- Joined
- May 22, 2012
- Messages
- 118,369
- Reaction score
- 83,659
- Location
- Uhland, Texas
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
I did not promote anyone who sees deporting immigrants as essential.
See posts #25 and #55.
I did not promote anyone who sees deporting immigrants as essential.
So is overpaying them.Then maybe it's time some of these agreements should be reexamined.
Employees are a revenue center, not a cost center. Underpaying them is counterproductive at best.
Do you realize how idiotic this post is? Throwing insults at me make you feel better?
So is overpaying them.![]()
The person I was responding to said they don’t.Who said they don't?
Until the work force puts up the capital, takes the risk, and comes up with the innovation that provides labor their jobs, your point is moot.
I noodled over the idea that (at least for publicly traded companies) there should be a formula. The CEO can only make XX more than the lowest paid worker in the company. The President's wage can only rise if the low guy's wage rises too.
And? Where do I promote anyone who sees deporting immigrants as essential?See posts #25 and #55.
And? Where do I promote anyone who sees deporting immigrants as essential?
Chavez increasingly blamed the failure of the UFW strike on illegal immigrants who were brought in as strikebreakers. He made the unsubstantiated claim that the CIA was involved in part of a conspiracy to bring illegal migrants into the country so that they could undermine his union. He launched the "Illegals Campaign" to identify illegal migrants so that they could be deported, appointing Liza Hirsch to oversee the campaign. In Chavez's view, "if we can get the illegals out of California, we will win the strike overnight." This was a reiteration of an early view he expressed concerning the problems the UFW boycott faced in 1972; Chavez believed that illegal labor could undermine any strike undertaken by agricultural workers could be undermined by "wetbacks" and "illegal immigrants". Huerta urged him not to refer to migrants who had come to the U.S. illegally as "illegals" but Chavez refused, stating: "a spade's a spade." Some UFW field offices refused to collaborate with the campaign, and the National Lawyers Guild (NLG) refused to allow its interns to work on it, at which Chavez cut the UFW's links with the NLG.
You cited Wikipedia? Anyone can edit Wikipedia. Dont leave out what he accomplished. Even if scabs broke rank, Chavez broke the owners and secured higher wages for farmworkers. The owners, people who thought like you, were never going to pay higher wages. They used to charge workers for water. You would of fit right in.You must not be very familiar with your hero César Estrada Chávez.
![]()
Cesar Chavez - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
You cited Wikipedia? Anyone can edit Wikipedia.
Their write-up on Chavez does look comprehensive. Except the UFW strike didn't fail in the end. It took years, but Chavez succeeded.In fairness, their staff is pretty damn quick to nuke edits.
I know this, because they followed me around for AGES deleting my shit, until they banned me. Just for saying that Cal Coolidge ended his life as a one-legged rent boy.
Hmmm THIS is actually an interesting concept . . i dont know if it I would make it as you say but a ratio over the whole comapany might be something Id support if done properly . . . .I NEVER could convince myself to support a cap so I was never able to come up with a solution but a ratio might be something very nice . . this way all the profit still goes into the company as with a hard cap I was sure where the money would go . . . .
In fairness, I didn't know that Chavez accused border patrol of allowing illegal immigrants Into the U.S.. Apparently, Chavez thought they were being let in on purpose to break the strike. I admired Chavez for his efforts that were instrumental in passing the nation's first farm labor act in California. It legalized collective bargaining and gave farmworkers rights and raised their wages. That's why I cited Chavez.You must not be very familiar with your hero César Estrada Chávez.
![]()
Cesar Chavez - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
It might actually have the effect of a rising tide raising all the boats.Hmmm THIS is actually an interesting concept . . i dont know if it I would make it as you say but a ratio over the whole comapany might be something Id support if done properly . . . .I NEVER could convince myself to support a cap so I was never able to come up with a solution but a ratio might be something very nice . . this way all the profit still goes into the company as with a hard cap I was sure where the money would go . . . .
Correction: the strike failed.... The boycott succeeded.Their write-up on Chavez does look comprehensive. Except the UFW strike didn't fail in the end. It took years, but Chavez succeeded.
Just say " let them eat cake" and be done with it. The disparity between the poor and the rich is getting wider everyday.
The reality is, nothing gets done without everyone doing their part. The arrogance of owners and upper management to believe they would be where they are without all those low level cogs is astounding.
that's interesting.
good . Open up your own fast food place and pay your workers those kind of wages. Let us know how long you last.When folks think that burger workers and waiters/waitresses should not be paid $17.50 per hour that is astounding considering $17.50 per hour @ 40 hours per week is only $33,000 per year which is not much money.
Who cares what you think. If you want to pay the unskilled, uneducated and inexperienced more than minimum, open a business and do it. There is zero reason for wages to rise for those that bring no skills to the table.I'm saying wages should not remain stagnant for years at a time while profits go up.
And what have you done about it?Apparently nothing if you're a Republican.
Good point. No reason to link it to basketball player salaries or other unrelated professions either. Minimum wages should be high enough that a person can live on it without taxpayer funded programs - make corporations, not taxpayers, foot the bill for their own labor. It should also be indexed to inflation so that they don't fall behind.False equivalency, we have no economic or practical reason to link minimum wage to nebulous “Wall Street bonuses.”
When folks think that burger workers and waiters/waitresses should not be paid $17.50 per hour that is astounding considering $17.50 per hour @ 40 hours per week is only $33,000 per year which is not much money.
Mowing correctly and edging correctly then cleaning up is not a skill set? Try doing 40 yards a week per person. Then come back and tell those workers that is not a lot of work...... ignorance is bliss. Throw in some weeding the beds instead of using toxic chemicals. Add pruning the shrubs
to a customers expectation. Is this a lot more work? Yes this is worth $100,000 a year.
If whining was a skill youd be a CEO instead of a greeter at Walmart.Walmart and Amazon regularly pay OSHA fines rather than have safe working conditions. Being a human being willing to make them money ought to be worth more of a paycheck. The people working there now are being worked into overuse injuries on a regular basis and are dodging their responsibilities for having conditions that create those long term debilitating injuries. Further, once anyone has worked there a certain length of time, they aren't unskilled, they know the routines, they know the automation, how to handle unknown issues, etc etc.
Your problem is you don't have any ****ing respect for your fellow Americans doing crappy jobs for crappier pay so you can get whatever you need via retail.
People expect more pay because they can see how much product they are processing and how much money is being made that they help to process, without those people the business does not exist.
Had you said "around 2%" you would've had wiggle room but no... you said "less than 2%". Words matter. It's the difference between telling the truth and telling a lie and you opted for the latter as you too often do. You could man up and admit you were wrong but we both know that ain't gonna happen so you go ahead and double down on lying. It's the way of the trumpettes.You’re choking on 2% in 2021 versus 2.3% to 2.7% four years ago.
As do mine had you bothered to click on the link.My number comes from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.