• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Man claims to have seen the afterlife (1 Viewer)

That's like saying a psychiatrist would need to have bipolar disorder to know the difference between a manic and depressive episode
Right, but a psychiatrist spent 4-6 years in University studying the topic.
I suspect you never studied NDE's for any length of time, which means you're arguing from a position of ignorance
 
Biological death is brain death. The heart stopping (asystole/PEA) is clinical death. Successful resuscitation via CPR or ACLS can reverse clinical death. But brain death is irreversible and is the point of Biological death. Defibrillators are only used on pulseless ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation rhythms to stop the arrhythmia.
You missed the point.
 
Right, but a psychiatrist spent 4-6 years in University studying the topic.
Yes and do they affirm the things one "sees" in an NDE as being actually real as opposed to a hallucination or dreams?
I suspect you never studied NDE's for any length of time, which means you're arguing from a position of ignorance
Since you dont know anything about me or my level of education, you're hardly in a position to comment on it.
 
You can induce NDE's without medicine. Its called astral projection.
Buddhist munks are really good at it

This isnt my field of expertise so im not just gonna knock it. As far as it being proof of an afterlife i remain skeptical though as that would require a soul which is not something i think we have. I think dreams make us think we are astral projecting and it can feel very real just like dreams can feel very real (though mine are usually really disjointed hoo boy).

A typical dream for me is disjointed parts of my life with added fantastical feats.
 
I can comment on your level of education regarding NDE's, and its clear you are highly uneducated
Im not the one claiming NDEs are more than they are or ignoring rational explanations for them.
The average psychiatrist doesnt study NDE's, so they would know nothing about it, just as you know nothing about it
But you're an expert because you "experienced" it, right? Never mind that "experience" is subjective and the weakest form of evidence with the strongest bias. 🙄
Nothing wrong with being skeptical
Which is why everything should be questioned, even experience.
 
Im not the one claiming NDEs are more than they are or ignoring rational explanations for them.

But you're an expert because you "experienced" it, right? Never mind that "experience" is subjective and the weakest form of evidence with the strongest bias. 🙄
There are millions of people who have experienced the same.
Thats pretty powerful evidence
 
You're not questioning it though, you're discounting it based on zero research
There's no research to support it. I question the claims made without supporting evidence to affirm them. Otherwise, it's little more than one's feelings.
There are millions of people who have experienced the same.
Thats pretty powerful evidence
Nope. Thats an argumentum ad populum fallacy. It's still subjective and anecdotal. The weakest form of "evidence."
 
There's no research to support it
And this is why your opinion cannot be taken seriously. There is tons of research done on NDE's.
There's even a special research centre devoted to studying the phenomenon:


And here are some of the peer-reviewed research papers:












Now, before we continue this debate. Will you admit you were wrong when you said there's "no research to support it"??
Because if you cannot admit you were wrong, then I'm done debating with you
 
And this is why your opinion cannot be taken seriously. There is tons of research done on NDE's.
There's even a special research centre devoted to studying the phenomenon:


And here are some of the peer-reviewed research papers:












Now, before we continue this debate. Will you admit you were wrong when you said there's "no research to support it"??
Because if you cannot admit you were wrong, then I'm done debating with you
Perhaps you should understand what I am saying: there is nothing to support NDEs being real. If someone claims to have a NDE and saw angels, heaven, or whatever, there's nothing to support such assertions or that the objects of an NDE are actually real. I have said NDEs have rational explanations for their cause and that such visions/hallucinations seem real. The proverbial mind playing tricks on you.
 
Perhaps you should understand what I am saying: there is nothing to support NDEs being real. If someone claims to have a NDE and saw angels, heaven, or whatever, there's nothing to support such assertions or that the objects of an NDE are actually real. I have said NDEs have rational explanations for their cause and that such visions/hallucinations seem real. The proverbial mind playing tricks on you.
No, you said there was no research done on the topic, which is completely false.
Not that I expected you to admit you were wrong though, so thanks for not letting me down
 
No, you said there was no research done on the topic, which is completely false.
Not that I expected you to admit you were wrong though, so thanks for not letting me down
Clearly you don't comprehend what I was saying or ate just being obtuse about it. I've already explained ad nauseum at this point and now you're grasping.
 
LOL......when it comes to this subject you have no idea what you're talking about 😂
Like the one who had what amounts to an hallucination on a medication induced drug trip dhring brain hypoxia. Too funny indeed.
 
Moving right along, here are some more interesting studies on NDE's









 
You seem so certain, You must have facts and evidence to based your absolute claims on. Otherwise you're just countering his religion with your own religion. Neither based on evidence or fact, just competing versions of faith.
If you had any real evidence of an afterlife you would be very famous. But you are not famous.
 
NOBODY ever died, (as in brain dead) and came back to talk about it. It's called NEAR death experience for a reason.
Indeed. And some seem to think whatever they saw in that experience were actually real. Yet there remains no evidence to substantiate them. Just claims of seeing or hearing things. Just like when one sees aliens, UFOs, Elvis and such as you pointed out.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom