fully funded system, that's less than half the cost of the American system? The system that's been fully funded since 1957. That's your position?*sigh*
Do you not need tax revenue for your healthcare?
Yes or no?
So your position is that we can't afford our system, our fully funded system, that's less than half the cost of the American system? The system that's been fully funded since 1957. That's your position?
Most Americans opposed to single-payer argue 'that won't work here'. You're arguing it won't work where it's already working.
Weakest one yet.
Your point that we can't afford the system we are currently enjoying, because 'fertility'. That's just weak.That was a great distraction from my point
I commend you
That was a great distraction from my point
I commend you
Your point that we can't afford the system we are currently enjoying, because 'fertility'. That's just weak.
It was not a distraction - he was stating facts. You seem to be using the ‘logic’ that since our Social Security and Medicare ‘Ponzi scheme’ systems are suffering from the boomer bubble that the same method of financing is used to support UHC in Canada.
Under that logic, half of Mississippi should've already moved to Massachusetts or Minnesota. Differences in quality, cost, and accessibility of health care exist across the United States, and yet Americans are apparently quite immobile.
A similar (mistaken) point was made upthread that poor people would flock to California, ignoring the fact that California already embraced universal coverage for the poor over a decade ago when it became one of a handful of states to take up the ACA's option to expand Medicaid early.
Thus far no state has wanted to do it, which is not the same thing.
Things are changing there
You seem to be under the assumption that they're not
You would be better off supplying links to back up your assertions.
Healthcare in Canada - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Lol, so the fertility thing didn't work for you and you've decided the best approach is to double down on vague?Things are changing there
You need a link to know that more non doers are coming into Canada?
Does not HC need tax revenue?
Lol, so the fertility thing didn't work for you and you've decided the best approach is to double down on vague?
Hmm... coming from someone getting publicly funded medical care and claiming to pay no FIT that is precious.
Hmm... coming from someone getting publicly funded medical care and claiming to pay no FIT that is precious.
hey guy, I'm just the messenger
please file all complaints with your local congress critter
They make tax law(wink)
What you're trying to do is claim that immigrants (from shithole countries as you call them) are non-doers. The guy who brags about not paying FIT is making that claim.I can see that you have succumb to the Doers paying for the non doers and the U.S. Gov pissing away the rest?
That's that old American spirit?
They do not make the tax (or healthcare) law in Canada. You seem to be mixing apples and oranges rather freely.
Hmm... coming from someone getting publicly funded medical care and claiming to pay no FIT that is precious.
What you're trying to do is claim that immigrants (from shithole countries as you call them) are non-doers. The guy who brags about not paying FIT is making that claim.
The unemployment rate for immigrants in Canada (who make up 21% of our current population) is very similar to the overall unemployment rate. So they pay their taxes, and help fund the system. Being younger than native born Canadians they also use the system less, so are a larger net benefit to the system.
is very similar to the overall unemployment rate
What you're trying to do is claim that immigrants (from shithole countries as you call them) are non-doers. The guy who brags about not paying FIT is making that claim.
The unemployment rate for immigrants in Canada (who make up 21% of our current population) is very similar to the overall unemployment rate. So they pay their taxes, and help fund the system. Being younger than native born Canadians they also use the system less, so are a larger net benefit to the system.
It is amazing that those getting a public paycheck (and paying no FIT) somehow feel that they are ‘real’ doers.
Overall unemployment rate 9.4%Details please?
Overall unemployment rate 9.4%
Immigrant unemployment rate 10.4%
Immigrants make up 21% of Canada's population, one of the highest proportions in the world
Canada population demographics - overall 17.65% over the age of 65, immigrants only make up only 31% of that total.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/440841/unemployment-rate-in-canada-by-immigrant-status/#:~:text=In 2020, about 10.4 percent,immigrants to Canada were unemployed.Immigrant unemployment rate 10.4%
, one of the highest proportions in the world
And its puzzling also that there are those(you) who would watch the contribution from the doer's and see the U.S. Gov piss the $$$ away(wink)
Man, Americanism sure has changed(wink)
1% higher. Works out to 77K more immigrants based on population. A temporary situation due to Covid lockdowns. Immigrants are more impacted as they disproportionately work in hospitality industries.
But our UHC 'experiment' as you call it is working now isn't it. It's working in every country it's in place - in Germany their little 'experiment' has lasted 138 years.Again, your experiment isn't over(wink)