Why the hell do you need a laser sight on something like an MP5? Especially if you're going to clear a room? At that kind of distance you might as well go with iron sights since they give you more vision to either side as you look down them or you could just look over the top of the sights and align based on the front sight post alone because, again, at that kinda distance you don't need to have a pinpoint accurate sight.
PLUS if you adjust the damn thing while you're outside in the bright sun you'll probably crank it up to max or a notch or two below, then when you go into a darker building your red dot is so bright it blocks your vision of the target.
They gave me a red dot sight in Afghanistan and got angry with me when I took it off, why did I remove it? Because for the last three years at the range I've only ever shot with iron sights, any exercises I've done have always been iron sights, then they give me thing have me zero and not even qualify with it and can't understand why I prefer the old reliable sights.
They have a ways to go. Just look at that crossfire. The dummies would end up shooting each other if rounds were fired.
So British Homeland Security?
If you look at the photo some of the officers are pointing guns at the driver, whilst others at the passengers. In terms of firearms the police in Great Britain are generally unarmed, however those that require firearms have to undergo rigorous training and many organisations in the UK have close links and working relationships with their US and European Counterparts. The NCA will no doubt have a close working relationship with the FBI, just as London's Metropolitan Police has a close working relationship with the NYPD and British Intelligence services such as MI5 and MI6 have close working relationships with the FBI and CIA, and the same is true in terms of international fraud and cyber crime. This working relationships extends to training together and learning from each other and a number of British Police and NCA staff will have attended the FBI Academy, whilst the FBI and other US Agencies have sent officers to attend UK Law Enforcement Courses.
'No one is shot by mistake...': going under cover with Britain's police | Mail Online
I saw that too, more "Mexican stand off" than perimeter control.They have a ways to go. Just look at that crossfire. The dummies would end up shooting each other if rounds were fired.
I'm aware of where they're aiming, but their positioning is a prime example of what you don't do. Bullets can go through people (especially 9mm rounds, which are a high pressure, high velocity round), shooters can miss their target, shooters can panic. What I see in that picture is the wrong way to do it. You never, ever, EVER, get in front of the muzzle of another gun. Ever.
They just became an organization 4 days ago, so they aren't going to be perfect right off the bat. I'm just pointing out that they still have a lot of work to do in order to achieve a higher level of proficiency and effectiveness based on the photographs you've shown.
RIP the iconic British Bobby!