• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Nailed it.




Good Job Vance.

Your turn , Kamala Harris. Talk to us, the American voters and answer the questions.

The dem ticket is a radical Progressive ticket. That can be shown through interview comments, voting records and attitudes towards situations they have handled. To be proven wrong, Kamala Harris needs to tell us why not.

I don't think Harris needs to tell us anything.
What is it that Vance is telling us? Why should I watch that video? What did he nail?
 
Fixed it, not sure if it was a typo or Freudian slip though
Who is "dear leader" for liberals? Are you referring to Biden?
 



Good Job Vance.

Your turn , Kamala Harris. Talk to us, the American voters and answer the questions.

The dem ticket is a radical Progressive ticket. That can be shown through interview comments, voting records and attitudes towards situations they have handled. To be proven wrong, Kamala Harris needs to tell us why not.


Here is a TRUE Nailed it!

Harris/Walz drawing crowds like Trump has drawn over the past 8 years. That means that Harris/Walz are now as popular in bringing in the kind of cult mentality that Trump has benefitted from since he began. This makes Trump's chances of winning the November election drop substantially as now, the Democrats can expect their people to show up and vote and the reality is that there are more registered-to-vote Democrats than registered-to-vote Republicans.

This is a tangible plus for Harris

HarrisTrumpcomparison.webp
 
Are you saying that Abe Lincoln was trying to destroy our country? The Democrats are following Abe's idea where he believed in this:

View attachment 67524954

I’m not letting the Dems off the hook. Just because they appear less corrupt overall they are still very much part of this broken system.

We, and by we I mean all of us who care about this nation, need to make it very clear, loudly so, that we want changes.

Those changes need to come in anti-corruption law: Campaign finance reform. Term limits. Major ethics rule changes. Lobbying reform. Finally heftier criminal penalties for breaking the law while holding public office.
 



Good Job Vance.

Your turn , Kamala Harris. Talk to us, the American voters and answer the questions.

The dem ticket is a radical Progressive ticket. That can be shown through interview comments, voting records and attitudes towards situations they have handled. To be proven wrong, Kamala Harris needs to tell us why not.

OMG! Couch ****er said something MAGA agrees with!
 
The (so called) ‘border crisis’ isn’t going to be fixed with a few more miles of the Great Wall Of Trump (coupled with a super expensive and impractical “mass deportation” program) and the ‘root cause’ isn’t the lack of US aid or ‘investment’ being given to (try to) ‘fix’ the rest of the world.

What’s causing the problem is the ease of ‘undocumented’ immigrants being able to get US (W-2 or 1099) employment, which is why 20M or so are able to stay here indefinitely. We need a nationwide eVerify system coupled with changes to the federal income tax code to allow adequate enforcement. That alone would cause most of the ‘undocumented’ immigrants to self-deport (or at least relocate to other ‘safe’ countries) and not come (or remain) here illegally in the future.
Okay? Not sure how this is a response to my post. I'm not too worried about immigration, so I'll just take your word for it. There are fixes out there. I don't think the powers that be care about fixing anything. Fixes cost money. The system may be working illegally, but it is efficient.
 
The progressiveness of this ticket is best captured in that Waltz was fiddled while his cities burned during the BLM riots, and Harris was running a contribution effort to bail out the rioters who where burning them down so they could burn down some more.
This post is full of dumb.
 
Remember, fentanyl only because across the US border during the past 3 1/2 years. It was never an issue before that.
 
Okay? Not sure how this is a response to my post. I'm not too worried about immigration, so I'll just take your word for it. There are fixes out there. I don't think the powers that be care about fixing anything. Fixes cost money. The system may be working illegally, but it is efficient.

How is paying folks not to work (while insisting the we need ‘illegal’ immigrant workers) or supplementing their meager paychecks with numerous federal “safety net” programs being “efficient”?
 
How is paying folks not to work (while insisting the we need ‘illegal’ immigrant workers) or supplementing their meager paychecks with numerous federal “safety net” programs being “efficient”?
Again, I have no clue what you're responding to. I made a quip about "nailed it." What does that have to do with immigration or whatever it is you're arguing here?
 
1. During which administration that Kamala Harris was a part of did Russia/ukraine and Israel/Hamas go to war? Weak leadership being evident allowed this.

Putin first invaded and occupied Ukrainian land in 2014.

You don't know this?

