!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!She was probably his mistress!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ....from what marriage though?
Im sure Nancy has some dirty secrets on Newt.
Thanks for taking the high road there Nancy. /sarcasm
This thread is about the recent comments from Pelosi about Gingrich. So no.Like Newt did with Clinton you mean?
So you might change your position because someone else said they might have dirt on him. How responsible.I noted that I do not care for Newt and I had no plans to vote for him. I read this and it makes me rethink my position.
Like Newt did with Clinton you mean?
So you might change your position because someone else said they might have dirt on him. How responsible.
Pointing out how dirty everyone else is doesn't make you any cleaner.
And, today, Pelosi realizes that she let her mouth overload her ass.
Pelosi: On second thought … « Hot Air
:lamo
“Leader Pelosi was clearly referring to the extensive amount of information that is in the public record, including the comprehensive committee report with which the public may not be fully aware,” Hammill wrote in a statement. . . . The public has been aware of the official committee report for more than a decade, and it got very wide play in the media at the time. No one doubts that this report will be rehashed again and again if Gingrich wins the nomination. Part of that conversation, though, will be the IRS’ report clearing Gingrich more than a year later of any wrongdoing, a development that goes a long way to support Gingrich’s contention yesterday that the entire ethics probe was as politicized as Pelosi’s unveiled threat yesterday to reveal sealed records in the probe.
First, I hope whatever she's planning to reveal she learned through channels where she should be making them public and not privledged private information that she plans to expose.
Second, I think its kind of sad and a picture of our political climate that we have a person who clearly seems to believe they have significant evidence that would suggest someone wouldn't be worthy of being President enough to make people vote against him, and yet rather than release said information she's holding onto it for nothing but politcal gamesmenship to attempt to use it not to further the best election process but to further her own parties agenda. Information she likely largely gathered due to her service at the behest of the people as a Representitive in the House. If she's got some big damaging information on Newt she should release it now for the benefit of the American People rather than using information gleamed from her time in public office as a means of political strategy focused on the betterment of the party, not America.
Many of the bills Gingrich and Pelosi co-sponsored were hardly divisive: authorizing an award for Mother Teresa, giving a congressional gold medal to former President Gerald Ford and recognizing the 50th anniversary of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
But one piece of legislation could be problematic for Gingrich with conservatives: the Global Warming Prevention Act of 1989, which never made it out of committee.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?