I fully appreciate how dear Americans view free speech. It is something that has been made crystal clear to me on this board. That said, I'm more for the 'greater good'. No different to my total opposition to the fanatics that (although an extreme minority) attempted to protest Military home coming parades, in the UK. I fully agree it serves no one, and is simply promulgating hatred and is not conducive with the principles of a Western society. I have NO issue with banning such virile hate messages.
Paul
Once again...it has nothing to do with "valid" or "excuse." This is life. Provoking a snake will get you bit. Worse, get somebody else bit while you taunt from behind cover. If you are going to exercise your right to incite and feed fire, then hang out with the fire and except the responsibility of your actions.
Don't hurt yourself claiming that others have "reading comprehension problems". Fact is, I'm FAR more educated than you and your comment was stupid.
Who is Sam Bacile?
Mystery over identity of man behind film which accuses Mohammed of being 'a fraud, a pedophile and a womanizer' after no record of him is found
A search is on for the man behind the 'blasphemous' film that branded Mohammed a fraud, pedophile and a womaniser and sparked deadly protests after records apparently reveal he does not exist.
The producer, whose movie led to demonstrations that left the U.S. ambassador to Libya and three other American officials dead on Tuesday, claimed he was an Israeli Jew named Sam Bacile and living in California.
But his identity began to crumble as it emerged Israeli authorities had no records of him being a citizen, and there were no property, phone, license or court records of Bacile in California.
Despite claiming he had spent $5 million on the film, he also has virtually no footprint in the Hollywood community, has no agent listed on IMDBPro and no credits on any film or TV production.
Steve Klein, a consultant for the film, told the Nationalthat Bacile is not Israeli or Jewish and is in fact working under a pseudonym - but he does not know the man's real name.
Read more: Who is Sam Bacile? Identity of man behind anti-Mohammed film crumbles as no records found | Mail Online
Pretentious, much.
Talk about bad analogies.There are a few points to make about each of these examples. I'll try to be brief.
Firstly, incitement to discrimination and/or violence based racial, sexual or religious hatred, is not free speech. I know US posters are familiar with the concept of shouting 'Fire!' in a crowded theatre. Most modern western nations are theatres crowded with all stripes of humanity, some more flammable than others.
...
How so? What are some examples of artistic representations of sexuality banned in the US but not in many European countries? Child pornography?In some senses many European nations have more liberal approaches to free speech than the US. The US is far, far more censorious of artistic representations of sexuality and the human body, for example.
"the greater good" has been marched out as the #1 excuse of every tyranny in history.
If a gay guy dresses in pink and wings, and wears a cross, should he be prosecuted if a gang of phobe-thugs attack him? After all, he WAS provocative of those mindless scumbags. So we should probably charge him with some kind of a crime, right?
I think that's correct. Political activism often involves tangling with the law directly and indirectly, if that occured here I'm not sure why we should be surprised if someone tried to build a case against him based on his actions. But if he didn't break a law, I don't think that responsibility will (or should) move into legal territory, do you?andalublue said:The film-maker is not responsible for the actions of others. He is responsible for his own provocative and prejudiced actions however.
My saying I have served here, there and everywhere adds what to this discussion? Remind yourself, Grant said "be careful not to put yourself in harms way" I merely highlighted the fact that, like many on this board, I have been in "harms way".
Paul
Me pretentious? Never!
Only most of the time
Look, gunner, the guy claimed that being raped was like driving drunk and crashing.
When he claimed that I have a "reading comprehension problem" I felt justified in blowing his education out of the water. I think it was fair, and I was only defending myself. I didn't initiate the "who's a better reader" argument, he did.
Fair enough.
Paul
Me pretentious? Never!
Look, gunner, the guy claimed that being raped was like driving drunk and crashing.
.
I never said they were the same thing, and thats is why I said your reading comprehension was in question
you can try to spin it all you want but anyone can go back and see what I said and see I said that I do NOT compare rape and drunk driving
tell that to the judge that recently told a woman she was partially to blame for being out at that place at such a late hour.
I mean if a woman dresses like a whore and is walking the streets doesn't mean she isn't responsible for bringing such actions ? please it's called being responsible and having situational awareness
now I am not saying she deserves it or its acceptable but at the same time I don't feel sorry for her. I mean do you feel sorry for a drunk driver who brings on his own actions by drinking and then driving?
We need to take these attacks seriously, an attack on a nations consulate/embassy is a very serious act of aggression. I think that killing one of our diplomats in our consulate/embassy is an act of war and should be treated as such (I'm not advocating going to war, but I am advocating treating this more than just an international killing of a US citizen and treating it like it is).
I never said they were the same thing, and thats is why I said your reading comprehension was in question
you can try to spin it all you want but anyone can go back and see what I said and see I said that I do NOT compare rape and drunk driving
what I was comparing were the PEOPLE who made bad decisions to engage in dangerous activities or behaviors which is not the same as comparing actual drunk driving to rape
I disagreed with most policies under the Bush regime does that mean I hate Americans ?
YOU know full well I'm not justifying the murder of one of the most integrated Ambassadors in the ME. Fluent in Arabic, and the customs Libya. So, quit with the 'cheap shots'.
Paul
So what we learned here was that we shouldn't say or do anything which might possibly be offensive or provocative to Muslims because they'll respond like murderous thugs and we'll have only ourselves to blame.
Is that today's lesson?
Mitt Romney capitalised on the incident to score political points but it's a backlash.
Romney Shredded For Embassy Attack Response - Business Insider
There is that. I was leaning more towards John Stuart Mill,
"Mill's On Liberty addresses the nature and limits of the power that can be legitimately exercised by society over the individual. One argument that Mill develops further than any previous philosopher is the harm principle. The harm principle holds that each individual has the right to act as he wants, so long as these actions do not harm others"
John Stuart Mill - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Paul
I think that's clear enough. "Sluts" who get raped are the same as drunk drivers, and they are responsible for crashing their own car.
we have been manipulated just as the Libyans and Egyptians have been manipulated.
So what we learned here was that we shouldn't say or do anything which might possibly be offensive or provocative to Muslims because they'll respond like murderous thugs and we'll have only ourselves to blame.
Is that today's lesson?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?