• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Milwaukee County Judge Dugan indicted, grand jury meets Tuesday

MTAtech said:
The grand jury only hears the prosecution's side of the case. It's been said that a prosecutor can get the grand jury to indict a ham sandwich.
Click to expand...

Funny, Democrats don’t care about ham sandwiches when it’s Trump.
 
ClaraD said:
He was there for a court case. Question is why didn't they place a detainer before he made bail? That sounds like an error on their part...and they could have placed a detainer against him.
Click to expand...
They weren't aware he was in custody - or even in the country. There wasn't an active case against him when he was arrested, and given that it was a misdemeanor offense, he likely made bail relatively quickly. His fingerprints were entered as a part of the arrest - and flagged as having previously been removed, triggering ICE to issue the warrant for unlawful reentry.

And again - that's not relevant.
 
ClaraD said:
So, explain how it is different from not having one.
Click to expand...
One wasn’t even needed.
ClaraD said:
They still can arrest him without it, in any public space.
Click to expand...
I know. You seem confused as to the fact that an administrative warrant is a valid warrant. Despite being shown a citation showing they are valid, and YOU YOURSELF PROVIDING A CITATION SHOWING THEY ARE 😂
 
dcsports said:
They weren't aware he was in custody - or even in the country. There wasn't an active case against him when he was arrested, and given that it was a misdemeanor offense, he likely made bail relatively quickly. His fingerprints were entered as a part of the arrest - and flagged as having previously been removed, triggering ICE to issue the warrant for unlawful reentry.

And again - that's not relevant.
Click to expand...
They were aware...they simply failed to get a detainer in place...It doesn't matter that there isn't an active case...they have access to all of the databases of arrests and incarcerated individuals...my own son had a detainer placed against him even though he is a US citizen....explain how that happened and they couldn't ****ing get it together for this guy?
 
ClaraD said:
It doesn't matter that a judge isn't a police officer...they are in control of the courthouse and can ask anyone to leave.
Click to expand...
Nope. Only the courtroom.
 
ClaraD said:
no, she isn't...
Click to expand...
Objectively is.
ClaraD said:
she is on video telling him to leave through a door that leads into the same hallway the officers were in.
Click to expand...
She is on video assisting him in evading LEO by using an employee door. It’s why she isn’t a judge anymore and was indicted.
 
ClaraD said:
They were aware...they simply failed to get a detainer in place...It doesn't matter that there isn't an active case...they have access to all of the databases of arrests and incarcerated individuals...my own son had a detainer placed against him even though he is a US citizen....explain how that happened and they couldn't ****ing get it together for this guy?
Click to expand...
Already explained. And again, irrelevant.
 
This is what the Chief Justice Ashley said about Administrative warrants:

He said that an administrative warrant can be used to make arrests in a public hallway, but added that "a judicial warrant has more authority in going into private areas."

You were saying? Not looking good for Judge Dugan.

www.jsonline.com

On Hannah Dugan's arrest, Chief Judge says 'we're all concerned about how it transpired'

Milwaukee County Chief Judge Carl Ashley said, "We're all concerned" about Judge Dugan's arrest and questioned "whether that process was necessary."
www.jsonline.com
 
Last edited:
MTAtech said:
The grand jury only hears the prosecution's side of the case. It's been said that a prosecutor can get the grand jury to indict a ham sandwich.
Click to expand...
Of course. It’s a necessary step in the processing.
 
ClaraD said:
They were aware...they simply failed to get a detainer in place...It doesn't matter that there isn't an active case...they have access to all of the databases of arrests and incarcerated individuals...my own son had a detainer placed against him even though he is a US citizen....explain how that happened and they couldn't ****ing get it together for this guy?
Click to expand...
One can always tell when ClaraD knows she is failing, out come the personal “stories”

Which would not be such a bad thing if those “stories” didn’t so often turn out to be complete BS.
Like where she claimed to be well versed in firearms and claimed you couldn’t shoot 22lr out of a handgun. Even went so far as to claim there was a warning on the box of ammo not to do it.
Or how she played soccer until she was 17 on boys soccer teams yet claimed that physical contact between soccer players is against the rules.
 
braindrain said:
One can always tell when ClaraD knows she is failing, out come the personal “stories”

Which would not be such a bad thing if those “stories” didn’t so often turn out to be complete BS.
Like where she claimed to be well versed in firearms and claimed you couldn’t shoot 22lr out of a handgun. Even went so far as to claim there was a warning on the box of ammo not to do it.
Or how she played soccer until she was 17 on boys soccer teams yet claimed that physical contact between soccer players is against the rules.
Click to expand...

After we well established an administrative warrant is perfectly legal, as per my source from the Chief Judge himself, she faded to obscurity in this thread. Likewise, the Chief Judges reply likely invalidates @ClaraD claim the Chief Judge told law enforcement they have to leave the courthouse.
 
Last edited:
dcsports said:
An administrative warrant is a valid warrant.

The ICE policy and courthouse policy is to not disturb the hearing, and to make the arrest outside the courtroom after the hearing had completed.
Click to expand...
Post a link that supports your above claim.
 
Linuxcooldude said:
After we well established an administrative warrant is perfectly legal, as per my source from the Chief Judge himself, she faded to obscurity in this thread. Likewise, the Chief Judges reply likely invalidates @ClaraD claim the Chief Judge told law enforcement they have to leave the courthouse.
Click to expand...
The Chief Judge did not weigh-in on the validity of the administrative warrant. Only that ICE agents were permitted to make arrests in public areas inside the courthouse.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom