• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Mr. Musk restores the vomit's Twitter account and his right to spread his vile seditious lies

Nickyjo said:
I assume not. What’s your point? If you insult another poster as Trump did various people, I presume there would be consequences.
Click to expand...
The point is there was no reason to ban him other than leftists want to limit opposing views. Thats why you libs were so pissed that someone calling for free speech on the platform was taking over.
 
Fletch said:
The point is there was no reason to ban him other than leftists want to limit opposing views. Thats why you libs were so pissed that someone calling for free speech on the platform was taking over.
Click to expand...
Start insulting people on this forum, esp because of their nationality, and see what happens. Trump has no one to blame but himself, but he loves to play the victim.
 
I'm in favor of this.

Everyone remembers why they loathe Trump, twitter turns into a right wing sewer like Gab, and Musk does himself financial harm.

There is nothing not good about this.
 
CLAX1911 said:
Damn first amendment always getting in the way.
Click to expand...
Unless I miss your point, as I understand the Constitution, the First Amendment is not applicable on Twitter, nor here. It says "Congress shall make no law," not Twitter or Debate Politics.
 
Nickyjo said:
Unless I miss your point, as I understand the Constitution, the First Amendment is not applicable on Twitter, nor here.
Click to expand...
Yeah it does. Musk as well as the owners of this board can reinstate whoever they like. They have the right of association.

Nickyjo said:
It says "Congress shall make no law," not Twitter or Debate Politics.
Click to expand...
But Twitter is reinstating people they have the right to do that it's their company.

Making a law against these people being allowed to return would be a violation of the first amendment. The company policy already exists they've returned.
 
Helix said:
After he spent 44 billion with unbanning the precious as a goal, it isn't surprising that he actually unbanned the precious
Click to expand...
Wow
 
Nickyjo said:
Unless I miss your point, as I understand the Constitution, the First Amendment is not applicable on Twitter, nor here. It says "Congress shall make no law," not Twitter or Debate Politics.
Click to expand...
Unless it is the gvt. telling them to suppress speech.
 
CLAX1911 said:
Yeah it does. Musk as well as the owners of this board can reinstate whoever they like. They have the right of association.


But Twitter is reinstating people they have the right to do that it's their company.

Making a law against these people being allowed to return would be a violation of the first amendment. The company policy already exists they've returned.
Click to expand...
I agree, the First Amendment has nothing to do with censorship here or on Twitter. But are we talking past one another, that is, what did you mean by "yeah it does?"
 
CLAX1911 said:
You really are scared of him aren't you?
Click to expand...
I, for one, am indeed scared of a would be fascist leader who puts down blacks, immigrants, international institutions, the media, various women, who endorses war crimes and torture, and who has never to my knowledge accepted the results of an election that displeases him. He can hump the flag all he wants, but this orange sack of shit is not a loyal American.
 
Nickyjo said:
I, for one, am indeed scared of a would be fascist leader who puts down blacks, immigrants, international institutions, the media, various women, who endorses war crimes and torture, and who has never to my knowledge accepted the results of an election that displeases him. He can hump the flag all he wants, but this orange sack of shit is not a loyal American.
Click to expand...
That's fear mongering, try not being so easily manipulated. Trump wasn't fascist. Learn what that word means before using it.
 
CLAX1911 said:
If you knew what you were doing you wouldn't need to play the semantics angle.
Click to expand...
This ^ doesn’t make any sense, which makes perfect sense coming from you.

Don’t be such Trumpster. Take responsibility for your gaffes.
 
CLAX1911 said:
That's fear mongering, try not being so easily manipulated. Trump wasn't fascist. Learn what that word means before using it.
Click to expand...
Here below is a definition. Fairly close to Trump.

If one looks at historical examples, one could do worse than compare Trump to Mussolini. Benito wanted to make Italy great again, harkening back to some past time of glory. And Hitler was famously depicted as some Teutonic knight from the past. Hitler had enemies like Jews that he compared to vermin. Trump had immigrants whom he compared to poisonous snakes. Franco had his name on coins with the inscription, "caudillo of Spain for the glory of God." Trump worshippers on the religious right see him as an imperfect King David doing God's will. Mussolini had his march on Rome, and Hitler had his attempted Munich putsch. Trump had his attempted putsch on Jan 6. Trump famously said "I alone can fix it." Can't get much more fascist than that. In addition, Trump praised torture and said we should "take out the families" of terrorists, mirroring the collective punishments the Nazis doled out to the resistance in occupied Europe. He reportedly complained when a drone wasn't fired til a suspected terrorist left his home, thus sparing his family. This guy likes torture and murder. Own it.

www.merriam-webster.com

Definition of FASCISM

a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible… See the full definition
www.merriam-webster.com www.merriam-webster.com

www.theatlantic.com

Trump's Claim: ‘I Alone Can Fix It’

Breaking with two centuries of political tradition, the presidential nominee didn’t ask Americans to place their trust in each other or in God, but rather, in him.
www.theatlantic.com www.theatlantic.com
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom