Yes, I have trained very carefully in order to use my 9mm in self-defense and I dont care HOW clear the threat or big an asshole....I will retreat every time if I can.
Case in point: Michael Dunn. Need another one? George Zimmerman. Doesnt matter that he got off....his life is ruined.
What? This makes no sense what so ever. There are alot of very sound reasons why someone would not want to be involved in an avoidable shooting.Far from it missy. And I don't give two ****s what your gun ownership resume is, the fact that your prevailing instinct is to retreat makes me wonder why you have one.
Far from it missy. And I don't give two ****s what your gun ownership resume is, the fact that your prevailing instinct is to retreat makes me wonder why you have one. But its your own business I guess. I'll keep watch to see where you line up on 2nd amendment issues in the future.
By the by, you seem awfully quick to lump me in with your caricature of Dunn without ever having met me. That points more to your looking silly that your irrational outburst here.
Good riddance to that nut case, that thug will probably die in prison making the streets a safer place.Michael Dunn found guilty of 1st-degree murder in loud-music trial
Michael Dunn found guilty of murder in loud-music trial - CNN.com
Sad day for him. He should have walked.
How many times do you need to be told?Based on the evidence a jury of 12 saw fit to end his life as he knew it. He has 3, 60 year sentences for attempted murder plus a life sentence no parole. You just keep on defending him though.
:dohJustice was served
You tell as many lies as you want but it doesn't change the truth that my arguments are based on the evidence which is not racist.and your argument still looks ignorant and racist,
Muhahahah!PS: I can't wait for the guy in Denver who shot blindly into his garage to get convicted. Then I can laugh at your lame brained justifications yet again.
His actions afterwards seemed like exactly something that some folks would do considering the circumstances. They do not impart any dishonesty to his actions though. That is only from suspicious minds, not rational ones.Why is it "logical" to accept Dunn's word for anything? His actions following the incident certainly don't make him seem trustworthy.
Lmao.
http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lr2qfvGsSe1qfk87to1_500.gif[IMG][/QUOTE]:doh
Look at that. More nonsense from you because you can not debate the evidence.
Justice was served
As for accepting? There is no evidence to show that is account is false. Nothing.
His actions afterwards seemed like exactly something that some folks would do considering the circumstances.
Can the idiotic hyperbole.In what alternate universe do YOU live? If you blew someone away, the first thing you'd do is drive to a motel and order a ****ing pizza?
Again showing you do not know the evidence.I think the fact that the deceased didn't have the weapon Dunn claimed he did is evidence that his account is false.
That is not how it works.There's no evidence to show that his account is true, either.
Can the idiotic hyperbole.
I see you haven't payed attention to the actual evidence.
He didn't know he blew anybody away.
He fled from the threat.
Only on the next morning did he learn of it.
Again showing you do not know the evidence.
That does not mean that a gun did not exist.
Nor does it mean that something that appeared to be a gun didn't exist. (Tripod leg being one such thing)
Davis friends left the scene by driving into an adjacent parking lot 400 feet away. They stop and got out. It was seen that they appeared to be looking for something in the vehicle and moving stuff around.
The driver instead of completing a call to 911, made two call in this paring lot to his aunt and his cousin, both who lived in the immediate area and who both came unto the scene in minutes.
The police didn't bother to search the area until several days later.
If Davis had a gun or something that appeared as such, they had more than ample opportunity to get rid of it and have it secreted away.
So it does leave the possibility that there was one.
That is not how it works.
The prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he committed the crime, which includes showing that what he says didn't happen by the evidence. There was no evidence showing his account not to be true.
:dohHere is how it works.
:naughtyOf course. that is what a reasonable person would do.
Nothing you said here counters what I stated.Now, in terms of them not finding a weapon. If there really was a weapon, the best chance in finding it was the day of the occurrence. His best chance at them finding the "weapon" was immediately after the incident. Now, whose fault was that? By fleeing the scene of the crime and not reporting in a reasonable manner the horrible danger her faced? Guess what ....his believability is in the crapper .
In what alternate universe do YOU live? If you blew someone away, the first thing you'd do is drive to a motel and order a ****ing pizza?
The facts and evidence proves you wrong in regards to what a sane person does.yep he is a nutcase that belongs in jail
no rational, sane person does what he does in his case AND ALSO LIES ABOUT IT lol
he is a loon and now in prison theres gona be some shots fired at him, the kind he wont like lol
1.)The facts and evidence proves you wrong in regards to what a sane person does.
