You signed yourself over to an ideology that is totally at odds with our Constitution and the basic principles of our founding, which is why you have to resort to intellectual dishonesty and character assassination in order to twist and distort any dialog you take part in...
Let's discuss intellectual dishonesty, character assassination, the twisting and distortion of dialog, and childish insults, shall we? Oh, and let's not forget this
pot calling the kettle black theme you've got going...
Yes, liberals are intolerant. Us adults understand it quite well.
Perhaps if your criticisms we substance-based, we'd be less inclined to point out your childish hatred of opposing viewpoints.
K-thx!!!
"Liberals are intolerant" = intellectual dishonesty, character assassination, pot/kettle
"Us adults understand it" = childish insults
"your hatred of opposing viewpoints" = twisting and distortion of dialog, pot/kettle
Anyone who identifies with contemporary liberalism is intolerant by definition. I don't know any Democrats who self-identify as "liberal", anyway; the people who do assume that designation are mostly partisan Obamaphiles who hijacked the label from JFK
"contemporary liberals are intolerant by definition" = intellectual dishonesty, character assassination, pot/kettle
"partisan Obamaphiles" = childish insults
The group of shrill morons who have been acting childishly and idiotically since the moment George Bush was elected President.
"shrill morons" = character assassination, childish insults, twisting and distortion of dialog
"acting childishly and idiotically" = intellectual dishonesty, twisting and distortion of dialog
"liberals" who frequent internet forums are disconnected from America; they live in a self-imposed bubble of elitism and intolerance.
"disconnected from America" = intellectual dishonesty, character assassination
"self-imposed bubble of elitism and intolerance" = intellectual dishonesty, character assassination, childish insults, pot/kettle
"liberals" are either confused (they have the wrong label) or intolerant (internet liberals, hardliner leftist academics, media whores, government cronies, etc.).
"confused" = intellectual dishonesty, character assassination, childish insults
"intolerant" = intellectual dishonesty, character assassination, childish insults, pot/kettle
That people who self-identify with contemporary liberalism are intolerant, i.e., they are derisive and dismissive of opposing viewpoints.
"intolerant" = intellectual dishonesty, character assassination, childish insults, pot/kettle
"derisive and dismissive of opposing viewpoints" = intellectual dishonesty, character assassination, childish insults, pot/kettle
contemporary liberalism - they are a conformist group of ideologues who follow the Democratic elites and academic leftists lockstep. I think their intolerance stems from their ideological rigidity, which necessitates intellectual contradictions and hypocrisy, which further necessitates character assassination and childish insults as a substitute for substance-based criticisms.
"conformist" = intellectual dishonesty, character assassination, childish insults, pot/kettle
"ideologues" = intellectual dishonesty, character assassination, childish insults, pot/kettle
"follow the Democratic elites and academic leftists lockstep" = intellectual dishonesty, character assassination, childish insults, pot/kettle
intolerance" = intellectual dishonesty, character assassination, childish insults, pot/kettle
"ideological rigidity" = intellectual dishonesty, character assassination, childish insults, pot/kettle
"intellectual contradictions and hypocrisy" = intellectual dishonesty, character assassination, childish insults, pot/kettle
"character assassination and childish insults as a substitute for substance-based criticisms" = intellectual dishonesty, character assassination, childish insults, twisting and distortion of dialog,
pot/kettle
Quasi-Marxist statism and coercive populism as espoused by Democratic elites, leftist academics, media whores, and liberal ideologues who roam the internet and blogosphere.
"Quasi-Marxist statism" = intellectual dishonesty, twisting and distortion of dialog
"coercive populism" = intellectual dishonesty, twisting and distortion of dialog
"elites" = intellectual dishonesty, twisting and distortion of dialog,
pot/kettle
Perhaps if your criticisms were substance-based, we'd be less inclined to point out your childish hatred of opposing viewpoints. :roll: