'Melania's ready to risk it all': first lady's Trudeau encounter delights internet (1 Viewer)

[j-mac]

for you to ask why is sad but since it seems to exceed your capabilities I'll explain it as slowly and clearly as I can

Anthony60 posted " wah wah nobody did this to President Obama"
Vern simply looked for a thread where they did exactly that
you obediently started such a thread

Your thread proved A60's post was false so you clearly don't understand what "troll" means . Your post however is an excellent example of "snowflakery".

I had nothing to do with this thread, and still don't other than to ask you this particular question...I am however glad to see that I get under your skin so....I can't control what triggers you, nor can I stop liberals today from being the way they are....if you have a problem in the future with what I post, you can either address in the thread it was posted, report it, or pm me to discuss it, but posting an unrelated post, in a thread to bait me will from this point on be ignored, or reported. Regardless of whatever dumbass point you think your making.



Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

 

[JustHanging]

Mind you, Bob Stanfield DID catch the football quite successfully eight or nine times before the media got the picture of him fumbling it that made all the front pages.

I remember that. He had good Canadian values imo.

Robert Standfield: "Increasing the size of the GNP is important, but it is not in itself a sufficient goal for a civilized society."

 

[ocean515]

From The Guardian

'Melania's ready to risk it all': first lady's Trudeau encounter delights internet
​

A photograph from the weekend G7 summit in France of Melania Trump greeting Canada’s prime minister, Justin Trudeau, has gone viral, with online commenters joking about the encounter.

A series of photographs, taken by a European Pressphoto Agency photographer as world leaders and their spouses came together on Sunday evening for a “family photo” to conclude the summit, show a smiling first lady greeting Trudeau.

The apparent warmth of the scene, not out of place in a diplomatic setting of its kind, nevertheless captured the imaginations of many.

COMMENT:-

The obvious love and affection shown between "Individual 1" and "Wife 3" should warm the cockles of the hearts of all true believers in the sanctity of marriage.
​

On the intellectually vacant are able to be triggered by fractions of a second caught on film.

 

[JustHanging]

On the intellectually vacant are able to be triggered by fractions of a second caught on film.

It's the juxtaposition between how happy Melania looks, and how pissed off Trump looks that makes it humourous. Jesus, savour life. People don't need to be afraid all the time, no matter what Trump tells them.

 

[ocean515]

It's the juxtaposition between how happy Melania looks, and how pissed off Trump looks that makes it humourous. Jesus, savour life. People don't need to be afraid all the time, no matter what Trump tells them.

That is not the claim made in the OP. Perhaps you could try to address that, rather than just invent something out of the clear air.

 

[TU Curmudgeon]

I remember that. He had good Canadian values imo.

Robert Standfield: "Increasing the size of the GNP is important, but it is not in itself a sufficient goal for a civilized society."

Obviously a <SARC>"Socialist" (if not an outright "Communist") since everyone knows that increasing profits - which is the natural outcome of increasing GNP - is the ultimate goal of all patriotic, real, patriotic, true, patriotic, conservative, patriotic, Christian patriotic, White, patriotic, __[fill in the blank]__, patriotic, societies of patriots</SARC> - right?

 

[TU Curmudgeon]

On the intellectually vacant are able to be triggered by fractions of a second caught on film.

I didn't know that "having a sense of humour" and "intellectually vacant" meant the same thing.

I found the contrast between the facial expressions of "Individual 1" and "Wife 3" amusing, obviously you didn't?

 

[JustHanging]

That is not the claim made in the OP. Perhaps you could try to address that, rather than just invent something out of the clear air.

What are you babbling about? Your post makes no sense.

I was commenting on the humour of the juxtaposition between the happiness of Melania, and the anger of Donald. Jesus, you can take a break from defending Trump for one minute, it won't kill you. Savour life, it's really amazing.

 

[ocean515]

I didn't know that "having a sense of humour" and "intellectually vacant" meant the same thing.

I found the contrast between the facial expressions of "Individual 1" and "Wife 3" amusing, obviously you didn't?

No, that's a lie.

You found it a signal of infidelity, and thus included a comment about the "sanctity of marriage" in your OP.

 

[ocean515]

What are you babbling about? Your post makes no sense.

I was commenting on the humour of the juxtaposition between the happiness of Melania, and the anger of Donald. Jesus, you can take a break from defending Trump for one minute, it won't kill you. Savour life, it's really amazing.

Geeze, what do you think the OP was saying when it mentioned "the sanctity of marriage" in the OP?

And given your never ending jonesing on anything Trump, you might consider taking your own advice.

 

[TU Curmudgeon]

That is not the claim made in the OP. Perhaps you could try to address that, rather than just invent something out of the clear air.

Let's look at that statement. The "claims" made in the OP were:

1. "A photograph from the weekend G7 summit in France of Melania Trump greeting Canada’s prime minister, Justin Trudeau, has gone viral, ..." - which was true;
2. "... with online commenters joking about the encounter." - which was true;
3. "A series of photographs, taken by a European Pressphoto Agency photographer as world leaders and their spouses came together on Sunday evening for a “family photo” to conclude the summit, show a smiling first lady greeting Trudeau." - which was true;
4. "The apparent warmth of the scene, ..." - which was true;
5. '... not out of place in a diplomatic setting of its kind, ..." - which was true;
6. "... nevertheless captured the imaginations of many." - which was true; and
7. "The obvious love and affection shown between "Individual 1" and "Wife 3" ..." - the love and affection between "Individual 1" and "Wife 3" WAS obvious;

Not only that, but knowing that people who display such an obvious level of love and affection between themselves continue to honour their marriage vows "'til death do us part" (and not fall into the Godless trap of left-wing, socialist, liberal, pinko, commie, atheistic, sinful, God banned, so-called "divorce") SHOULD "warm the cockles of the hearts of all true believers in the sanctity of marriage." - shouldn't it?

