- Joined
- Mar 5, 2008
- Messages
- 113,008
- Reaction score
- 60,588
- Location
- Sarasota Fla
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
thanks for confirming your hypocrisy. ignorant rhetoric is still ignorance. the fact that you defend it is, indeed, interesting
In that area of MO all you need is an (R) after your name to win. It doesn't matter who or what you are. If you can pass muster to get the R behind your name you're good to go, and that doesn't take anything but the ability to parrot the Party Line.90% of the population are morons. What is surprising is that this guy has managed to rise to relatively high political office being one.
What did I defend? Nothing that I can see. I pointed out that there is a difference between rhetoric and ignorance, not that one is better than the other. Building that straw man is not going to work for you Oscar.
In that area of MO all you need is an (R) after your name to win. It doesn't matter who or what you are. If you can pass muster to get the R behind your name you're good to go, and that doesn't take anything but the ability to parrot the Party Line.
whatever you have to tell yourself chief
I don't know NY well enough to judge - do you? But I do know that part of Missouri.kind of like how charlie rangel keeps getting elected?
Mitt Romney called Rep. Todd Akin's suggestion that "legitimate rape" cannot make a woman pregnant "offensive" and "inexcusable."
In an interview with National Review's Robert Costa, the presumptive Republican nominee joined a growing number of GOP officials calling on the congressman to "correct" his statement.
"Congressman's Akin comments on rape are insulting, inexcusable and, frankly, wrong," Romney said. "Like millions of other Americans, we found them to be offensive."
What the person meant was an actual rape versus a claimed rape.
Akin has a knack for making news when he speaks, because he unapologetically expresses very conservative views on issues that most politicians won’t touch with a 10-foot poll (wanting to re-litigate civil rights laws, comparing federal student loans to stage 3 cancer and opposing federal funding for school lunches – and that’s just in the past few days).
I understand and it's intuitive to me, that if a woman is under stress, she is less likely to get pregnant, but your links don't directly address rape as a trigger.
If you have unprotected sex you have 5% chance of getting pregnant and that is the same rate of pregnancy from rape.
Another reason I challenge this is the congressman's assertion: "If it's a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.
He seems to be implying if it's not a "legitimate" rape, then pregnancy will result, thus calling the question as to whether the woman who gets pregnant was actually raped.
Well, I guess it's time for me to sound like the Kenyan's spin machine.
What the person meant was an actual rape versus a claimed rape.
Now tell me that the above isn't what the Dims would say if one of their folks had made that stupid comment.
A L
That is not true. See above.
Rape triggers a stress response which is shown to lower the chances of regular ovulation, conception, and viable pregnancy.
I feel like it's insane I have to disclaim this, but given how people have responded thus far, I will: I am not defending the anti-choicer in the OP. I am defending scientific accuracy. It does not matter to me if the chances are lower. Women who are raped deserve access to abortion. Any woman deserves access to abortion. However, I will not abandon accuracy to make that point. I don't have to.
Right here.
http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...arely-results-pregnancy-3.html#post1060814702
Extreme stress reduces the chances of not only conception, but also viable pregnancy. Early miscarriage is very common even under the best of circumstances. It is not as though birth is inevitable whenever conception occurs. It is actually more likely it will be expelled. And even more so when under extreme stress.
Some women who are raped will still become pregnant and maintain the pregnancy. But it is less likely. If they do, it does not make their rape any less "legitimate." But it is scientifically true that it is less likely.
Did Todd Akin get his misinformation on rape and pregnancy from Physicians for Life?
The Physicians for Life site quotes 3 sources, only one is original research. The one article was authored by Goth and published in the New England Journal of Medicine, 1977 (yes, 1977) and in NO WAY SUPPORTS THE NOTION THAT RAPES ARE RARE OR THAT THE STRESS RESPONSE LOWERS THE PREGNANCY RATE. It is an article about sexual dysfunction among rapists. Put another way, the Physicians for Life have not provided a single published article to support their claims. Interestingly, Physicians for Life also promote the long disproven claim that abortion causes breast cancer.
There are obvious difficulties in studying rape outcomes as “only 16 to 38% of rape victims report the rape to law enforcement, and only 17 to 43% present for medical evaluation after rape; one-third of victims of rape never report the assault to their primary care doctor.” (NEJM 2011). However, a scientific estimate (i.e. from research) is between 25,000 and 32,000 pregnancies from rape a year in the United States (American Journal Obstetrics and Gynecology 1996 and American Journal of Preventative Medicine 2000).
Just to put those numbers into perspective, about 22,000 women a year in the United States develop ovarian cancer. No one thinks that’s rare. About 32,000 American women get melanoma every year (American Cancer Society, 2012). No one thinks that’s rare either.
It is not "scientifically true" that a rape victim is less likely to become pregnant than a woman engaging in consensual sex.
a bit more from a doctor (board-certified OB-Gyn)
90% of the population are morons. What is surprising is that this guy has managed to rise to relatively high political office being one.
How do you purpose getting statistics on women 'claiming' rape to get a legal abortion?
And if the girl is below the age of consent -- it was statutory rape.
The idiots in the suburbs around St. Louis!
I've got a friend there and sometimes I fear for his political well-being. Like any of us he can be influenced by his neighbors - and in his case his neighbors are, well, not the sharpest knives in the drawer as far as their convictions go.
Of course it is, that doesn't mean the guy's right.
Romney is running away from him. Karl Rove is pulling his superpac money from him. Some GOPers are telling him to drop from the race. It's not looking good for the 'ol boy.
Sounds more like he did the Left thing.
I don't know NY well enough to judge - do you? But I do know that part of Missouri.
Moderator's Warning: |
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?