An extensive analysis of both helicopters concluded a refurbished Chinook would cost about 40 percent more overall to buy and maintain than the Russian helicopter, the senior defense official said.
That is hard to fathom.
Boeing executives informed congressional staff during a meeting held in late September that the cost of a refurbished CH-47D would be in the $12 million to $14 million range, according to a person knowledgeable about the discussion but not authorized to be identified as the source of the information.
1) The Afghans are use to Soviet tech.
2) Russian tech is Soviet tech.
3) Russian tech is cheaper than American tech.
4) The report seems to be bull**** made by Boeing.
5) Repairing Russian tech is easier than American tech.. and cheaper.
Saying that, I agree that US money should be use don US companies and jobs.. problem is that it would most likely cost the US tax payer much more due to the corruption in the US military.
In a rare move I'm going to agree with everything you said, because I happen to know something about this. What you're saying is precisely why they are getting this aircraft, and this is not news exactly.1) The Afghans are use to Soviet tech.
2) Russian tech is Soviet tech.
3) Russian tech is cheaper than American tech.
4) The report seems to be bull**** made by Boeing.
5) Repairing Russian tech is easier than American tech.. and cheaper.
Saying that, I agree that US money should be use don US companies and jobs.. problem is that it would most likely cost the US tax payer much more due to the corruption in the US military.
Mi-17 Helicopter Sale: Mi-17 Helicopters Bought by US from Russia
Mi-17 Helicopter Sale: Mi-17 Helicopters Bought by US from Russia, Draws Criticism
Mi-17 helicopter units are being sold by Russia to the United States in a move that has drawn criticism. The M-17 helicopters will be deployed to the Afghan army.
WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. military officials insisted a top-secret Pentagon study proved the need to buy Russian helicopters for Afghanistan’s security forces. But the study actually recommended an American-made rotorcraft, according to unclassified excerpts obtained by The Associated Press.
The excerpts show the U.S. Army’s workhorse Chinook, built by Boeing Co. in Pennsylvania, was “the most cost-effective single platform type fleet for the Afghan Air Force over a 20-year” period.
The finding has triggered allegations the Defense Department misled members of Congress and improperly cut U.S. companies out of competing for a contract that has swelled to more than $1 billion.
More than two years since DOD announced it was acquiring Russian Mi-17 helicopters, a veil of secrecy still obscures the pact despite its high-dollar value, the potential for fraud and waste, and accusations the Pentagon muffled important information.
- - - - -
USA buying Russian helicopters. Whatjathink?
I think it sucks. The cost isn't JUST the dollar costs, but where those dollars go. If American made, those dollars go here. If not, they go elsewhere. Paying unemployment and welfare to American workers while have Russia build systems we pay for? That's NUTS by every measure.
The thing is prolly bugged with all kinds of shut down viruses.
Remember when America sold weapons to Saddam and what those weapons did when we invaded them?
I posted complaining about this some time ago http://www.debatepolitics.com/gener...russian-we-dont-make-helicopters-america.html
...and there were some pretty good responses there FYI.
A lot of good answers and I do see some explanation for this. Better product, better price. But I still wonder why this should be so. We spend a fortune on our military. Something like 700 billion and that's probably not everything since they have lots of hidden classified stuff in the background.
Someone objected to bloating defense contractors. Sure, who loves them? They have enriched themselves beyond measure. But aren't we just bloating a Russian defense manufacturer?
Instead of giving away deals and freebies only to the very rich and very poor, wouldn't this have created jobs and kept those dollars circulating in America? Why do they buy $3000 toilet seats and then suddenly decide the Russians offer a better price? So what if our helicopters suck? They'll probably be used to fight us 10 years from now anyway. At least we would control the parts supply.
When I was in Thailand in 1967, I wrote to Lyndon Johnson complaining (very politely) about the same problem. Staff cars made in Germany. Generators made in Czechoslovakia (sp?). Hammers from China? Assistant Managers (for the contractor I worked for) from the Philippines. They had a justification for every point I addressed. The cutes one was if we hired Filipinos, they would go back to the Philippines and buy lots of American products there. Huh? As thanks for my interest, the State Department called my employer (Philco-Ford) and asked them to fire me. I threatened to sue (I had a one year contract) and they backed off. But the point is that they really like to buy foreign and they don't want to hear no stinkin' complaining. Hasn't changed much in 47 years.
So, while I now understad the rationale, I don't agree with the procedure. Someone brought up the Glock as an example of so what. Good point. We can't make an American gun effective enough to supply ourselves. That's ridiculous! The only country where everybody can buy a gun - a huge market - a huge military - and we can't come up with a decent gun? What's wrong with us?
What are you talking about?
The thing is prolly bugged with all kinds of shut down viruses.
Remember when America sold weapons to Saddam and what those weapons did when we invaded them?
I have no problem with this. If we were buying Russian equipment for our own use I would but to supply a foreign army it makes to give them cheaper (to buy and maintain) equipment.
We don't want our future enemy to have gunships that are equal to ours.
Mi-17 Helicopter Sale: Mi-17 Helicopters Bought by US from Russia
Mi-17 Helicopter Sale: Mi-17 Helicopters Bought by US from Russia, Draws Criticism
Mi-17 helicopter units are being sold by Russia to the United States in a move that has drawn criticism. The M-17 helicopters will be deployed to the Afghan army.
WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. military officials insisted a top-secret Pentagon study proved the need to buy Russian helicopters for Afghanistan’s security forces. But the study actually recommended an American-made rotorcraft, according to unclassified excerpts obtained by The Associated Press.
The excerpts show the U.S. Army’s workhorse Chinook, built by Boeing Co. in Pennsylvania, was “the most cost-effective single platform type fleet for the Afghan Air Force over a 20-year” period.
The finding has triggered allegations the Defense Department misled members of Congress and improperly cut U.S. companies out of competing for a contract that has swelled to more than $1 billion.
More than two years since DOD announced it was acquiring Russian Mi-17 helicopters, a veil of secrecy still obscures the pact despite its high-dollar value, the potential for fraud and waste, and accusations the Pentagon muffled important information.
- - - - -
USA buying Russian helicopters. Whatjathink?
I think it sucks. The cost isn't JUST the dollar costs, but where those dollars go. If American made, those dollars go here. If not, they go elsewhere. Paying unemployment and welfare to American workers while have Russia build systems we pay for? That's NUTS by every measure.
Yeah, I was about to say, but you beat me to it. There's far more expense associated with the proper maintenance of aircraft and proper training of crew that this decision makes sense for the Afghans. Of course, rather than the US military buying those aircraft and giving them to the Afghans, why not give the Afghans the money and let them buy them themselves? Or is that what's going on here?
Afghanistan grows enough opium poppies to pay for their own helicopters.
Afghanistan grows enough opium poppies to pay for their own helicopters.
They are not gunships, they are transport helicopters.
" It is a medium twin-turbine transport helicopter that can also act as a gunship.
The Afghans don't have the expertise to maintain them so they get training, and probably helping them setup a proper maintenance system. Before we showed up they were keeping them together with bubblegum and chicken wire. Our pilots didn't even want to get in those death traps.
And those gunships aren't as good as ours.
This topic was brought up a couple nights ago on another thread on the DP military forum.
We all know why the Afghan's will be flying Russian copters than American made copters. The same reason why we are arming the Afghan army with AK-47 instead of M-16's.
The Afghans aren't capable of maintaining either the American CH-46 or M-16.
And it's very probable all of the Afghan army weapons will be in the hands of the Taliban within a decade anyways.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?