- Joined
- Apr 28, 2015
- Messages
- 85,685
- Reaction score
- 72,372
- Location
- Third Coast
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Washington (CNN)Fridays at the DC federal courthouse are typically days of high alert for the press corps trying to discern what special counsel Robert Mueller's next legal action will be. But this Friday, court officials went to extreme measures to ensure it was as difficult as possible to figure out what Mueller's team was doing as the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held a secret and mysterious argument about a grand jury subpoena challenge.
An entire floor of the courthouse was closed to the public and press for more than an hour. During that time, attorneys secretly entered the courthouse to argue before three federal appellate judges over a grand jury subpoena.
Obviously. They didn't even want his or her lawyers to be seen.My guess is that they have a witness they did not want the press to see
My guess is that they have a witness they did not want the press to see
Can I get some clarification here please.....have you or have you not seen the inside of a law school during this life?Source: (CNN) Mystery Mueller mayhem at a Washington court
This is essentially a "Seinfeld" story. It's a story about "nothing". It posits little, and draws no conclusions.
But it is interesting in it's imagery and detail of the extent the court is going through to maintain seal (secrecy). I followed this event on cable today, and when I saw it online from an MSN source I jumped on it to present it here.
I hope you enjoy it!
Source: (CNN) Mystery Mueller mayhem at a Washington court
This is essentially a "Seinfeld" story. It's a story about "nothing". It posits little, and draws no conclusions.
But it is interesting in it's imagery and detail of the extent the court is going through to maintain seal (secrecy). I followed this event on cable today, and when I saw it online from an MSN source I jumped on it to present it here.
I hope you enjoy it!
Obviously. They didn't even want his or her lawyers to be seen.
But I found it interesting experiencing the incident through the eyes & ears of some firsthand observers and public participants. After being desensitized by Trump and his supporters, it brings us back to realizing this is some serious **** going down.
Will be much worse than Watergate.
My guess is that they have a witness they did not want the press to see
Will be much worse than Watergate.
Not at the rate Mr Hatchet Man et al are going......they are failing, Muellers approval rating is in the ditch, this never should have happened....the best of the best these days rather suck.
I regret to inform you that the justice system runs on the consent of the governed.
Understanding that our #1 problem is that we refuse to listen to and take seriously those who did life before us, because we are stupid like that.What an archaic position; nothing runs on the consent of the “governed!”
Source: (CNN) Mystery Mueller mayhem at a Washington court
This is essentially a "Seinfeld" story. It's a story about "nothing". It posits little, and draws no conclusions.
But it is interesting in it's imagery and detail of the extent the court is going through to maintain seal (secrecy). I followed this event on cable today, and when I saw it online from an MSN source I jumped on it to present it here.
I hope you enjoy it!
The mystery of the subpoena appeal appears to date back to early September, when CNN witnessed several lawyers from Mueller's office entering a courtroom to argue against an unknown defense team before a trial-level judge who oversees federal grand jury-related cases.
Understanding that our #1 problem is that we refuse to listen to and take seriously those who did life before us, because we are stupid like that.
Thanks for posting this.Source: (CNN) Mystery Mueller mayhem at a Washington court
This is essentially a "Seinfeld" story. It's a story about "nothing". It posits little, and draws no conclusions.
But it is interesting in it's imagery and detail of the extent the court is going through to maintain seal (secrecy). I followed this event on cable today, and when I saw it online from an MSN source I jumped on it to present it here.
I hope you enjoy it!
Yes, you are correct. This has been going-on for awhile, even if not discussed here on DP.I'm surprised (though, perhaps I shouldn't be) that so many in this thread seem to be unaware of this stuff. I mean, it's been going on for months.
The speculation has been running rampant for a long time. I guess it's time for DP members to do their own speculating.
As always, I'll wait for facts.
Mueller's approval has been notching up recently. I think it was 56-37 approve/disapprove in Fox' recent poll.Not at the rate Mr Hatchet Man et al are going......they are failing, Muellers approval rating is in the ditch, this never should have happened....the best of the best these days rather suck.
The last poll I saw had Mueller approval at 43.....really bad for the best guy for a very important job, a guy who has had most of a life with the best training available to get ready. My power is out and I am not good at this phone thing so I have no link.Mueller's approval has been notching up recently. I think it was 56-37 approve/disapprove in Fox' recent poll.
Source: (CNN) Mystery Mueller mayhem at a Washington court
This is essentially a "Seinfeld" story. It's a story about "nothing". It posits little, and draws no conclusions.
But it is interesting in it's imagery and detail of the extent the court is going through to maintain seal (secrecy). I followed this event on cable today, and when I saw it online from an MSN source I jumped on it to present it here.
I hope you enjoy it!
Ah, sorry to hear that. Been there. It was in the 40's I believe, awhile back. But, it's been moving back up since the early summer.The last poll I saw had Mueller approval at 43.....really bad for the best guy gor a very important job, a guy who has had most of a life to get ready. My power is out and I am not good at this phone thing so I have no link.
Thanks for all the effort.Damn. This thing was all over CNN. They were tracking the cars coming and going and didn't seem to see any indication of the first family. But yes, someone pretty rich and/or powerful.
Who I want it to be:
1. Matt Whitaker- It's my suspicion that Trump is right to be fearful of the leakers and the wiretaps in his circle. He is doing some illegal crap and everyone including the Mueller knows it! Mueller, like the rest of the public also knows about the high turnover rate at the WH! It is not a stretch to suggestion that Whitaker is a spy for Mueller pretending to spy for Trump. Yup I believe that fits the definition of a double agent. Trump thinks that Whitaker is his loyal servant, the Mueller has employed him to keep an eye out for them, while he tells Trump he is keeping an eye out for them.
Who it probably is:
1. Maria Butina- Russia is sending the signals out to all it's assassins that Butina's time is up. They have publicly disowned her after their pitiful attempt at accusing the US gov't of torturing her. In fact, the US prosecutors have been given the permission to move Butina with the option of testifying under a sealed filing that was made public by 'mistake.'
Part II: Is this a Russian trap set by Mueller? Did they purposely misfile it to see just how important Butina is to their country? Does this mean the reports of Mueller finishing up his investigation is indeed true?
2. Erik Prince- In January 11, 2017 Prince met in the Seychelles with the UAE in which Prince presented himself as Trump's unofficial representative to get back-channel communications to Russia. In December Prince met with Trump's transition team probably to discuss this deal. With the report that just came out recently, about Mueller moving in on other countries' ties to Trussia collusion, I would bet good money that it is Prince.
There's been a lot of wishful tweeting about who it was so let's clear the air here.
Who it Probably isn't:
1. Donald Trump (Himself)- Trump didn't have anything on his schedule today, and he's not scheduled to leave DC until this weekend. Trump has been "practicing" ditching the press for a few weeks. So it's not a stretch to think that Trump might have wanted to keep this indictment all under wraps, but that sounds pretty hard and there's been no indication that Trump has agreed to cooperate. The leaky WH would never have been able to keep it secret.
2. Members of Trump family (except Jared): I've seen Jared slink off away from the family, so it might be him. But it's not Ivanka, Eric or Trump JR (he's in Canada apparently).
Gotta say, I'm having fun with this speculationopcorn2: opcorn2:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?