2.)Nor has any lie been proven. So you are talking nonsense.
3.)nd you have no idea what will happen to him.
Can the idiotic hyperbole.
I see you haven't payed attention to the actual evidence.
He didn't know he blew anybody away.
He fled from the threat.
Only on the next morning did he learn of it.
:naughty
No, that is just one way a person may act.
What he did was also reasonable given the known circumstances, as already pointed out. Duh! :doh.
False. That was your opinion shown, and was shown to be absurdly false.1.) false, thats an assumption and your opinion. Not fact or evidence.The facts and evidence proves you wrong in regards to what a sane person does.
Your wrong opinion again2.) false, his lies were proven by the testimony of his girlfriend, phone records and the testimony of his neighbor.
???it is normal for a person to avoid going home, check into a hotel, order pizza and beer after unloading your weapon in a car full of people. So long as you don't know for sure that you killed someone.
:naughtyNo, it is pretty much the way any reasonable person would act.
It may have, but it shouldn't have given the circumstances.I will bet you the fact that he FLED the scene and did not report the serious incident weighed heavily on the minds of jurors. As it should have.
:lamo No it isn't, especially considering that he had no idea if the threat was going to return and fire at him. Under such circumstances it is best to flee.It was entirely unreasonable for an innocent man to flee the scene after he had discharged his weapon 10 times towards other human beings.
This is nothing more than conditioned cynical thoughts.It is entirely reasonable for a person wishing to evade criminal prosecution to flee the scene where he just discharged his weapon 10 times towards other human beings.
1.)False. That was your opinion shown, and was shown to be absurdly false.
He has never been shown not to be sane. Nor was any attempt made to have any Doctor declare the nonsense you spout.
Your wrong opinion again
His GF not remembering does not make what he said a lie. Never will.
And his thinking that he carried through with what he intended, because he spoke with the very person he intended to contact, does not make what he said a lie.
It just means he was mistaken.
???
1. There is no law that said he had to remain or report the incident.
2. He didn't know he killed the threat and was fleeing from that very threat. That is normal.
3. He ordered food for the GF. And deven if it was for him it isn't at all odd.
And the following clearly applies to you, the one who doesn't know the evidence. :doh
Your spin is absurd. Stop being so absurd and learn the evidence and quit replacing evidence with your absurd opinions and then trying to conflate the two.
:naughty
No, it is a way some people would act.
It is like you do not understand that everybody acts differently.
It may have, but it shouldn't have given the circumstances.
And if the the Juror from the first trial is an example of why this Jury found guilt, this has nothing to do with it.
:lamo No it isn't, especially considering that he had no idea if the threat was going to return and fire at him. Under such circumstances it is best to flee.
This is nothing more than conditioned cynical thoughts.
It is more likely he fled for the reason he stated he did.
What an absurdly dishonest response.1.) you just proved there was no facts or evidence declaring him to be sane or not sane proving me right and your statement wrong. I said I thought he was insane, you claimed FACTS and EVIDENCE prove otherwise thats false, thanks for proving me right.
Wrong J. Nothing showed he lied.2.) good thing no one talked about her not remembering, please stick to what was said, making stuff up wont change the facts. Two peoples testimonies and phones records showed he lied. This fact will never change. Until you produce facts that prove otherwise you have nothing and there will be no response. Its a fact he lied, this was proven in court.
At the threat.shot 10 rounds into a car filled with people,
How lonh did it take to get to his hotel?and drove 2 hours to his lodging, ordered pizza and a movie.
The homeless man took down Dunn's license plate number as Dunn escaped the murder scene and gave it to the store clerk.And yet, he claims that his life was threatened, shot 10 rounds into a car filled with people, and drove 2 hours to his lodging, ordered pizza and a movie.
How again did the police track him down?
How again did the police track him down?
So you'd rather start shooting than extricate yourself from the situation if at all possible? Otherwise, why have a gun, right?
The homeless man took down Dunn's license plate number as Dunn escaped the murder scene and gave it to the store clerk.
Had he not done so Dunn would likely still be on the run and we would never know who murdered Jordan Davis and who attempted to murder his three friends because their music was too loud..
Dunn was obviously on the run and showed no intention of ever reporting the murder to the police.
The racist murderer Dunn would have gone free.
I don't know if the man (Dunn) was racist or not, neither do you....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?