• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Man Finds Family Living In His Miami Home


That's just one brand.

Didn't you know? You've got a lot of prominent subsidiaries, too.

We're sidetracking. I'd be more than happy to debate this further in its own thread.
 

Libertarians can be defined simply, "Stay out of my life, and I'll stay out of yours." It's when qualifiers get thrown in that you have the different labels thrown in. To be fair though, Democrats and Republicans have just as many factions inside their own parties.. it's just they get drowned out as their is a clear hierarchy.
 
That's just one brand.

Didn't you know? You've got a lot of prominent subsidiaries, too.

We're sidetracking. I'd be more than happy to debate this further in its own thread.

I know of no libertarian, who believes in............. government control.

there are those who believe in limited and no government.
 

Yeah, but the factions within the republicrat party aren't polar opposites of each other.

The issue you have is the NAP. Or, more to the point, the interpretation of it, and the level to which it is adhered to.
 
I know of no libertarian, who believes in............. government control.

there are those who believe in limited and no government.

Your fellow libertarian, Hamster Budha, does. Maybe ask him about it? You seem uninformed.
 
Yeah, but the factions within the republicrat party aren't polar opposites of each other.

The issue you have is the NAP. Or, more to the point, the interpretation of it, and the level to which it is adhered to.

Oh contrair, I think there are some segments of the party that have a big issue with the Neocons.
 

It's a ****ty situation for all involved. Be willing to bet the guy and his family don't have anywhere to go nor any money to rent somewhere else.
 
Your fellow libertarian, Hamster Budha, does. Maybe ask him about it? You seem uninformed.

I know of no libertarian, who believes in............. government control.

there are those who believe in limited and no government.

Here's the thing, I think for a party to be successful, it has to know where to draw the line between it's beliefs, and what the people will stomach. Everyone knows Obama wants a single-payer healthcare system, but he knew pushing for something like that would be political suicide. So, he compromised.

That's where the Libertarian party has fallen short. They don't know how to compromise.
 

I agree..
I would have called the police and made the renter come up with the documentation for the police to pursue the man with the cash. But the renters would be packing up and moving to a hotel, motel or friends.
 
I agree..
I would have called the police and made the renter come up with the documentation for the police to pursue the man with the cash. But the renters would be packing up and moving to a hotel, motel or friends.

Again - not that easy. If they truly have documentation, they can't just be tossed. Rules are set in place to protect renters, even if they are there as a result of fraud.
 

KevinKohler likes to make things up as he goes, i see nothing from you which indicates, you believe in government control.

libertarians are not going to compromise on ......liberty.
 
Oh contrair, I think there are some segments of the party that have a big issue with the Neocons.

One side of libertarian believes in 0 property ownership.

That's about as polar as is logically possible.
 

Because that would be...anti libertarian?




I kid.


I agree 100%.
 
KevinKohler likes to make things up as he goes, i see nothing from you which indicates, you believe in government control.

libertarians are not going to compromise on ......liberty.

Personal attacks are traditionally a solid sign of a weak or failing argument.

I never said HE doesn't personally believe in government control...but he knows of factions within your amalgamated party that does.
 
Again - not that easy. If they truly have documentation, they can't just be tossed. Rules are set in place to protect renters, even if they are there as a result of fraud.

Okay I see your point...

What about the first renter, that was gone for two days and these rules set in place to protect renters?
He gets tossed out without his belongings?

Messy situation, fur sure
 
Personal attacks are traditionally a solid sign of a weak or failing argument.

I never said HE doesn't personally believe in government control...but he knows of factions within your amalgamated party that does.


personal attack?............its a good thing I didn't say boo to you.....

POST #28
I know of no libertarian, who believes in............. government control.

there are those who believe in limited and no government.

POST#30
Your fellow libertarian, Hamster Budha, does. Maybe ask him about it? You seem uninformed.

again I know of no libertarians who believe in .....government control.... Communism.
 
Last edited:
personal attack?............its a good thing I didn't say boo to you.....

POST #28


POST#30


again I know of no libertarians who believe in .....government control.... Communism.
You accused me of being a liar, which is what "making things up as I go" is.

Hamster Buddha is aware of libertarians who believe in government control. Or google it yourself, if you're so interested, which you seem to be.
 
You accused me of being a liar, which is what "making things up as I go" is.

Hamster Buddha is aware of libertarians who believe in government control. Or google it yourself, if you're so interested, which you seem to be.

liar?........I stated you make things up as you go along, after being told your ideas of libertarianism are wrong..

you stated ..the police were force under libertarianism....that is false police secure rights of the public by force...

Libertarianism in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Libertarianism in the United States is a movement promoting individual liberty and minimized government.[1][2] The Libertarian Party, asserts the following to be core beliefs of libertarianism:

Libertarians support maximum liberty in both personal and economic matters. They advocate a much smaller government; one that is limited to protecting individuals from coercion and violence. Libertarians tend to embrace individual responsibility, oppose government bureaucracy and taxes, promote private charity, tolerate diverse lifestyles, support the free market, and defend civil liberties.[3][4]

The U.S. Libertarian Party promotes individual sovereignty and seeks an end to coercion, advocating a government that is limited to protecting individuals from the initiation of force.[3] In the United States, people commonly associate the term libertarian with those who have "economically conservative" and "socially liberal" political views (using the common meanings of "conservative" and "liberal" in the United States

https://www.theihs.org/what-libertarian

your links seek to demonize libertarians [by the left] because they oppose force, income tax, , and are for property rights.

the Bloomberg link speaks negatively- of people who are in the republican party or is a libertarian.
 
Moderator's Warning:
this threads topic is not libertarianism. Cease the derail
 
It increases the cost of doing business. If your employee gets hurt doing something you pay them to do, and you can't afford to do the right thing, which is take care of that person...you can't afford to be in business.

You serious believe that ****? Benefits need to be limited to getting care for a while. This guys stayed on benefits even after it was no longer necessary. The German system was perfect for malingerers.
 
You serious believe that ****? Benefits need to be limited to getting care for a while. This guys stayed on benefits even after it was no longer necessary. The German system was perfect for malingerers.

The German system isn't what I was referencing, though. I'm fairly clueless about it. I am posting with regards to workmans comp, which takes a Drs word on how long benefits should be paid, up to the point of long term disability.

My only point is, it is, and SHOULD be, an employers responsibility, to care for health concerns of an employee that arises as a result of the job the employee is assigned to do by said employer.

You have an employee break their leg on the job, barring monkey business, those medical bills are yours, as is compensation to cover the employee for time spent being unable to work. Can't afford that, then can't afford to be in business.
 
Meh, I'd evict them but I'd give them the full notice necessary for eviction. I wouldn't kick a toddler out on the street simply because his parents are idiots. I have a soul.
 
The owner is going to say that because it's easier to sell the house and possibly escape foreclosure if the house is producing an income.

Trust your fears, not his words.
 

Three days? No, they have to have mail sent to them there. Once they have that, they can prove residence.

Either way, are you guys serious? Like, that's an actual thing? WTF?
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…