RaleBulgarian
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2018
- Messages
- 54,321
- Reaction score
- 41,683
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Dugan is still a judge.It’s one reason why she is a former judge …
Dugan is still a judge.It’s one reason why she is a former judge …
No she isn’t.Dugan is still a judge.
Reread your own post #817.We already did, post #817 from the Chief Judge Ashly himself.
No, she was stripped of her 'power' by the state supreme court. While she's probably technically 'on leave' pending the resolution of the criminal charges against her, it's highly unlikely she'll ever sit behind the bench again. She'll be lucky to keep her license.Dugan is still a judge.
Yes, she is.No she isn’t.
Backpedaling.No, she was stripped of her 'power' by the state supreme court. While she's probably technically 'on leave' pending the resolution of the criminal charges against her, it's highly unlikely she'll ever sit behind the bench again. She'll be lucky to keep her license.
OK, you are backpedaling. Take care.Backpedaling.
Where in the criminal complaint against Dugan does it say;Read the criminal complaint. The federal agents and chief judge/courthouse staff were in alignment on the process. It was the former judge that created an issue.
?… ICE policy … is to not disturb the hearing, and to make the arrest outside the courtroom after the hearing had completed.
Show a little bit of integrity by admitting that you were wrong when you claimed that Dugan is no longer a judge.OK, you are backpedaling. Take care.
Read it.
Now you are backpedaling. I added additional explanation. She's not a judge now, and is unlikely to ever be one again. Even if she bargains away the more serious charge, the poor judgement and ethical lapse is going to see her off the bench.Show a little bit of integrity by admitting that you were wrong when you claimed that Dugan is no longer a judge.
Reread your own post #817.
Chief Judge (not “Justice”) Ashley didn’t affirm the validity of the administrative warrant. Only that ICE agents, with administrative warrants (really, a warrant isn’t actually required) were permitted to make arrests in public areas within the courthouse.
That’s all.
She’s not a judge any longer.Yes, she is.
View attachment 67572007View attachment 67572008
Loading…
static.fox6now.com
“Temporarily prohibited from exercising the powers of a Circuit Court Judge in the state of Wisconsin” does not equate with “former judge”.
Yes, she is. She hasn’t been disbarredNo she isn’t.
No, we haven’t. An administrative warrant gives them no more authority than not having zero. They can make an arrest in a public area without oneYou guys already lost the Administrative warrant argument. Doubling down on it won’t help you now. Move on to another one. Likely it will be submitted into evidence at her trial.
No, he didn’t and said they hadn’t formalized a policy on ICEAnd the chief judge agreed that the administrative warrant was legal and that ICE could detain the illegal alien in the hallways (public areas) of the courthouse.
They somehow think it gives them more power than no warrant which is hilariousReread your own post #817.
Chief Judge (not “Justice”) Ashley didn’t affirm the validity of the administrative warrant. Only that ICE agents, with administrative warrants (really, a warrant isn’t actually required) were permitted to make arrests in public areas within the courthouse.
That’s all.
Dugan, irrefutably, is still a judge.She’s not a judge any longer.
No, we haven’t. An administrative warrant gives them no more authority than not having zero. They can make an arrest in a public area without one
I’m not “you guys”, and I haven’t made any argument regarding the ICE’s administrative warrant.You guys already lost the Administrative warrant argument. Doubling down on it won’t help you now. Move on to another one. Likely it will be submitted into evidence at her trial.
Its not a judicial warrantYou magically changed it from a Judicial warrant to no warrant…progress.
Stop embarrassing yourself with lies.Now you are backpedaling.
Blah, blah, …..I added additional explanation. She's not a judge now, and is unlikely to ever be one again. Even if she bargains away the more serious charge, the poor judgement and ethical lapse is going to see her off the bench.
Its not a judicial warrant
4th amendment.
Its not a second arrest warrant...they need a JUDICIAL WARRANT specifying the crime that the person is being arrested for and who is to be arrested.
I’m not “you guys”, and I haven’t made any argument regarding the ICE’s administrative warrant.
Twice now, you’ve falsely accused me of arguing about the administrative warrant.You and ClaraD are certainly are being disingenuous about the Administrative warrant. No surprise, after most of your arguments fell apart.