 

[TU Curmudgeon]

No, that's a lie.

Amazing, you actually have a fully developed telepathic facility.

You found it a signal of infidelity, ...

WOW!!! You know what I am thinking better than I do.

...and thus included a comment about the "sanctity of marriage" in your OP.

I thought that it was appropriate, but if you consider that it is inappropriate to mention "Individual 1", "Wife 3" and "sanctity of marriage" at the same time, I apologize for offending your sensitivities.

 

[ocean515]

Let's look at that statement. The "claims" made in the OP were:

1. "A photograph from the weekend G7 summit in France of Melania Trump greeting Canada’s prime minister, Justin Trudeau, has gone viral, ..." - which was true;
2. "... with online commenters joking about the encounter." - which was true;
3. "A series of photographs, taken by a European Pressphoto Agency photographer as world leaders and their spouses came together on Sunday evening for a “family photo” to conclude the summit, show a smiling first lady greeting Trudeau." - which was true;
4. "The apparent warmth of the scene, ..." - which was true;
5. '... not out of place in a diplomatic setting of its kind, ..." - which was true;
6. "... nevertheless captured the imaginations of many." - which was true; and
7. "The obvious love and affection shown between "Individual 1" and "Wife 3" ..." - the love and affection between "Individual 1" and "Wife 3" WAS obvious;

Not only that, but knowing that people who display such an obvious level of love and affection between themselves continue to honour their marriage vows "'til death do us part" (and not fall into the Godless trap of left-wing, socialist, liberal, pinko, commie, atheistic, sinful, God banned, so-called "divorce") SHOULD "warm the cockles of the hearts of all true believers in the sanctity of marriage." - shouldn't it?

An instant in time triggers the intellectually vacant to fill the needs of their confirmation bias, and fabricate more propaganda to keep them mesmerized.

 

[ocean515]

Amazing, you actually have a fully developed telepathic facility.



WOW!!! You know what I am thinking better than I do.



I thought that it was appropriate, but if you consider that it is inappropriate to mention "Individual 1", "Wife 3" and "sanctity of marriage" at the same time, I apologize for offending your sensitivities.

So, you can't deny the obsession, and how it demands your conclusions...…………..

 

[TU Curmudgeon]

So, you can't deny the obsession, and how it demands your conclusions...…………..

Interesting conclusions to be reached on no evidence other than your own thoughts.

 

[Carleen]

shrug...

Won't get Justin re-elected, but at least he may go out with a pleasant fantasy.

To any woman he is certainly eye candy. It has nothing to do with re-election.

 

[Mycroft]

To any woman he is certainly eye candy. It has nothing to do with re-election.

LOL!!

Admit it...you just like his sparkle socks.

 

[Carleen]

LOL!!

Admit it...you just like his sparkle socks.

Nope, his eyes and his smile. He’s a hottie.

 

[Anthony60]

well you'd be wrong

The one jmac posted was out of context. The video proved it.

LOL! Oh, is jmac reporting for the Guardian? CNN? You must be kidding. Funny.

 

[Anthony60]

Okay

Photo of Obama in Muslim garb shows deep ties to faith, O'''Reilly says | Fox News

Barack Obama, 'Muslim' president | Islam | The Guardian

Burgergate

That's literally just typing FOX News bitches about Obama.

Lol, your post is a joke.



Sent from the Matrioshka in the WH Christmas tree.

That's a total joke. I see O'Reilly making his opinion with facts to back it up. Where is the support for the report saying "Melania ready to risk it all" for this guy?

 

[ocean515]

Interesting conclusions to be reached on no evidence other than your own thoughts.

The evidence is in your own words.

:2wave:

 

[Lovebug]

in other love affairs

 

[Hatuey]

That's a total joke. I see O'Reilly making his opinion with facts to back it up. Where is the support for the report saying "Melania ready to risk it all" for this guy?

Was Obama a secret Muslim and these pictures prove it?

Lol, your posts are deranged.

Sent from the Matrioshka in the WH Christmas tree.

 

[Vern]

LOL! Oh, is jmac reporting for the Guardian? CNN? You must be kidding. Funny.

oh A60, its pretty funny you don't understand what I posted. Sure its typical but still funny. let me type this slowly. You whined "wah wah they never did that to Obama". I posted a thread started by jmac that shows they did exactly that. Hatuey posted some other examples.

Now A, the reason your brain "tricked" you into not understanding my clear point is that you posted something false. As a conservative, you don't have the integrity to admit you were wrong so your brain "misparaphrases" my post so you don't have deal with reality.

 

[Vern]

I had nothing to do with this thread, and still don't other than to ask you this particular question...I am however glad to see that I get under your skin so....I can't control what triggers you, nor can I stop liberals today from being the way they are....if you have a problem in the future with what I post, you can either address in the thread it was posted, report it, or pm me to discuss it, but posting an unrelated post, in a thread to bait me will from this point on be ignored, or reported. Regardless of whatever dumbass point you think your making.

wah wah wah. My explanation of why I quoted you in this thread was quite clear. Your snowflakery is also quite clear. And I have to chuckle, you are the one whining and threatening to report me so I just don't understand how you think you got under my skin or triggered me. But lets face it, conservatives have never let reality get in the way of their posts.