Yes, we already know you don't like this solution. So what's your solution?
What are the percentages of equal opportunity?What is your solution for discrimination aginst Asians and Caucasions?
What are the percentages required under equal opportunity?
What are the percentages of equal opportunity?
The equal opportunity laws make no reference to percentages. Doing so would likely violate the same laws.
So now what is your solution for discrimination aginst Asians and Caucasians?
R's want equal treatment after centuries of reaping the benefits of others labors.Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College
Oral argument scheduled: October 11, 2022
Issue at hand: Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should overrule Grutter v. Bollinger and hold that institutions of higher education cannot use race as a factor in admissions
This is due to a clear bias against Asian and White Americans who are often denied admissions to make room for less academically deserving Black and Latino students. Harvard is clearly violating the Title VI of the Civil Rights Act by penalizing Asian American applicants by "engaging in racial balancing, overemphasizing race and rejecting workable race-neutral alternatives."
Looking Ahead: Upcoming U.S. Supreme Court Cases Employers Need to Know - Jackson Lewis
The U.S. Supreme Court decisions that were issued in June 2022 had a significant impact on employers, and employers are now looking at implementing policies and practices in response to the decisions. The Court’s decisions in Dobbs v.www.jacksonlewis.com
Leftists don't want people to be judged on their character, knowledge, or skills.
They want people to be judged by their race/gender/sexual orientation.
If we truly let the chips fall where they may, most Ivy League schools would be 99% Asian American and White.
The equal opportunity laws make no reference to percentages. Doing so would likely violate the same laws.
So now what is your solution for discrimination aginst Asians and Caucasians?
And how do you prove that? In case you didn't know, racists are only rarely wearing KKK hats now, and usually don't announce racism as a motive for discriminating against minorities.
Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College
Oral argument scheduled: October 11, 2022
Issue at hand: Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should overrule Grutter v. Bollinger and hold that institutions of higher education cannot use race as a factor in admissions
This is due to a clear bias against Asian and White Americans who are often denied admissions to make room for less academically deserving Black and Latino students. Harvard is clearly violating the Title VI of the Civil Rights Act by penalizing Asian American applicants by "engaging in racial balancing, overemphasizing race and rejecting workable race-neutral alternatives."
Looking Ahead: Upcoming U.S. Supreme Court Cases Employers Need to Know - Jackson Lewis
The U.S. Supreme Court decisions that were issued in June 2022 had a significant impact on employers, and employers are now looking at implementing policies and practices in response to the decisions. The Court’s decisions in Dobbs v.www.jacksonlewis.com
Leftists don't want people to be judged on their character, knowledge, or skills.
They want people to be judged by their race/gender/sexual orientation.
If we truly let the chips fall where they may, most Ivy League schools would be 99% Asian American and White.
Okay, so the person discriminating against the black person doesn't wear a KKK hat and doesn't cite "I don't like black people" as a reason. What then?The same way you prove any specific allegation.
Okay, so the person discriminating against the black person doesn't wear a KKK hat and doesn't cite "I don't like black people" as a reason. What then?
Prove that such discrimination exists.
Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College
Oral argument scheduled: October 11, 2022
Issue at hand: Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should overrule Grutter v. Bollinger and hold that institutions of higher education cannot use race as a factor in admissions
This is due to a clear bias against Asian and White Americans who are often denied admissions to make room for less academically deserving Black and Latino students. Harvard is clearly violating the Title VI of the Civil Rights Act by penalizing Asian American applicants by "engaging in racial balancing, overemphasizing race and rejecting workable race-neutral alternatives."
Looking Ahead: Upcoming U.S. Supreme Court Cases Employers Need to Know - Jackson Lewis
The U.S. Supreme Court decisions that were issued in June 2022 had a significant impact on employers, and employers are now looking at implementing policies and practices in response to the decisions. The Court’s decisions in Dobbs v.www.jacksonlewis.com
Leftists don't want people to be judged on their character, knowledge, or skills.
They want people to be judged by their race/gender/sexual orientation.
If we truly let the chips fall where they may, most Ivy League schools would be 99% Asian American and White.
What if they're equal?Prove that a less qualified non-black person was selected based on their race.
Prove that such discrimination exists.
Prove that such discrimination exists.
1. After the Roe decision, the Court may be afraid to "let the chips fall where they may."If we truly let the chips fall where they may, most Ivy League schools would be 99% Asian American and White.
Affirmative Action policy proves this already. Caucasians and particularly minority Asians are penalized in many college applications.
What if they're equal?
You tell me.
If there are two ‘equally qualified’ applicants then it was 50/50 that either would be selected.
If there were 10 ‘equally qualified’ applicants (and only one was black) then it was 10/90 that the black applicant would be selected.
That's a claim, not a proof. Prove your original claim or retract it.
Affirmative Action policy is 100% proof. As noted by another poster, AA is race based, which is discrimination.
So what has that resulted in, numbers wise?Affirmative Action policy is 100% proof. As noted by another poster, AA is race based, which is discrimination.