- Joined
- Sep 30, 2019
- Messages
- 50,520
- Reaction score
- 74,356
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Well this just gets more and more stupid.What if there isn’t a doctor involved
Well this just gets more and more stupid.What if there isn’t a doctor involved
So it's women you don't trust.What if there isn’t a doctor involved
It's like he's visiting us from 1950.Abortion is between a woman and her doctor. It's none of your business. Keep your nose out of it and mind your own business
Or Missouri.It's like he's visiting us from 1950.
Well it does you haven’t understood the rulingIt does not. Doctors won't do it. What part of this don't you understand?
Canada has had legalized abortion for 40 years. Your hysterical doomsday scenario hasn't happened.
So, you think this isn't just license to terminate two days before delivery, it induces and incentivizes?Well it does you haven’t understood the ruling
So no answer to my initial question?So it's women you don't trust.
What if there's a woman doctor involved?
You're pretending that you have so much morality in your judgement that you need to have a say in every abortion decision. You need to draw lines and define terms.
Abortion is between a woman and her doctor. It's none of your business. Keep your nose out of it and mind your own business
Look just be honest on were you stand on thisSo, you think this isn't just license to terminate two days before delivery, it induces and incentivizes?
You haven't understood anything. This is not new for much of the developed world.Well it does you haven’t understood the ruling
I was. Bodily autonomy.Look just be honest on were you stand on this
What if there's no doctor involved? Really?So no answer to my initial question?
Can you, just for a second, try to understand the point? The fact that you're bringing up doctors shows you're missing it. You are a smart guy give me at least the tiny bit of respect that this is different from your hair trigger response.You haven't understood anything. This is not new for much of the developed world.
Your dumb positions and insane scenarios were shrieked by every street corner, tin foil hat wearing nutter every time laws were relaxed.
And guess what - doctors and their patients were able to make sound decisions.
If you want to help go save a whale and leave women alone.
The law applies to doctors and their patients.The fact that you're bringing up doctors shows you're missing it.
You have just gone on attack mode without understanding it’s the whole pointWhat if there's no doctor involved? Really?
Why do you imagine an abortion with no doctor involved? It's a ridiculous scenario.
It decriminalises women performing their own abortions up to the point of birthThe law applies to doctors and their patients.
This is a really dumb OP. Those things tend to attract derision.You have just gone on attack mode without understanding it’s the whole point
It decriminalises women performing their own abortions up to the point of birth
Which you find hilarious
Your imagined excesses is the whole point?You have just gone on attack mode without understanding it’s the whole point
You have just gone on attack mode without understanding it’s the whole point
You just haven’t understoodThis is a really dumb OP. Those things tend to attract derision.
Your attitude toward women is so outdated you may as well be complaining about their right to vote.
Then restate what you think is the problem.You just haven’t understood
Here...Then restate what you think is the problem.
It decriminalises women performing their own abortions up to the point of birth
It’s not really an argument. I’m asking where you stand on this? Nobody seems to be bothered to actually read what this amendment meansIf you think @Grand Mal was attacking you, I have a massive bridge to sell you. Stop being so defensive, and recognize that your argument got demolished.
What I can gather, he thinks a woman might carry a pregnancy to term and then 'abort' it a day before it's due.Then restate what you think is the problem.