- Joined
- Oct 4, 2011
- Messages
- 27,920
- Reaction score
- 13,709
- Location
- CT
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Is the reality different from the official reson given?
Assuming they can find employment that exceeds 29 hours a week from an employer that treats them fairly. Otherwise, they won't be able to buy anything at all regardless of quality and motivation.
You'd think that somewhere in the 2500 pages of technobabble, somebody might have thought of this problem.
I'll tell you what I think. I think that the new bread of MBA toting corporate CEOs are carelessly and callously bleeding the institutions that are/were once the American symbols of economic ingenuity and success, in a concerted effort for ever higher profit margins, because greed is good. They don't give a damn about America, it's people, and certainly not the companies they so vaingloriously suck dry. Why should they? They typically only work their a couple years, and why should they care about the US? It's just one of many countries in which they live.
Others are right. Full time employment has been on the wane for years. Before Obama, before Bush. Really, since the mid 80s. The affordable Health Care Act is just a piss poor attemp to respond to that problem. It's an attempt to decrease the workweek, as our government once did in the past with the federal overtime act. More part time positions = higher number of people employed. Makes congress critters look good, you know?
Why do conservatives think everyone besides them are idiots?
I'll tell you what I think. I think that the new bread of MBA toting corporate CEOs are carelessly and callously bleeding the institutions that are/were once the American symbols of economic ingenuity and success, in a concerted effort for ever higher profit margins, because greed is good. They don't give a damn about America, it's people, and certainly not the companies they so vaingloriously suck dry. Why should they? They typically only work their a couple years, and why should they care about the US? It's just one of many countries in which they live.
Others are right. Full time employment has been on the wane for years. Before Obama, before Bush. Really, since the mid 80s. The affordable Health Care Act is just a piss poor attemp to respond to that problem. It's an attempt to decrease the workweek, as our government once did in the past with the federal overtime act. More part time positions = higher number of people employed. Makes congress critters look good, you know?
Oh they knew it would happen. It's redistribution of what's left of the available labor hours. Give people almost enough so you can subsidize them and you've got complete control.
Oh they knew it would happen. It's redistribution of what's left of the available labor hours. Give people almost enough so you can subsidize them and you've got complete control.
Making a push to get people to join "Obamacare" - CBS News
I'll consider it if Nancy Pelosi comes over to my house and explains all 2,409 pages (http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-111hr3590pp/pdf/BILLS-111hr3590pp.pdf) in detail.
Why do conservatives think everyone besides them are idiots?
After October 1st when your state has a healthcare exchange that you can shop, please come back in here and post about what you saw.
After October 1st when your state has a healthcare exchange that you can shop, please come back in here and post about what you saw.
Complete control of what? A failed and impoverished nation? I think you give them too much credit for being smart enough to control anything. I think they're actually dumb enough to have overlooked this little fly buzzing around in the ointment.
Look how inept they are. That's why you have these endless scandals. This is incompetence, not some insidious plot. Sure, there are wheels within the wheels but I doubt a 29 hour workweek was in the master plan.
I can not accept the premise that with as many people as we have in the House, Senate and the executive branch that they are collectively that stupid. When you ask people in the real world what the results of these policies will be they tend to be similar within a narrow range. The scandals suggest arrogance, not stupidity. They are doing what they are doing because they expect they can get away with it.
Arrogance = Stupidity.
Get away with what exactly? Creating chaos? How is that a "good thing" for them?
Congratulations on putting your bottom line first, I guess? Me, I take care of my employees.
"Never let a crisis go to waste". Creating an atmosphere where labor hours are reduced to the point where more people "need" government assistance is in the government's interests as it applies to the slave/ owner relationship. The term "wage slave" comes immediately to mind.
"Never let a crisis go to waste". Creating an atmosphere where labor hours are reduced to the point where more people "need" government assistance is in the government's interests as it applies to the slave/ owner relationship. The term "wage slave" comes immediately to mind.
After October 1st when your state has a healthcare exchange that you can shop, please come back in here and post about what you saw.
No different than the below being levied on the entirety of modern business leaders:Why do conservatives think everyone besides them are idiots?
Kevin said:I think that the new bread of MBA toting corporate CEOs are carelessly and callously bleeding the institutions that are/were once the American symbols of economic ingenuity and success, in a concerted effort for ever higher profit margins, because greed is good. They don't give a damn about America
So, you are saying that "the government" is trying to bring back slavery? Why? Who benefits? Usually there is a money trail....who is getting paid for this and why?
Government "slave owners". Who gets paid and who benefits is who they choose. Plenty of evidence in that in the so called stimulus, Obamacare, government employee scandals, and so on. The why is the easiest of all, power. Corrupt at that.
Congratulations on putting your bottom line first, I guess? Me, I take care of my employees.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?