Point of fact, no one in the US had the power to stop the Putin and Hamas aggressions.

And with 40,000 dead Gazan civilians, Netanyahu has joined Putin as a war criminal.

2 and 3. both have roots in the border crisis... during which administration did the President task Kamala Harris with stemming the tide at the southern border?

VP Harris was never in charge of stemming the number of border crossings.

Her task was to investigate the reasons why so many Central/Southern Americans were seeking asylum in the US.

Fix the asylum problem at the core, and the border asylum problems will dissipate.
 
Whereas sedition and trying to overturn an election is great for the Republic.

lol

That half day riot at the US Capital was nothing compared to months of rioting, looting and arson resulting from the ‘mostly peaceful’ protests in response to the murder of George Floyd.
 
The (so called) ‘border crisis’ isn’t going to be fixed with a few more miles of the Great Wall Of Trump (coupled with a super expensive and impractical “mass deportation” program) and the ‘root cause’ isn’t the lack of US aid or ‘investment’ being given to (try to) ‘fix’ the rest of the world.

What’s causing the problem is the ease of ‘undocumented’ immigrants being able to get US (W-2 or 1099) employment, which is why 20M or so are able to stay here indefinitely. We need a nationwide eVerify system coupled with changes to the federal income tax code to allow adequate enforcement. That alone would cause most of the ‘undocumented’ immigrants to self-deport (or at least relocate to other ‘safe’ countries) and not come (or remain) here illegally in the future.
Yep
Even the states that bitch and moan the most about illegal immigrants barely, if at all use e-verify... Their business donors love the cheap labor... So those states complain, but do nothing..
 



Good Job Vance.

Your turn , Kamala Harris. Talk to us, the American voters and answer the questions.

The dem ticket is a radical Progressive ticket. That can be shown through interview comments, voting records and attitudes towards situations they have handled. To be proven wrong, Kamala Harris needs to tell us why not.

This isn’t a progressive ticket to me. Just more of the same. What is progressive or radical about her campaign? If you’re going to lie and make up stupid stuff like open borders, save your time.
 
That half day riot at the US Capital was nothing compared to months of rioting, looting and arson resulting from the ‘mostly peaceful’ protests in response to the murder of George Floyd.
In terms of damage, the riots were more damaging. As an act against the Republic, I think an actual act of sedition for the purpose of halting the recording of the EC votes is far more significant.
 
Yep
Even the states that bitch and moan the most about illegal immigrants barely, if at all use e-verify... Their business donors love the cheap labor... So those states complain, but do nothing..

States have trouble trying to help with enforcement of federal immigration laws. If states had the power to ‘discriminate’ against ‘undocumented’ immigrants (other than wasting their time trying to get the federal government to detain and deport them) then many more states would do so - in ways other than making (only?) their state’s employers operate under less competitive labor laws. Allowing those adults to work (and pay state taxes) makes sense if they must also allow their children (often including US citizen ‘anchor babies) to attend public schools and get state funded Medicaid benefits.
 
In terms of damage, the riots were more damaging. As an act against the Republic, I think an actual act of sedition for the purpose of halting the recording of the EC votes is far more significant.

There was a brief pause in, not a halt to, that process.
 
Motive. The motive was to illegally keep Trump in power. The Floyd riots had an entirely different motive.

I doubt those who had their businesses or places of employment destroyed much cared about the alleged motive.
 
There was a brief pause in, not a halt to, that process.

If you are being serious you sound kind of silly.

That assault on the Capitol building was a pretty dark day for the country. Not to be casually dismissed as "a brief pause in a process".

..
 
I doubt those who had their businesses or places of employment destroyed much cared about the alleged motive.
And? This doesn't change anything. The motives were entirely different. Rioting because of police murdering people is much different than trying to overthrow an election.
 
If you are being serious you sound kind of silly.

That assault on the Capitol building was a pretty dark day for the country. Not to be casually dismissed as "a brief pause in a process".

..

There were many more “dark days” caused by the much more widespread 2020 rioting, looting and arson. BTW, J6 was certainly not dismissed (allowing the alleged perps to avoid prosecution) to the extent that the GF riots (and rioters) were.
 
And? This doesn't change anything. The motives were entirely different. Rioting because of police murdering people is much different than trying to overthrow an election.

Repeating your point doesn’t change (or cancel) mine.
 
Back
Top Bottom