• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Mueller got some answers, but he's not done with Trump

Gaugingcatenate said:
So you are indirectly admitting those statements were not anywhere included in your original document link.

That is number 1.

Two? Simply, you are using fake news sources. At least they, both the Times and Newsweek, are acknowledging that this stuff is totally unverified. Ie., from above, " according to a New York Times investigation published Tuesday" "report alleged that" "according to The Times" "made by unnamed members were obtained by The Times" "Those depositions reportedly showed that"... no facts, just a lotta alleging.

How many weasel phrasings can you put into two short paragraphs? I mean, seriously? You think including this muddle would make one a top-notch political sleuth, do you?

And that, remember, is just extrapolating from one, the original first paragraph, in the first post to which I replied. You got so much going wrong that it makes the head spin... is that what you were relying on, nobody looking at the meat of what you are mistakenly portending...and if they did going into a massive screamingly overwhelming cognitively downward vortex?

Its a joke, you folks base everything on initial assumptions which, even when amorphously nebulous, are comically false... IOW, unadulterated laughable bull****.

May work with your lefty heavy weight "intellects", but the rest of us don't tend to think like we were born yesterday...
Click to expand...

When one is a Trump cultist, there is no need to think at at all. Just drink the kool-aid and blindly stumble through life.
 
Logician Man said:
When one is a Trump cultist, there is no need to think at at all. Just drink the kool-aid and blindly stumble through life.
Click to expand...
Thats very weak lemonade flavored kool-aid yourself have made out of your own fake lemons that you got going there, bro.

But any of it logical? Not one single bit. See, we all notice you didn't even take the time to deny all the equivocationally misleading statements contained in the two paragraphs. Trash reporting absolutely devoid of proven facts provided in either of the referenced paragraphs reported on by the NYT.

So...

You one of those heavyweight "intellects" I was alluding to in that post?
 
Logician Man said:
When one is a Trump cultist, there is no need to think at at all. Just drink the kool-aid and blindly stumble through life.
Click to expand...

There is nothing helpful or pretty about deluded democrat socialists hooked on Alinsky.
 
marke said:
There is nothing helpful or pretty about deluded democrat socialists hooked on Alinsky.
Click to expand...

Jesus was a socialist. Using your logic, he must have been 'deluded.'
 
Gaugingcatenate said:
I see how you "fixed" yours and, well, I like mine functioning perfectly much better.
Click to expand...

As I recall, 'Hal' mumbled the same thing before being shut down for serious 'maintenance. " :)
 
EnigmaO01 said:
I would not be surprised by anything in this country. We have a lot of stupid ignorant people here. More than I ever imagined.
Click to expand...

I would completely agree with you. let's start with the morons who think borders should be completely open. Then we can move on to the idiots who think Trump will be formally charged with anything from the Meuller witch hunt. Then we can move on to those misinformed poor souls who think white people are bad, and then to the silliness that propagates the stupid idea that Nationalism = Nazism.

For starters...
 
Gaugingcatenate said:
So you are indirectly admitting those statements were not anywhere included in your original document link.

That is number 1.

Two? Simply, you are using fake news sources. At least they, both the Times and Newsweek, are acknowledging that this stuff is totally unverified. Ie., from above, " according to a New York Times investigation published Tuesday" "report alleged that" "according to The Times" "made by unnamed members were obtained by The Times" "Those depositions reportedly showed that"... no facts, just a lotta alleging.

How many weasel phrasings can you put into two short paragraphs? I mean, seriously? You think including this muddle would make one a top-notch political sleuth, do you?

And that, remember, is just extrapolating from one, the original first paragraph, in the first post to which I replied. You got so much going wrong that it makes the head spin... is that what you were relying on, nobody looking at the meat of what you are mistakenly portending...and if they did going into a massive screamingly overwhelming cognitively downward vortex?

Its a joke, you folks base everything on initial assumptions which, even when amorphously nebulous, are comically false... IOW, unadulterated laughable bull****.

May work with your lefty heavy weight "intellects", but the rest of us don't tend to think like we were born yesterday...
Click to expand...

Two? Simply, you are using fake news sources. At least they, both the Times and Newsweek, are acknowledging that this stuff is totally unverified. Ie., from above, " according to a New York Times investigation published Tuesday" "report alleged that" "according to The Times" "made by unnamed members were obtained by The Times" "Those depositions reportedly showed that"... no facts, just a lotta alleging.
Click to expand...


<The Times reported that President Trump received $413 million from his father Fred Trump over the span of decades, mostly through tax dodges that may have been illegal. The story, which TIME has not been able to independently verify, contradicts Trump’s claim that he is a self-made billionaire who built his real-estate empire from a $1 million loan from his father that he paid back with interest.>


Of course… ("Report alleged that “AND report alleged that "according to The Times" made by unnamed members were obtained by The Times" "Those depositions reportedly showed that") that’s what reporters say before the crime of decades of tax fraud.

In a banana republic which trump is envious of, we would show deference to the dictator of a said banana republic.:2wave:

NY State Tax Department Reviewing Trump for Potential Tax Fraud | Time
 
GDViking said:
Mueller has managed to keep his investigation and progress completely confidential. So far it appears to be the best run investigation of this type in my lifetime.

He is an absolute professional if there wasn't something to investigate he would have closed it a long time ago.

I predict that when he finishes, we will learn that trump is one of the most corrupt Americans in history, and there will be so many charges brought against him that Republicans will have. O choice but to distance themselves from him and support impeachment...
Click to expand...

Mueller is a corrupt establishment thug actually with a long history of such behavior as hiding evidence, wrongful conviction, and wrongful death. Not to mention his revolving door cash scheme with Comey.

This is common knowledge if you are interested.

Wrongfully Convicted Men Awarded $101M

" Peter Limone waves as he exits U.S. District Court in Boston, Thursday, Nov. 16, 2006. Limone is one of four men in a lawsuit alleging the FBI failed to disclose critical evidence to prosecutors who ended up winning convictions against them. Limone and Joseph Salvati each spent more than 30 years in prison for murder. Louis Greco and Henry Tameleo both died behind bars before being exonerated. In 2000, a Justice Department task force uncovered secret FBI memos showing the men had been wrongly convicted based on perjured testimony."

Come clean on FBI frame-up, Bob Mueller

"A federal judge Thursday ordered the government to pay more than $101 million in the case of four men who spent decades in prison for a 1965 murder they did not commit after the FBI withheld evidence of their innocence.

The judge called the government's defense that the FBI had no duty to get involved because it was a state case "absurd."

Peter Limone, Joseph Salvati and the families of the two other men who died in prison had sued the federal government for malicious prosecution.

They argued Boston FBI agents knew mob hitman Joseph "The Animal" Barboza lied when he named them as killers in the 1965 death of Edward Deegan. They said Barboza was protecting a fellow FBI informant, Vincent "Jimmy" Flemmi, who was involved.

The government argued that federal authorities had no duty to share information with state officials who prosecuted Limone, Salvati, Henry Tameleo and Louis Greco. Federal authorities cannot be held responsible for the results of a state prosecution, a Justice Department lawyer argued.

The men's lawyers said the four were treated as "acceptable collateral damage" in the FBI's priority at the time — taking down the Mafia through the use of criminal informants.

"It took 30 years to uncover this injustice, and the government's position is, in a word, absurd," U.S. District Judge Nancy Gertner said Thursday."


Docs Show Mueller’s FBI Denied Justice To Four Innocent Men

Professional Crook Perhaps.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom