• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

My thoughts exactly

I often wonder why women think they have the right to circumcise their sons and then are surprised when those sons grow up thinking controlling other people's bodies is ok.

Maybe if women stop mutilating their penis these boys will stop legislating their vagina, what do you think?
It might surprise you that fathers are involved in this decision also. And there are no laws about circumcision. It is a family decision, not a government's.
So this stretch of an argument on your part is a great big fail.
 
I often wonder why women think they have the right to circumcise their sons and then are surprised when those sons grow up thinking controlling other people's bodies is ok.

Maybe if women stop mutilating their penis these boys will stop legislating their vagina, what do you think?
So, abortion bans are "payback" for circumcision? Hatred for mothers?

Wow! Could have just made that policy instead, and banned circumcision until 18. That would have actually solved your grievance. So, abortion bans are a crime of passion? Bizarre!
 
So you can't actually demonstrate or prove tax money goes towards abortion in violation of the Hyde Amendment. Got it!
Good thing I never claimed it does ✌️

Would you like a class on basic budgeting? Suppose you smoke, and are short on money for bills, and a relative offers you some money with the stipulation you can't use it on ciggaretts. You accept their help and comply with their wish by taking your own money you were going to put towards bills and use it to buy cigarettes. Since non of their money went towards cigarettes, you technically complied even though you wouldn't have been able to buy cigarettes without their help.

Same with the Hyde Amendment.
 
I'm just out here giving away free Google searches. You two are welcome to continue your debate 😊 🍵

And to show your post and "statistic" failed. If you want it to remain relevant to the discussion, please quote what you claimed, with the link, so we can see the context.

☮️🇺🇸☮️
 
You're welcome to that opinion but as a medical procedure subject to regulation, abortion will always be governed by public policy.

Great...why is it denied to women that choose it? Does "public policy" deny any other safer medical procedures to men or women?

☮️🇺🇸☮️
 
Great...why is it denied to women that choose it? Does "public policy" deny any other safer medical procedures to men or women?

☮️🇺🇸☮️
Public policy is what will protect her access to it, too.

To say abortion shouldn't be public policy is to say there should be no legal protection for it.
 
Quote it. I looked. I'm not fishing thru it.

🇺🇸 ☮️ 🇺🇸
Sure, give me your address so I can come over and click the buttons on your mouse to bring it up on your screen. Then you'll ask me to read it to you, which I'm happy to do. Do you need help wiping your arse, too? I'm here for whatever you need 😊
 
Quote it. I looked. I'm not fishing thru it.

🇺🇸 ☮️ 🇺🇸
If someone quotes a portion, the link they provide will bring you back to the whole thing and you'll still have to fish through it to verify they quoted accurately and also to validate context.

A helpful tip:
You can Ctrl-A, Ctrl-C, open a word doc and Ctrl-V, then do a key word switch and it'll show you exactly where that information is.

No fishing required.
 
Public policy is what will protect her access to it, too.

Why necessary to protect her access to a much safer medical procedure?

To say abortion shouldn't be public policy is to say there should be no legal protection for it.

No it's not, not anymore than access to any other safe medical procedure. Why is it legislated differently?

☮️ 🇺🇸 ☮️
 
Sure, give me your address so I can come over and click the buttons on your mouse to bring it up on your screen. Then you'll ask me to read it to you, which I'm happy to do. Do you need help wiping your arse, too? I'm here for whatever you need 😊

A lot of typing to say you made it up.

☮️🇺🇸☮️
 
If someone quotes a portion, the link they provide will bring you back to the whole thing and you'll still have to fish through it to verify they quoted accurately and also to validate context.

A helpful tip:
You can Ctrl-A, Ctrl-C, open a word doc and Ctrl-V, then do a key word switch and it'll show you exactly where that information is.

No fishing required.

No, quoting a portion provides the actual information in context that someone can then find and read more about, if needed.

Have you done this before? Is this new for you?

☮️🇺🇸☮️
 
Back
Top Bottom